Transonic Aerodynamic Loading Characteristics of a Wing-body-tail Combination Having 52.5° Sweptback Wing of Aspect Ratio 3 with Conical Wing Camber and Body Indentation for a Design Mach Number [square Root Of] 2 PDF Download

Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Transonic Aerodynamic Loading Characteristics of a Wing-body-tail Combination Having 52.5° Sweptback Wing of Aspect Ratio 3 with Conical Wing Camber and Body Indentation for a Design Mach Number [square Root Of] 2 PDF full book. Access full book title Transonic Aerodynamic Loading Characteristics of a Wing-body-tail Combination Having 52.5° Sweptback Wing of Aspect Ratio 3 with Conical Wing Camber and Body Indentation for a Design Mach Number [square Root Of] 2 by Marlowe D. Cassetti. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.

Transonic Aerodynamic Loading Characteristics of a Wing-body-tail Combination Having 52.5° Sweptback Wing of Aspect Ratio 3 with Conical Wing Camber and Body Indentation for a Design Mach Number [square Root Of] 2

Transonic Aerodynamic Loading Characteristics of a Wing-body-tail Combination Having 52.5° Sweptback Wing of Aspect Ratio 3 with Conical Wing Camber and Body Indentation for a Design Mach Number [square Root Of] 2 PDF Author: Marlowe D. Cassetti
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Transonic wind tunnels
Languages : en
Pages : 104

Book Description
An investigation has been made of the effects of conical wing camber and body indentation according to the supersonic area rule on the aerodynamic wing loading characteristics of a wing-body-tail configuration at transonic speeds. The wing aspect ratio was 3, taper ratio was 0.1, and quarter-chord-line sweepback was 52.5° with 3-percent-thick airfoil sections. The tests were conducted in the Langley 16-foot transonic tunnel at Mach numbers from 0.80 to 1.05 and at angles of attack from 0° to 14°, with Reynolds numbers based on mean aerodynamic chord varying from 7 x 106 to 8 x 106. Conical camber delayed wing-tip stall and reduced the severity of the accompanying longitudinal instability but did not appreciably affect the spanwise load distribution at angles of attack below tip stall. Body indentation reduced to transonic chordwise center-of-pressure travel from about 8 percent to 5 percent of the mean aerodynamic chord.