The Impeachment Trial of the New Hampshire Supreme Court Chief Justice

The Impeachment Trial of the New Hampshire Supreme Court Chief Justice PDF Author: Mary E. Brown
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780970717214
Category : Judges
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Book Description
The author was one of 22 New Hampshire State Senators who served as judges and jurors in the impeachment trial of New Hampshire Supreme Court Justice David Brock, in the year 2000. She has written this account to put the impeachment proceedings in a historical perspective, to seek out the truth and discover possible ways to avoid similar events in the future, and to express her own impressions of the event as well as the views of a wide variety of other participants. c. Book News Inc.

Impeachment of David A. Brock, Chief Justice of the New Hampshire Supreme Court

Impeachment of David A. Brock, Chief Justice of the New Hampshire Supreme Court PDF Author: New Hampshire. General Court. Senate
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judicial ethics
Languages : en
Pages :

Book Description
Compilation of documents pertaining to the impeachment trial of Chief Justice David A. Brock, New Hampshire Supreme Court.

The Impeachment of Chief Justice David Brock

The Impeachment of Chief Justice David Brock PDF Author: John Cerullo
Publisher: Lexington Books
ISBN: 1498565905
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 325

Book Description
At this juncture in American history, some of our most hard-fought state-level political struggles involve control of state supreme courts. New Hampshire witnessed one of the most dramatic of these, culminating in the impeachment of Chief Justice David Brock in 2000, but the issues raised by the case are hardly confined to New Hampshire. They involved the proper nature and operation of judicial independence within a “populist” civic culture that had long assumed the primacy of the legislative branch, extolled its “citizen legislators” over insulated and professionalized elites, and entrusted those legislators to properly supervise the judiciary. In the last few decades of the 20th Century, New Hampshire’s judiciary had been substantially reconfigured: constitutional amendments and other measures endorsed by the national judicial-modernization movement had secured for it a much higher level of independence and internal unification than it had historically enjoyed. However, a bipartisan body of legislators remained committed to the principle of legislative supremacy inscribed in the state constitution of 1784. The 1980s and 1990s witnessed a series of clashes over court administration, allegations of judicial corruption, and finally a bitter and protracted battle over Court decisions on educational funding. Chief Justice Brock publicly embodied the judicial branch's new status and assertiveness. When information came to light regarding some of his administrative actions on the high court, deepening antipathy toward him exploded into an impeachment crisis. The struggle over Brock’s conduct raised significant questionsabout the meaning and proper practice of impeachment itself as a feature of democratic governance. When articles of impeachment were voted by the House of Representatives, the state Senate faced the difficult task of establishing trial protocols that would balance thepolitical and juridical responsibilities devolved on them, simultaneously, by the state constitution.Having struck that balance, the trial they conducted would finally acquit Brock of all charges. Nevertheless, David Brock’s impeachment was a highly consequential ordeal that provided a needed catalyst for reforms intended to produce a productive recalibration of legislative-judicial relations.

Judicial Impeachment

Judicial Impeachment PDF Author: Mary L. Volcansek
Publisher: University of Illinois Press
ISBN: 9780252019616
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 214

Book Description
Impeachment by the House and conviction by the Senate are the sole means of removing presidents and other federal officials from office. The congressional power to do so had been used sparingly until the early 1980s, when three federal judges were removed by the Senate in almost as many years. Through extensive use of original transcripts, Mary Volcansek analyzes the criminal and congressional proceedings that led to the Senate's conviction and removal of U.S. Judges Harry Claiborne (Nevada), Walter Nixon (Mississippi), and Alcee Hastings (Florida). Claiborne and Nixon both had already been convicted of felonies, yet they demanded impeachment and trial rather than resign their judicial appointments. They and Hastings portrayed themselves as victims of vendettas, claims that altered little when the Senate considered their cases. Volcansek explores various political and legal explanations for the rise in impeachments, among them the Judicial Conduct Act of 1980; the Public Integrity Office of the U.S. Department of Justice; partisanship and ideology; and judicial corruption. She also shows how the cases of Claiborne, Hastings, and Nixon are more than studies in judicial misconduct: the events leading to their Senate convictions, she is convinced, allow evaluation of how law enforcement, the Judicial Conduct Act, impeachment, and politics fit together. Finally, she considers the impeachments in the context of the competing ideals of judicial accountability and independence, suggesting that a type of special counsel be used to investigate alleged judicial misbehavior as a means of stemming misconduct while insulating the judiciary from executive or partisan interference.

Proceedings in the Court of Impeachment in the Matter of the Impeachment of George G. Barnard, a Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Proceedings in the Court of Impeachment in the Matter of the Impeachment of George G. Barnard, a Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Impeachments
Languages : en
Pages : 826

Book Description


The Great Impeachment and Trial of Andrew Johnson, President of the United States

The Great Impeachment and Trial of Andrew Johnson, President of the United States PDF Author: Andrew Johnson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Impeachments
Languages : en
Pages : 322

Book Description


Grand Inquests

Grand Inquests PDF Author: William H. Rehnquist
Publisher: William Morrow
ISBN:
Category : Biography & Autobiography
Languages : en
Pages : 356

Book Description
The two acquittals by the Senate were important because they forestalled the use of impeachment solely for political purposes in this country. Chief Justice Rehnquist tells the stories. Annotation copyright by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR

Trial of David M. Furches, Now Chief Justice, and Formerly Associate Justice

Trial of David M. Furches, Now Chief Justice, and Formerly Associate Justice PDF Author:
Publisher: Forgotten Books
ISBN: 9780266353805
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 982

Book Description
Excerpt from Trial of David M. Furches, Now Chief Justice, and Formerly Associate Justice: And Robert M. Douglas, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, on Impeachment by the House of Representatives for High Crimes and Misdemeanors Twenty-ninth District - J. O. Mcintosh, Triangle, N. C., T. J. Dula, Wilkesboro, N. C. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

The Great Chief Justice

The Great Chief Justice PDF Author: Charles F. Hobson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Biography & Autobiography
Languages : en
Pages : 278

Book Description
"John Marshall remains one of the towering figures in the landscape of American law. From the Revolution to the age of Jackson, he played a critical role in defining the "province of the judiciary" and the constitutional limits of legislative action. In this masterly study, Charles Hobson clarifies the coherence and thrust of Marshall's jurisprudence while keeping in sight the man as well as the jurist." "Hobson argues that contrary to his critics, Marshall was no ideologue intent upon appropriating the lawmaking powers of Congress. Rather, he was deeply committed to a principled jurisprudence that was based on a steadfast devotion to a "science of law" richly steeped in the common law tradition. As Hobson shows, such jurisprudence governed every aspect of Marshall's legal philosophy and court opinions, including his understanding of judicial review." "The chief justice, Hobson contends, did not invent judicial review (as many have claimed) but consolidated its practice by adapting common law methods to the needs of a new nation. In practice, his use of judicial review was restrained, employed almost exclusively against acts of the state legislatures. Ultimately, he wielded judicial review to prevent the states from undermining the power of a national government still struggling to establish sovereignty at home and respect abroad."--BOOK JACKET.Title Summary field provided by Blackwell North America, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Proceedings

Proceedings PDF Author: Bar Association of the State of New Hampshire
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 406

Book Description