Range-wide Assessment of Land Use and Cover Change Near Indiana Bat Hibernacula PDF Download

Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Range-wide Assessment of Land Use and Cover Change Near Indiana Bat Hibernacula PDF full book. Access full book title Range-wide Assessment of Land Use and Cover Change Near Indiana Bat Hibernacula by Michael G. Just. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.

Range-wide Assessment of Land Use and Cover Change Near Indiana Bat Hibernacula

Range-wide Assessment of Land Use and Cover Change Near Indiana Bat Hibernacula PDF Author: Michael G. Just
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Book Description
It is estimated that 95% of all federally endangered Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis) hibernate in 71 hibernacula in the eastern US. Given the species0́9 high site fidelity, seasonally heightened population densities, and the limited availability of suitable overwintering sites, land use and cover change (LUCC) near hibernacula is expected to affect wintering populations. The landscapes surrounding hibernacula not only provide critical roosting and foraging habitat but also support the highly specific microclimates Indiana bats need for successful hibernation. To date, the assumption has been that the greater the amount of forest cover, the better the habitat for Indiana bats. The extent to which Indiana bat hibernacula may be threatened by LUCC has not been previously investigated. Land adjacent to most hibernacula does not have land use or conservation protections; consequently, it is important that LUCC near hibernacula is evaluated to assess and prevent harmful impacts to wintering Indiana bat populations. Landscape characterizations included measurements of land cover composition and spatial configurations, as well as climate and insolation variables. I modeled potential future LUCC through 2016 near 225 Indiana bat hibernacula using an empirically derived, stochastic projection model that combines Markov chain analysis, multi-criteria evaluation, and cellular automata. Drivers of the model included biophysical and socioeconomic variables. Characterization and modeling were performed at two spatial extents and at several management groupings chosen for their relevance to the species0́9 biology and conservation. Two spatial extents approximating areas expected to be used by bats were considered, owing to the importance of scale in species habitat use. The change in the forest proportion of the landscape ranged from 7.38 - 98.99% (mean 74.42% ± 2.31% [90% CI]) in 1992, 4.91 - 95.142% (66.99% ± 2.12%) in 2001, and a projected 3.33 - 78.09% (47.75% ± 2.15%) in 2016. This change represents a 26.67% decrease in the mean proportion of forest surrounding hibernacula projected over 24 years. The mean proportion of developed land was projected to increase by 7.82% by 2016. The extent to which these rates of change in land use and cover will support conservation of the Indiana bat is an important question. LUCC has and will likely trend towards more-isolated forest patches and, in some cases, extremely heterogeneous landscapes. Results indicate that bat populations might best be supported by a certain degree and type of landscape heterogeneity rather than by maximum contiguous forest cover. The major findings of this research are: 1.) Hibernacula with greatest Indiana bat population counts were surrounded by landscapes that were more heterogeneous than hibernacula with lower counts. Bat populations at hibernacula were not highly correlated with forest cover alone as had been predicted. 2.) Privately-owned hibernacula had more heterogeneous landscapes than federally-owned hibernacula. 3.) Landscapes describing the smaller, more proximal expected use area near hibernacula were less heterogeneous than those for the larger expected use area. 4.) Forest cover declined and is projected to decline further in every landscape surrounding hibernacula in this study. 5.) There was no clear pattern among landscape variables and geographic or management groupings. 6.) There was a linear relationship between Indiana bat population counts and landscape variables, including insolation, edge density, and proportion of forest cover.

Range-wide Assessment of Land Use and Cover Change Near Indiana Bat Hibernacula

Range-wide Assessment of Land Use and Cover Change Near Indiana Bat Hibernacula PDF Author: Michael G. Just
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Book Description
It is estimated that 95% of all federally endangered Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis) hibernate in 71 hibernacula in the eastern US. Given the species0́9 high site fidelity, seasonally heightened population densities, and the limited availability of suitable overwintering sites, land use and cover change (LUCC) near hibernacula is expected to affect wintering populations. The landscapes surrounding hibernacula not only provide critical roosting and foraging habitat but also support the highly specific microclimates Indiana bats need for successful hibernation. To date, the assumption has been that the greater the amount of forest cover, the better the habitat for Indiana bats. The extent to which Indiana bat hibernacula may be threatened by LUCC has not been previously investigated. Land adjacent to most hibernacula does not have land use or conservation protections; consequently, it is important that LUCC near hibernacula is evaluated to assess and prevent harmful impacts to wintering Indiana bat populations. Landscape characterizations included measurements of land cover composition and spatial configurations, as well as climate and insolation variables. I modeled potential future LUCC through 2016 near 225 Indiana bat hibernacula using an empirically derived, stochastic projection model that combines Markov chain analysis, multi-criteria evaluation, and cellular automata. Drivers of the model included biophysical and socioeconomic variables. Characterization and modeling were performed at two spatial extents and at several management groupings chosen for their relevance to the species0́9 biology and conservation. Two spatial extents approximating areas expected to be used by bats were considered, owing to the importance of scale in species habitat use. The change in the forest proportion of the landscape ranged from 7.38 - 98.99% (mean 74.42% ± 2.31% [90% CI]) in 1992, 4.91 - 95.142% (66.99% ± 2.12%) in 2001, and a projected 3.33 - 78.09% (47.75% ± 2.15%) in 2016. This change represents a 26.67% decrease in the mean proportion of forest surrounding hibernacula projected over 24 years. The mean proportion of developed land was projected to increase by 7.82% by 2016. The extent to which these rates of change in land use and cover will support conservation of the Indiana bat is an important question. LUCC has and will likely trend towards more-isolated forest patches and, in some cases, extremely heterogeneous landscapes. Results indicate that bat populations might best be supported by a certain degree and type of landscape heterogeneity rather than by maximum contiguous forest cover. The major findings of this research are: 1.) Hibernacula with greatest Indiana bat population counts were surrounded by landscapes that were more heterogeneous than hibernacula with lower counts. Bat populations at hibernacula were not highly correlated with forest cover alone as had been predicted. 2.) Privately-owned hibernacula had more heterogeneous landscapes than federally-owned hibernacula. 3.) Landscapes describing the smaller, more proximal expected use area near hibernacula were less heterogeneous than those for the larger expected use area. 4.) Forest cover declined and is projected to decline further in every landscape surrounding hibernacula in this study. 5.) There was no clear pattern among landscape variables and geographic or management groupings. 6.) There was a linear relationship between Indiana bat population counts and landscape variables, including insolation, edge density, and proportion of forest cover.

