Private "Performance Feedback" Reporting for Physicians PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Private "Performance Feedback" Reporting for Physicians PDF full book. Access full book title Private "Performance Feedback" Reporting for Physicians by Department of Health & Human Services. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Department of Health & Human Services Publisher: CreateSpace ISBN: 9781499706499 Category : Medical Languages : en Pages : 40
Book Description
Over the past decade, a growing body of research and online resources has emerged to provide guidance on effective practices for publicly reporting information on provider performance for consumers. These recommendations are for the most part evidence based and assume that an effective report is one that contains performance information that consumers understand and find both credible and relevant. In addition, information is conveyed in a way that makes it as easy as possible for consumers to use it to make good choices among providers. Another key audience for performance reporting is physicians themselves. Health plans and medical groups have sponsored private physician “performance feedback” reports for many years, with the intention of supporting internal quality improvement efforts as well as patient care management. More recently, multistakeholder community quality collaboratives, including roughly half of the Chartered Value Exchanges (CVEs) supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), have begun to produce some type of private report for physicians in parallel to their public report for consumers. These groups recognize that a single report designed for one audience cannot meet the needs of both. In addition, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has sponsored pilot studies of the effects of providing individual physicians and medical groups with performance feedback based on claims data and CMS's Physician Quality Reporting System. In contrast with public reports, private reports are often confidential and limited in distribution to those with a “need to know.” Thus, little research even of a descriptive nature has been conducted on the various forms that private reporting has taken. Limited discussion of how to define and measure the effectiveness of such reports and little published evaluation research are available. Therefore, the science of private “feedback reporting” for physicians is nascent at best. As CVEs and other community quality collaboratives consider strategies for private feedback reporting to physicians and other health care providers, they will need to address basic issues such as report design and distribution. They also will need to examine their role in relation to existing and planned internal performance reporting activities of the health systems and medical practices in their markets. In contrast to public reporting for consumers, where the role of a neutral, multistakeholder collaborative is relatively well accepted as a source of objective, communitywide performance data, the role of community collaboratives in private feedback reporting is not always so clearly defined. Many health plans and health systems, which may themselves be collaborative members, have developed very sophisticated internal reporting systems of their own based on electronic health records. In the context of these and other private performance reporting initiatives, community collaboratives will need to determine the unique value-added features that their private feedback reports can provide. The goal is to complement rather than compete with reports from their provider members or other report sponsors. This resource document is intended to provide practical information and guidance primarily to CVEs and other community quality collaboratives interested in the design, dissemination, and use of private feedback reports on physician performance.
Author: Department of Health & Human Services Publisher: CreateSpace ISBN: 9781499706499 Category : Medical Languages : en Pages : 40
Book Description
Over the past decade, a growing body of research and online resources has emerged to provide guidance on effective practices for publicly reporting information on provider performance for consumers. These recommendations are for the most part evidence based and assume that an effective report is one that contains performance information that consumers understand and find both credible and relevant. In addition, information is conveyed in a way that makes it as easy as possible for consumers to use it to make good choices among providers. Another key audience for performance reporting is physicians themselves. Health plans and medical groups have sponsored private physician “performance feedback” reports for many years, with the intention of supporting internal quality improvement efforts as well as patient care management. More recently, multistakeholder community quality collaboratives, including roughly half of the Chartered Value Exchanges (CVEs) supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), have begun to produce some type of private report for physicians in parallel to their public report for consumers. These groups recognize that a single report designed for one audience cannot meet the needs of both. In addition, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has sponsored pilot studies of the effects of providing individual physicians and medical groups with performance feedback based on claims data and CMS's Physician Quality Reporting System. In contrast with public reports, private reports are often confidential and limited in distribution to those with a “need to know.” Thus, little research even of a descriptive nature has been conducted on the various forms that private reporting has taken. Limited discussion of how to define and measure the effectiveness of such reports and little published evaluation research are available. Therefore, the science of private “feedback reporting” for physicians is nascent at best. As CVEs and other community quality collaboratives consider strategies for private feedback reporting to physicians and other health care providers, they will need to address basic issues such as report design and distribution. They also will need to examine their role in relation to existing and planned internal performance reporting activities of the health systems and medical practices in their markets. In contrast to public reporting for consumers, where the role of a neutral, multistakeholder collaborative is relatively well accepted as a source of objective, communitywide performance data, the role of community collaboratives in private feedback reporting is not always so clearly defined. Many health plans and health systems, which may themselves be collaborative members, have developed very sophisticated internal reporting systems of their own based on electronic health records. In the context of these and other private performance reporting initiatives, community collaboratives will need to determine the unique value-added features that their private feedback reports can provide. The goal is to complement rather than compete with reports from their provider members or other report sponsors. This resource document is intended to provide practical information and guidance primarily to CVEs and other community quality collaboratives interested in the design, dissemination, and use of private feedback reports on physician performance.
