Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Interstate and Foreign CommercePublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Aeronautics, Commercial
Languages : en
Pages : 1528
Book Description
pt. 1. April 11-14, 18, 20, 22, 25, 26, and 29, 1949. p. 1-556. pt. 2. May 2, 3, 5, 9, 10, 12, 13, 16, 17, and 19, 1949. pp. 557-992. pt. 3. May 20, 23, 24, 26, 27, 31, June 2, 6, 7, 1949. pp. 993-1472
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Interstate and Foreign CommercePublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Aeronautics, Commercial
Languages : en
Pages : 1528
Book Description
pt. 1. April 11-14, 18, 20, 22, 25, 26, and 29, 1949. p. 1-556. pt. 2. May 2, 3, 5, 9, 10, 12, 13, 16, 17, and 19, 1949. pp. 557-992. pt. 3. May 20, 23, 24, 26, 27, 31, June 2, 6, 7, 1949. pp. 993-1472
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Interstate and Foreign CommercePublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Aeronautics, Commercial
Languages : en
Pages : 1528
Book Description
The Commercial and Financial Chronicle
Author: Congressional Record
Author: United States. CongressPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 1356
Book Description
The Congressional Record is the official record of the proceedings and debates of the United States Congress. It is published daily when Congress is in session. The Congressional Record began publication in 1873. Debates for sessions prior to 1873 are recorded in The Debates and Proceedings in the Congress of the United States (1789-1824), the Register of Debates in Congress (1824-1837), and the Congressional Globe (1833-1873)
Income of Lawyers, 1929-48 ...
Author: William WeinfeldPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Lawyers
Languages : en
Pages : 16
Book Description
Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference
Author: William R. ShadishPublisher: Cengage Learning
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 664
Book Description
Sections include: experiments and generalised causal inference; statistical conclusion validity and internal validity; construct validity and external validity; quasi-experimental designs that either lack a control group or lack pretest observations on the outcome; quasi-experimental designs that use both control groups and pretests; quasi-experiments: interrupted time-series designs; regresssion discontinuity designs; randomised experiments: rationale, designs, and conditions conducive to doing them; practical problems 1: ethics, participation recruitment and random assignment; practical problems 2: treatment implementation and attrition; generalised causal inference: a grounded theory; generalised causal inference: methods for single studies; generalised causal inference: methods for multiple studies; a critical assessment of our assumptions.
LASL Shock Hugoniot Data
Author: Stanley P. MarshPublisher: Univ of California Press
ISBN: 9780520040076
Category : Equations of state
Languages : en
Pages : 684
Book Description
Nationalism in Contemporary Europe
Author: Franjo TuđmanPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : History
Languages : en
Pages : 312
Book Description
A List of the Early Settlers of Georgia
Author: Ellis Merton CoulterPublisher: Genealogical Publishing Com
ISBN: 0806310316
Category : Europe
Languages : en
Pages : 126
Book Description
Information pertaining to each settler consists, generally, of name, age, occupation, place of origin, names of spouse, children and other family members, dates of embarkation and arrival, place of settlement, and date of death. In addition, some of the more notorious aspects of the settlers' lives are recounted in brief, telltale sketches.
Automated Vehicles are Probably Legal in the United States
Author: Bryant Walker SmithPublisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
ISBN: 9781481135177
Category : Motor vehicles
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Note: This is the original 2012 report. An updated 2014 law review article is available as 1 Tex. A&M. L. Rev. 411. This report provides the most comprehensive discussion to date of whether so-called automated, autonomous, self-driving, or driverless vehicles can be lawfully sold and used on public roads in the United States. The short answer is that the computer direction of a motor vehicle's steering, braking, and accelerating without real-time human input is probably legal. The long answer, contained in the report, provides a foundation for tailoring regulations and understanding liability issues related to these vehicles. The report's largely descriptive analysis, which begins with the principle that everything is permitted unless prohibited, covers three key legal regimes: the 1949 Geneva Convention on Road Traffic, regulations enacted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), and the vehicle codes of all fifty US states. The Geneva Convention, to which the United States is a party, probably does not prohibit automated driving. The treaty promotes road safety by establishing uniform rules, one of which requires every vehicle or combination thereof to have a driver who is "at all times ... able to control" it. However, this requirement is likely satisfied if a human is able to intervene in the automated vehicle's operation. NHTSA's regulations, which include the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards to which new vehicles must be certified, do not generally prohibit or uniquely burden automated vehicles, with the possible exception of one rule regarding emergency flashers. State vehicle codes probably do not prohibit-but may complicate-automated driving. These codes assume the presence of licensed human drivers who are able to exercise human judgment, and particular rules may functionally require that presence. New York somewhat uniquely directs a driver to keep one hand on the wheel at all times. In addition, far more common rules mandating reasonable, prudent, practicable, and safe driving have uncertain application to automated vehicles and their users. Following distance requirements may also restrict the lawful operation of tightly spaced vehicle platoons. Many of these issues arise even in the three states that expressly regulate automated vehicles. The primary purpose of this report is to assess the current legal status of automated vehicles. However, the report includes draft language for US states that wish to clarify this status. It also recommends five near-term measures that may help increase legal certainty without producing premature regulation. First, regulators and standards organizations should develop common vocabularies and definitions that are useful in the legal, technical, and public realms. Second, the United States should closely monitor efforts to amend or interpret the 1969 Vienna Convention, which contains language similar to the Geneva Convention but does not bind the United States. Third, NHTSA should indicate the likely scope and schedule of potential regulatory action. Fourth, US states should analyze how their vehicle codes would or should apply to automated vehicles, including those that have an identifiable human operator and those that do not. Finally, additional research on laws applicable to trucks, buses, taxis, low-speed vehicles, and other specialty vehicles may be useful. This is in addition to ongoing research into the other legal aspects of vehicle automation.