Bat Research News

Bat Research News PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bats
Languages : en
Pages : 862

Book Description


Review of the Forest Habitat Relationships of the Indiana Bat (Myotis Sodalis)

Review of the Forest Habitat Relationships of the Indiana Bat (Myotis Sodalis) PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bats
Languages : en
Pages : 32

Book Description


A Review of Forest Habitat Relationships of the Indiana Bat

A Review of Forest Habitat Relationships of the Indiana Bat PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bats
Languages : en
Pages : 52

Book Description


Green Mountain National Forest (N.F.), Forest Plan Revision

Green Mountain National Forest (N.F.), Forest Plan Revision PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 538

Book Description


Summer Ecology of the Indiana Bat (Myotis Sodalis) in an Agricultural Landscape

Summer Ecology of the Indiana Bat (Myotis Sodalis) in an Agricultural Landscape PDF Author: Andrew Broni Kniowski
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 95

Book Description
Abstract: The majority of the summer range of the Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) is within agricultural areas, yet despite known negative effects of agriculture, few studies have examined the ecology of the Indiana bat within a highly agricultural landscape. To evaluate the effects of agriculture on Indiana bats I asked the following questions: 1. Do Indiana bats selectively use habitat within an agriculturally-dominated landscape? 2. Do Indiana bats select habitat differently at different spatial scales within an agricultural landscape? And 3. Do Indiana bats select and use habitat within an agricultural landscape differently than other areas of their range? From a study area along Big Darby Creek in Pickaway Co. Ohio USA, I captured 60 Indiana bats (including five recaptured bats) July-September 2008, April-September 2009, and April-September 2010. I calculated home ranges of 32 individuals that had an average area of 210.5 ha ± 130.6 SD. I used distance based analysis to evaluate habitat selection within the home range, and at 1200 m and 4000 m spatial scales. At each scale, bats selected areas closer to forest and open water and farther from cropland than was expected by chance. The bats heavily used the wooded creek corridor, but also utilized wooded patches in upland areas. I tracked 51 bats to 56 roost trees 474 times. The bats used roost trees in a variety of locations and across a broad area. Most roost trees were located within the wooded creek corridor, but seven were more than 1 km from open water. I evaluated the location of roost trees within the landscape at 1200 m and 4000 m spatial scales. Roost trees were not located randomly at either spatial scale. The only significant factor in both cases was the distance to open water. There was also was a significant difference in physical characteristics of used and available roost trees (A = 0.257, P = 0.025) and primary and secondary roost trees (A = 0.032, P = 0.013). Widely scattered roosts suggest Indiana bat colonies use a broad area within the context of an agricultural landscape. The selection of habitats in a highly agricultural landscape appears similar to other landscapes and the selection is consistent over a broad range of spatial scales. Preserving forested areas with ample supplies of snags within agricultural landscapes, including smaller patches and especially along waterways, should be a conservation priority for the Indiana bat.

Mark Twain National Forest (N.F.), Pineknot Woodland Restoration

Mark Twain National Forest (N.F.), Pineknot Woodland Restoration PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 444

Book Description


Finger Lakes National Forest (N.F.), Land and Resource Management Plan

Finger Lakes National Forest (N.F.), Land and Resource Management Plan PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 176

Book Description


Recovery Plan for the Indiana Bat

Recovery Plan for the Indiana Bat PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Endangered species
Languages : en
Pages : 174

Book Description


Assessing Biodiversity in the Phylogenomic Era

Assessing Biodiversity in the Phylogenomic Era PDF Author: Michael G. Campana
Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
ISBN: 2889741249
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 128

Book Description