Author: U.s. Government Accountability Office Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform ISBN: 9781973956952 Category : Languages : en Pages : 52
Book Description
" Health care payers-including Medicare-are increasingly using VBP to reward the quality and efficiency instead of just the volume of care delivered. Both traditional and newer delivery models use this approach to incentivize providers to improve their performance. Feedback reports serve to inform providers of their results on various measures relative to established targets. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 mandated that GAO compare private entity and Medicare performance feedback reporting activities. GAO examined (1) how and when private entities report performance data to physicians, and what information they report; and (2) how the timing and approach CMS uses to report performance data compare to that of private entities. GAO contacted nine entities-health insurers and statewide collaboratives-recognized for their performance reporting programs. Focusing on physician feedback, GAO obtained information regarding report recipients, data sources used, types of performance measures and benchmarks, frequency of reporting, and efforts to enhance the utility of performance reports. GAO obtained similar information from CMS about its Medicare feedback efforts. "
Author: Christine N. Micklitsch Publisher: Medical Group Management Assn ISBN: 9781568290782 Category : Business & Economics Languages : en Pages : 140
Book Description
This book guides you through the process, covering such essential steps as the movement toward physician performance management, the physician leader's role, conducting the review, integrating compensation and addressing physician behavior.
Author: OECD Publisher: OECD Publishing ISBN: 9264805907 Category : Languages : en Pages : 447
Book Description
This volume, developed by the Observatory together with OECD, provides an overall conceptual framework for understanding and applying strategies aimed at improving quality of care. Crucially, it summarizes available evidence on different quality strategies and provides recommendations for their implementation. This book is intended to help policy-makers to understand concepts of quality and to support them to evaluate single strategies and combinations of strategies.
Author: James Cosgrove Publisher: ISBN: 9781457854125 Category : Languages : en Pages : 51
Book Description
Health care payers -- including Medicare -- are increasingly using value-based payment (VBP) to reward the quality and efficiency instead of just the volume of care delivered. Both traditional and newer delivery models use this approach to incentivize providers to improve their performance. Feedback reports serve to inform providers of their results on various measures relative to established targets. This report examined (1) how and when private entities report performance data to physicians, and what information they report; and (2) how the timing and approach that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) uses to report performance data compare to that of private entities. Tables and figures. This is a print on demand report.
Author: Robert Marder Publisher: ISBN: 9781578393596 Category : Medical Languages : en Pages : 111
Book Description
Physician profiling to assess physicians' competence is essential in the reappointment process. But more important than simply reappointing physicians, Medical Staff leaders must provide meaningful feedback to help them improve their quality of care. To do that, they must decide what data to collect, how to collect it, and how to communicate it to help physicians improve performance. HCPro's new book: 10 Steps to Successful Physician Profiling: How to Achieve Excellent Physician Performance, shows how to create and use "physician performance feedback reports," a tool that makes it easier to communicate meaningful data to physicians, to help them change their behavior. Customizable CD-ROM included: 10 Steps to Successful Physician Profiling: How to Achieve Excellent Physician Performance comes with a customizable color-coded physician performance report. The CD-ROM consolidates collected data - from clinical quality, service quality, and activity to resource utilization and even peer relationships - and creates a functional color display so physicians can easily see where they need to improve. Pre-calculated formulas show performance trends and help communicate to physicians where they rank in comparison to their peers
Author: Robert J. Marder Publisher: Hcpro, a Division of Simplify Compliance ISBN: 9781601469656 Category : Professional standards review organizations (Medicine) Languages : en Pages : 0
Book Description
Effective Peer Review The Complete Guide to Physician Performance Improvement, Third Edition Robert J. Marder, MD Peer review continues to rate as a top problematic issue in healthcare organizations. Even if they are meeting regulatory standards, most organizations struggle to develop a peer review program that is meaningful to physicians, causing them to become resistant to this performance measurement tool. This new edition explains the connection between peer review, OPPE, and FPPE. It also contains updated information on OPPE and FPPE as related to The Joint Commission''s standards. This book also incorporates three previous books: Effective Peer Review, Peer Review Best Practices, and Measuring Physician Competency. Now readers have one, all-encompassing resource to answer their peer review and physician performance questions. This completely updated book will help you: Engage physicians in the peer review process Create tools to recognize and celebrate excellence Design OPPE profiles and create a plan for distributing the information to physicians Eliminate bias and improve case reviewer efficiency Determine if your peer review policies comply with regulatory standards Take a look at