The Effects of Adjuvants, Application Timing, Droplet Sizes, and Spray Volumes on Acifluorfen and Imazethapyr Efficacy PDF Download

Author: Eric H. Schimek
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 124

View

Book Description

Author: Kelli L. Nelms
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Adjuvant
Languages : en
Pages : 11

View

Book Description
Many factors, including adjuvants, pesticide formulations, and nozzle tips, affect spray droplet size. It is important to understand these factors as spray droplet size affects both drift and efficacy of pesticides, which is a main concern with pesticide application. A laser particle analyzer was used to determine the spray droplet size and distributions of a range of formulations sprayed through several types of nozzle tips. Nozzles included were extended range flat fan sizes 11003 and 11005 (Spraying Systems XR), air induction flat fan sizes 11005 and 11004 (AI), air induction extended range flat fan size 11005 (AIXR), preorifice flat fan size 11005 (TT), and a second preorifice flat fan size 2.5 (TF). Several deposition/retention adjuvants were studied, including Array, Interlock, In-Place, and Thrust. Another study looked at diflufenzopyr + dicamba (Status, BASF) in combination with several adjuvants. Also, three fungicides were evaluated at differing spray volumes. Results indicated that the droplet size of some nozzle tips is more affected than others by changes in the contents of the spray solution.

Author: North Central Weed Science Society (U.S.)
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Weeds
Languages : en
Pages : 334

View

Book Description

Author: Peter Baur
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Adjuvants
Languages : en
Pages : 9

View

Book Description
The effects of adjuvants on spreading of small droplets after spray application and of larger drops with volumes in the microliter range was studied. The characterization of spreading as affected by adjuvants is done often with lab tests on artificial surfaces. In these tests much larger drops in the microliter range are used and plant factors such as the presence of hairs or crystalline waxes and spray related factors such as rapid evaporation, a different drop size magnitude, a drop size distribution in reality, and effects of adjuvants on drop size are not considered. For a set of test compounds from different chemical classes we evaluated stepwise the approximation to real systems with plant surfaces representing the major surface features. With larger drops of 10 and 20 μl we obtained a surprisingly good correlation of spreading on Parafilm® M and the mature leaves of Chlorophytum, tomato, rape, and corn. With good wetters better spreading was observed on leaves than on Parafilm M. The correlation of spread diameters with real spray (flat fan nozzle, 300 l/ha) on an easily wettable plant and drops on Parafilm M was very good as well though with the best spreaders the gravimetric momentum on spreading and longer times for evaporation overestimated spreading of the larger droplets on Parafilm M. If the mean spread diameters of real spray was plotted vs. the logtransformed spread diameter on Parafilm M a linear correlation was obtained (r2=0.92).

Author: Weed Science Society of America. Meeting
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Weeds
Languages : en
Pages : 116

View

Book Description

Author: Jake McNeal
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 106

View

Book Description
The application of pesticides in agriculture production systems is a complex process and involves a series of factors that dynamically interact to impact overall pesticide application efficacy. Spray droplet formation, target impaction and deposition, plant uptake, and subsequent biological response are all functions of pesticide active ingredient, nozzle selection, application pressure, and carrier volume. Smaller spray droplets with a lower kinetic energy result in greater spray droplet retention on the leaf surface relative to larger droplets. Consequently, larger spray droplets with higher kinetic energy are poorly retained on the leaf surface and yield minimal coverage of leaf surface tissue. While smaller droplets maximize target coverage and spray droplet retention, larger spray droplets minimize off-target movement and agrichemical transport. Consequently, application factors that maximize pesticide efficacy and minimize off-target movement are often incongruous elements. Therefore, the objective of this research was to evaluate the impact of carrier volume and spray droplet size on the efficacy of various pesticide applications in Mississippi. These data indicate that 1) for thrips and tarnished plant bug control, acephate and sulfoxaflor are superior dicamba application partners relative to dimethoate and thiamethoxam, respectively, insecticide efficacy did not vary due to spray droplet size when applied without dicamba, and maximum efficacy was achieved with a carrier volume of 187 L ha-1; 2) dicamba + acephate and dicamba + thiamethoxam or sulfoxaflor are efficacious options to control Palmer amaranth relative to dicamba applied alone, and maximum Palmer amaranth control was achieved with a carrier volume of 187 L ha-1; 3) cotton defoliation efficacy is positively and negatively correlated with carrier volume and spray droplet size, respectively, and maximum efficacy was achieved with cotton defoliation programs consisting of two-applications, each with a carrier volume of 187 L ha-1 and 200 μm droplets; 4) soybean harvest aid efficacy is primarily a function of the harvest aid applied and that the impact of carrier volume and spray droplet size varies across harvest aids. However, when paraquat is applied, a carrier volume between 47 and 187 L ha-1 should be utilized with droplets of 200-500 μm to maximize harvest aid efficacy.

