Reexamining the Scientific Basis for the Linear No-threshold Model of Low-dose Radiation PDF Download

Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Reexamining the Scientific Basis for the Linear No-threshold Model of Low-dose Radiation PDF full book. Access full book title Reexamining the Scientific Basis for the Linear No-threshold Model of Low-dose Radiation by United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science. Subcommittee on Energy and Environment. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.

Reexamining the Scientific Basis for the Linear No-threshold Model of Low-dose Radiation

Reexamining the Scientific Basis for the Linear No-threshold Model of Low-dose Radiation PDF Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science. Subcommittee on Energy and Environment
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 1468

Book Description


Reexamining the Scientific Basis for the Linear No-threshold Model of Low-dose Radiation

Reexamining the Scientific Basis for the Linear No-threshold Model of Low-dose Radiation PDF Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science. Subcommittee on Energy and Environment
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 1468

Book Description


Reexamining the Scientific Basis for the Linear No-threshold Model of Low-dose Radiation

Reexamining the Scientific Basis for the Linear No-threshold Model of Low-dose Radiation PDF Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science. Subcommittee on Energy and Environment
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Radiation
Languages : en
Pages : 1417

Book Description


Reexamining the Scientific Basis for the Linear No-threshold Model of Low-dose Radiation

Reexamining the Scientific Basis for the Linear No-threshold Model of Low-dose Radiation PDF Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science. Subcommittee on Energy and Environment
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 1436

Book Description


The Linear No-threshold Model Does Not Hold for Low-dose Ionizing Radiation

The Linear No-threshold Model Does Not Hold for Low-dose Ionizing Radiation PDF Author: Antony Michael Hooker
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Ionizing radiation
Languages : en
Pages : 6

Book Description


Summary of Activities of the Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives for the ... Congress

Summary of Activities of the Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives for the ... Congress PDF Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Science and state
Languages : en
Pages : 364

Book Description


Congressional Record

Congressional Record PDF Author: United States. Congress
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 696

Book Description
The Congressional Record is the official record of the proceedings and debates of the United States Congress. It is published daily when Congress is in session. The Congressional Record began publication in 1873. Debates for sessions prior to 1873 are recorded in The Debates and Proceedings in the Congress of the United States (1789-1824), the Register of Debates in Congress (1824-1837), and the Congressional Globe (1833-1873)

American Book Publishing Record

American Book Publishing Record PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Books
Languages : en
Pages : 2068

Book Description


Assessment of the Scientific Information for the Radiation Exposure Screening and Education Program

Assessment of the Scientific Information for the Radiation Exposure Screening and Education Program PDF Author: National Research Council
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309096103
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 431

Book Description
The Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) was set up by Congress in 1990 to compensate people who have been diagnosed with specified cancers and chronic diseases that could have resulted from exposure to nuclear-weapons tests at various U.S. test sites. Eligible claimants include civilian onsite participants, downwinders who lived in areas currently designated by RECA, and uranium workers and ore transporters who meet specified residence or exposure criteria. The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), which oversees the screening, education, and referral services program for RECA populations, asked the National Academies to review its program and assess whether new scientific information could be used to improve its program and determine if additional populations or geographic areas should be covered under RECA. The report recommends Congress should establish a new science-based process using a method called "probability of causation/assigned share" (PC/AS) to determine eligibility for compensation. Because fallout may have been higher for people outside RECA-designated areas, the new PC/AS process should apply to all residents of the continental US, Alaska, Hawaii, and overseas US territories who have been diagnosed with specific RECA-compensable diseases and who may have been exposed, even in utero, to radiation from U.S. nuclear-weapons testing fallout. However, because the risks of radiation-induced disease are generally low at the exposure levels of concern in RECA populations, in most cases it is unlikely that exposure to radioactive fallout was a substantial contributing cause of cancer.

Radiation and Reason

Radiation and Reason PDF Author: Wade Allison
Publisher: YPD-BOOKS
ISBN: 0956275613
Category : Nuclear energy
Languages : en
Pages : 222

Book Description
This is a positive and accessible account of the effect of radiation on life that brings good news for the future of mankind. For more than half a century the view that radiation represents an extreme hazard has been accepted. This book challenges that view by facing the question "How dangerous is ionising radiation?" Briefly the answer is that radiation is about a thousand times less hazardous than suggested by current safety standards. For many this will come as a surprise and then quickly raise a second question "Why are people so worried about radiation?" This is the out-of-date result of Cold War politics combined with a concern about radiation that was appropriate in an earlier age when the scientific understanding was limited. In the book these answers are explained in accessible language and related directly to modern scientific evidence and understanding, for instance the high levels of radiation used to the benefit of health in every major hospital. Four facts illustrate the need for a new understanding. 1. The radiation levels in the nuclear waste storage hall at Sellafield, UK are so low (1 micro-sievert per hour) that anyone would have to stay there for a million hours to receive the same dose that any patient on a course of radiotherapy treatment receives to their healthy tissue in a single day (1 sievert or gray). 2. The radiation dose experienced by the survivors of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs caused 0.6% to die of radiation-induced cancer between 1950 and 2000, that is about 1/20 of the chance of dying of cancer anyway and less than the chance of being killed on US highways in that period. 3. The wildlife at Chernobyl today is reported to be thriving, despite being radioactive. 4. The mortality of UK radiation workers before age 85 from all cancers is 15-20% lower than comparable groups. The case for a complete change in attitude towards radiation safety is unrelated to the effects of climate change. But the realisation that radiation and nuclear energy are much safer than is usually supposed is of extreme importance to the current discussion of alternatives to fossil fuels and their relative costs.

Radiation from Medical Procedures in the Pathogenesis of Cancer and Ischemic Heart Disease

Radiation from Medical Procedures in the Pathogenesis of Cancer and Ischemic Heart Disease PDF Author: John W. Gofman
Publisher: Committee for Nuclear Responsibility
ISBN:
Category : Medical
Languages : en
Pages : 720

Book Description
Medical X-rays, including fluoroscopy and CT scans, are a major cause of both cancer and coronary heart disease, according to this new study. This reader-friendly work uses no complex statistical operations. It shows each step between raw data and conclusions, and defines basic terms and concepts. Startling conclusions are supported by detailed reviews of medical studies from the 1940s through the 1990s. The author recommends X-ray procedures at much lower dosage levels. Includes a booklet summarizing conclusions of the study. The author is a professor of molecular and cell biology at the University of California-Berkeley, and has investigated the effects of medical X- rays since the 1960s. Paper edition (unseen), $27. Annotation copyrighted by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR