Preliminary Advanced Test Reactor LEU Fuel Conversion Feasibility Study PDF Download

Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Preliminary Advanced Test Reactor LEU Fuel Conversion Feasibility Study PDF full book. Access full book title Preliminary Advanced Test Reactor LEU Fuel Conversion Feasibility Study by G. S. Chang. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.

Preliminary Advanced Test Reactor LEU Fuel Conversion Feasibility Study

Preliminary Advanced Test Reactor LEU Fuel Conversion Feasibility Study PDF Author: G. S. Chang
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Book Description
The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) is a high power density, high neutron flux research reactor operating in the United States. The ATR has large irradiation test volumes located in high flux areas. Powered with highly enriched uranium (HEU), the ATR has a maximum thermal power rating of 250 MWth with a maximum unperturbed thermal neutron flux rating of 1.0 x 1015 n/cm2-s. As a result, the ATR is a representative candidate for assessing the necessary modifications and evaluating the subsequentoperating effects associated with low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel conversion. A detailed plate-by-plate MCNP ATR 1/8th core model was developed for the fuel cycle burnup comparison analysis. Using the current HEU 235U enrichment of 93.0 % as a baseline, an analysis can be performed to determine the LEU uranium density and 235U enrichment required in the fuel meat to yield an equivalent Keff between the HEU core and a LEU core versus effective full power days (EFPD). The MCNP ATR 1/8th core model will be used to optimize the 235U loading in the LEU core, such that the differences in Keff between the HEU and LEU core can be minimized for operation at 150 EFPD with a total core power of 115 MW. The Monte-Carlo with ORIGEN-2 (MCWO) method was used to calculate Keff versus EFPDs. The MCWO-calculated results for the LEU case demonstrated adequate excess reactivity such that the LEU core conversion designer should be able to optimize the 235U content of each fuel plate, so that the Keff and relative radial fission heat flux profile aresimilar to the reference ATR HEU case. However, to demonstrate that the LEU core fuel cycle performance can meet the Upgraded Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) safety requirements, a further study will be required in order to investigate the detailed radial, axial, and azimuthal heat flux profile variations versus EFPDs.