the Table of Contents: Chapter 1: Peer Review: Why Do We Need to Measure Physician Competence? What Peer Review Is What Peer Review Is Not Who Is a Peer? Impartiality and Conflicts of interest Sham Peer Reviews The Duty to Perform Effective Peer Review Should Physicians Be Paid to Perform Peer Reviews? Chapter 2: From Punitive to Positive: Creating a Performance Improvement Culture for Peer Review How Can Culture Change? Values of a Performance Improvement-Focused Peer Review Culture Peer Review and the Just Culture Chapter 3: Legal Considerations: Impact of Regulations and Liability on Peer Review Redefining Peer Review: OPPE, FPPE, and the Core Competencies How the Standards Apply Peer Review Protection Laws Affirmative Duty to Keep Information Confidential Fair Hearings The National Practitioner Data Bank Negligent Peer Review Chapter 4: Peer Review Structures: The Impact of Multi-Specialty Peer Review Peer Review Structures: Three Primary Functions Goals for Peer Review Redesign Basic Peer Review Models Who Should Oversee Peer Review? Selecting the Right Model Physician Behavior: Who Should Handle It? Chapter 5: Measuring Physician Performance: What to Measure and How to Do It Fairly? What Is a Physician Performance Indicator? Indicator Validity: Selecting Physician-Driven Measures What Are You Required to Measure? What to Measure: Structure, Process, and Outcome How to Measure Physicians Fairly: Review, Rate, and Rule Indicators Understanding and Improving Risk- Adjusted Data Using Perception Data to Evaluate Physician Performance Case Study Indicator Selection Chapter 6: Case Review: Reducing Bias and Improving Reviewer Efficiency and Effectiveness Standardizing the Case Review Process Case Identification and Screening Physician Reviewer Assignment Physician Review and Initial Case Rating Initial Committee Review and Physician Input Committee Decision and Improvement Opportunity Identification Communication of Findings and Follow-Up Accountability Case Rating Systems Case Review and the Electronic Age Chapter 7: Selecting Physician-Driven Measures for OPPE: Understanding and Applying the Six Core Competencies ACGME, ABMS, and The Joint Commission: Where Did the Core Competencies Come From and How Are They Used? Alternative Frameworks to the Core Competencies Using the Competency Statement and Expectations to Drive Physician Performance Measures Applying the Core Competencies to OPPE Chapter 8: Physician Data Attribution: Making OPPE Data Meaningful to Individual Physicians Using Imprecise Data for OPPE Attribution and Case Review Improving Attribution for Process Measures Outcome Measure Attribution in a Multiple-Provider World Attribution and Patient Satisfaction Data Chapter 9: Evaluating OPPE Data: Using Benchmarks and Targets for FPPE and the Pursuit of Excellence Understanding Normative Data Interpreting OPPE Data for a Time Interval How to Set Indicator Targets Targets for Indicator Types Interpreting OPPE Data for Trends Chapter 10: From OPPE to FPPE: Creating Accountability for Physician Performance Improvement Accountability for FPPE Initiation, Monitoring, and Follow-Up Designing an Effective FPPE Plan Getting Physician Buy-In for Improvement Opportunities and FPPE What Happens If FPPE Fails? Chapter 11: OPPE Profiles and Physician Performance Feedback: Practical Principles for Competency Report Design and Distribution OPPE Profile and Physician Performance Feedback Report: What Is the Difference? Designing the Report Define the Principles: 10 Questions to Guide Your Design Create a Format That Reflects the Design Principles Preparing and Distributing Competency Data Reports Develop the Infrastructure and Support Materials Pilot-Test Your Design Create a Policy for Physician Competency Reports Chapter 12: External Peer Review in a Physician Improvement Culture EPR Uses The EPR Policy What Circumstances Typically Require EPR? Who Determines When EPR Is Needed? Who Will Select the Reviewer? How Will the Cases Be Selected? Who Will Review the EPR Report Findings? How Will the Results Be Used? Beyond Case-Based EPR: Physician Assessment Programs Chapter 13: Reporting Peer Review: What Does the Board Need to Know? Contemporary Board Accountabilities for Hospital Quality What Keeps the Board Awake at Night? Filling In the Knowledge Gap: Helping Boards Understand Physician Competency Measurement What Data Should the Board Get? Chapter 14: Running an Effective Peer Review Committee Meeting Elements of an Effective Meeting Role of the Committee Chair Responsibilities of Committee Members in Meeting Preparation and Management Practical Tips for Managing Committee Discussion to Avoid Wasting Physician Time Chapter 15: Beyond the Hospital Walls: Peer Review in Ambulatory Care and ACOs Why Would You Want to Do Peer Review in a Nonhospital Setting? Can You Do Peer Review in the Nonhospital Setting? What Data Can You Obtain From the Hospital and What Are You Willing to Share? Peer Review Outside the Hospital: How Should You Organize It? Peer Review Outside the Hospital: What Can You Measure? Chapter 16: Creating Effective Peer Review Policies and Procedures What Do Your Policies and Procedures Need to Cover? Redesigning Your Peer Review Program: A Step-by-Step Guide Should You Do This Yourself or Get Some Help?
Author: Mark W. Friedberg Publisher: Rand Corporation ISBN: 0833082205 Category : Medical Languages : en Pages : 149
Book Description
This report presents the results of a series of surveys and semistructured interviews intended to identify and characterize determinants of physician professional satisfaction.
Author: Department of Health & Human Services
Author: Department of Health & Human Services
Author: United States. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Author: U.s. Government Accountability Office
Author: Christine N. Micklitsch
Author: OECD
Author: James Cosgrove
Author: Robert Marder
Author: Robert J. Marder
Author: Mark W. Friedberg
Author: Stephanie Teleki