Author: Chenghai Yang
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Droplet size
Languages : en
Pages : 9

View

Book Description
Rotary atomizers are used in a number of aerial applications, such as forest pest spraying and mosquito control sprays. These types of atomizers have a rotating cage at speeds of 2,000 to 10,000 revolutions per minute (rpm) through which a spray is emitted and atomized. Many applicators routinely add spray adjuvants to change the droplet size, reduce drift potential, or to reduce evaporative effects of a particular spray solution; therefore, six commonly used classes of spray adjuvants were evaluated to determine their effects on droplet size. If an applicator's only concern was minimizing spray drift, the applicator could choose a polymer or high surfactant oil concentrate for helicopter speeds and a polymer for fixed-wing applications. For applicators working under hot, dry conditions where evaporation is a concern, choosing an oil-based adjuvant to help get better coverage by creating smaller droplets that do not evaporate would be recommended. Understanding the role the different adjuvant types play in the final droplet size of the spray is key to successfully setting up and making applications with rotary atomizers.

Author: Kevin Penfield
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Adjuvant
Languages : en
Pages : 12

View

Book Description
Drifting of fine droplets during the application of pesticides is an issue of increasing commercial and regulatory importance. Spray drift damages susceptible crops, wastes resources, and results in inconsistent weed control. Several strategies are currently used to mitigate this problem. These include enhanced nozzle technology, improved application techniques, and inclusion of drift control additives in the final tank mix. Elimination of small diameter droplets ("driftable fines") is a key goal. Measurements were made of droplet size distributions of sprayed pesticide formulations containing commercial products representative of the leading drift control technologies, including guar, polyacrylamides, lecithin, and oil/surfactant mixtures. Effects of spray nozzle and pressure were also evaluated. Nozzle technology plays a large role in determining the spray droplet size spectrum. However, there is a strong interplay between nozzle design and formulation variables. We found that drift control agents have greater impact on spray from flat fan nozzles. Also, the ranking of adjuvants depends on the nozzle technology in use: for glyphosate/ammonium sulfate solutions, polymers were more effective in reducing fines from a flat fan nozzle, while surfactant-based products were marginally superior when an air induction nozzle was used. The regulatory community is currently focused on mitigating the generation of small droplets. However, the generation of oversized droplets also effects spray efficacy. The impact of drift control agents on the breadth of the droplet size spectrum is an aspect of drift control which is often overlooked. We found that emulsion-based products tighten the droplet size distribution, while the polymer-based products shift the mean droplet diameter up, broadening the distribution in the process: while the latter effect may earn better ratings from regulatory agencies concerned exclusively with spray drift mitigation, it may be less helpful in enhancing application efficacy.

Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Agriculture
Languages : en
Pages : 1688

View

Book Description

Author: Emily Cabrera
Publisher: University of Georgia Press
ISBN: 0820361577
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 264

View

Book Description
The Georgia Pest Management Handbook provides current information on selection, application, and safe use of pest control chemicals. This handbook has recommendations for pest control around homes and on pets; for pests of home garden vegetables, fruits, and ornamentals; and for pests of public health interest associated with our homes. Cultural, biological, physical, and other types of control are recommended where appropriate. Pesticide recommendations are based on information on the manufacturer labels and on performance data from research and extension trials at the University of Georgia and its sister institutions. Because environmental conditions, the severity of pest pressure, and methods of application vary widely, recommendations do not imply that performance of pesticides will always be acceptable. This publication is intended to be used only as a guide. Trade and brand names are used only for information. The University of Georgia does not guarantee nor warrant published standards on any product mentioned; nor does the use of a trade or brand name imply approval of any product to the exclusion of others that may also be suitable. Always follow the use instructions and precautions on the pesticide label. For questions, concerns, or improvement suggestions regarding the Georgia Pest Management Handbook, please contact your county agent.