Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download The Limits of Judicialization PDF full book. Access full book title The Limits of Judicialization by Sandra Botero. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Sandra Botero Publisher: Cambridge University Press ISBN: 1009098349 Category : Political Science Languages : en Pages : 363
Book Description
Utilizing case studies of seven Latin American countries, this book reassesses the role of legal institutions in the politics of the region.
Author: Sandra Botero Publisher: Cambridge University Press ISBN: 1009098349 Category : Political Science Languages : en Pages : 363
Book Description
Utilizing case studies of seven Latin American countries, this book reassesses the role of legal institutions in the politics of the region.
Author: Sandra Botero Publisher: Cambridge University Press ISBN: 1009103415 Category : Political Science Languages : en Pages : 363
Book Description
Latin America was one of the earliest and most enthusiastic adopters of what has come to be known as the judicialization of politics - the use of law and legal institutions as tools of social contestation to curb the abuse of power in government, resolve policy disputes, and enforce and expand civil, political, and socio-economic rights. Almost forty years into this experiment, The Limits of Judicialization brings together a cross-disciplinary group of scholars to assess the role that law and courts play in Latin American politics. Featuring studies of hot-button topics including abortion, state violence, judicial corruption, and corruption prosecutions, this volume argues that the institutional and cultural changes that empowered courts, what the editors call the 'judicialization superstructure,' often fall short of the promise of greater accountability and rights protection. Illustrative and expansive, this volume offers a truly interdisciplinary analysis of the limits of judicialized politics.
Author: Rachel Sieder Publisher: Springer ISBN: 1137108878 Category : Social Science Languages : en Pages : 314
Book Description
During the last two decades the judiciary has come to play an increasingly important political role in Latin America. Constitutional courts and supreme courts are more active in counterbalancing executive and legislative power than ever before. At the same time, the lack of effective citizenship rights has prompted ordinary people to press their claims and secure their rights through the courts. This collection of essays analyzes the diverse manifestations of the judicialization of politics in contemporary Latin America, assessing their positive and negative consequences for state-society relations, the rule of law, and democratic governance in the region. With individual chapters exploring Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Mexico, Peru and Venezuela, it advances a comparative framework for thinking about the nature of the judicialization of politics within contemporary Latin American democracies.
Author: Pedro C. Magalhâes Publisher: ISBN: Category : Judicial review Languages : en Pages : 394
Book Description
Abstract: A growing body of literature has suggested that courts are becoming increasingly powerful political actors in many contemporary democracies. This trend is supposed to be stronger where constitutional courts perform a so-called "abstract review" of legislation. Such courts are the potentialrecipients of litigation by opposition parties against legislation passed by parliamentary majorities, and enjoy the power to veto it if they find unconstitutional provisions. Since oppositions have unrestrained incentives to contribute to the expansion of these courts's jurisdiction and the latter are unconstrained by majority will, the inevitable result should be an important and systematic reduction of the discretion enjoyed by legislative majorities. Focusing on the cases of Spain and Portugal, where constitutional courts have been in place for about two decades, this study challenges such understanding of the consequences of abstract review of legislation. Its first part deals with the institutional design of constitutional courts in both countries, including the rules of appointment and retention of judges frequently neglected by the extant literature. It shows that, unless conditions are such that presently dominant political actors can shape judicial institutions as insurance mechanisms against their future displacement from power, the resulting rules are likely to prevent the conversion of courts into full-fledged countermajoritarian actors, and may even allow for their congruence with and responsiveness to the preferences of both present and future majorities. The second part of this study discusses how, in the last two decades, those institutional rules have actually shaped the incentives and constraints faced by majorities, oppositions, and judges. On the one hand, the possibility that strategic oppositions experience policy and electoral costs from litigation has contributed, most of the time, to keep the jurisdiction of constitutional courts over legislative processes under relatively strict boundaries. On the other hand, strategic judges have reacted to institutional constraints, remaining responsive to the parties that appointed them and displaying deference towards contemporary majorities. Thus, the pressures towards the judicialization of politics resulting from the creation of abstract review institutions in Spain and Portugal have been effectively contained, preventing an inexorable trend towards a government of judges.
Author: Ran Hirschl Publisher: Harvard University Press ISBN: 9780674038677 Category : Law Languages : en Pages : 306
Book Description
In countries and supranational entities around the globe, constitutional reform has transferred an unprecedented amount of power from representative institutions to judiciaries. The constitutionalization of rights and the establishment of judicial review are widely believed to have benevolent and progressive origins, and significant redistributive, power-diffusing consequences. Ran Hirschl challenges this conventional wisdom. Drawing upon a comprehensive comparative inquiry into the political origins and legal consequences of the recent constitutional revolutions in Canada, Israel, New Zealand, and South Africa, Hirschl shows that the trend toward constitutionalization is hardly driven by politicians' genuine commitment to democracy, social justice, or universal rights. Rather, it is best understood as the product of a strategic interplay among hegemonic yet threatened political elites, influential economic stakeholders, and judicial leaders. This self-interested coalition of legal innovators determines the timing, extent, and nature of constitutional reforms. Hirschl demonstrates that whereas judicial empowerment through constitutionalization has a limited impact on advancing progressive notions of distributive justice, it has a transformative effect on political discourse. The global trend toward juristocracy, Hirschl argues, is part of a broader process whereby political and economic elites, while they profess support for democracy and sustained development, attempt to insulate policymaking from the vicissitudes of democratic politics.
Author: Sandra Botero
Author: Sandra Botero
Author: Sandra Botero
Author: Rachel Sieder
Author: Pedro C. Magalhães
Author: Gary L. McDowell
Author: Pedro C. Magalhâes
Author: Charles Edward Clark
Author: Pedro Coutinho Magalhães
Author: Ran Hirschl
Author: Mark S. Harding