Perceptions of Student Participation in University Government in a Complex University Campus

Perceptions of Student Participation in University Government in a Complex University Campus PDF Author: Alvin Russell Kyte
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 302

Book Description


Student Perceptions of Their Roles in the Governance of College Unions and the Impact of Participation on Student Development

Student Perceptions of Their Roles in the Governance of College Unions and the Impact of Participation on Student Development PDF Author: Jeanne L. Higbee
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Student government
Languages : en
Pages : 348

Book Description


University Governance

University Governance PDF Author: Fitcher L. Weathington (Jr.)
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 140

Book Description


A Longitudinal Study of Selected Changes in the Perception of the University Environment as Held by Students who Participate in Two Forms of University Governance

A Longitudinal Study of Selected Changes in the Perception of the University Environment as Held by Students who Participate in Two Forms of University Governance PDF Author: Arthur Grant Underwood
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : College environment
Languages : en
Pages : 162

Book Description
The purpose of this study was to investigate the change in perception of the university environment that occurred in students who participated in two forms of university governance at Oregon State University. Students who participated as members of joint student-faculty committees (university committees) were compared with members of all-student committees. The time span of the study covered one academic year. The College University Environment Scales was the instrument utilized to measure the students' perceptions of the university environment. Additional data was obtained from the students' files in the Office of the Dean of Students. The sample used in testing the hypotheses included 102 students. Group I consisted of 51 members of university committees. Group II consisted of 51 members of all-student committees. The data was subjected to statistical analysis to determine the validity of the following hypotheses: 1. There is no significant difference in the amount of change in the perception of the university environment (as measured by the seven scales of the College University Environment Scales) between student participants on university committees and student participants on all-student government committees, for either male or female members. 2. There is no significant change in the student's perception of the university environment (as measured by the seven scales of the College University Environment Scales) among those participants on university committees for either males or females. 3. There is no significant difference in the amount of change in the student's perception of the university environment (as measured by the seven scales of the College University Environment Scales), among those participating on all-student government committees, for either males or females. All hypotheses were accepted at the .05 and . 01 levels of significance. The following conclusions were drawn from the findings of this study: 1. Students who participate in university government view the university environment in a similar fashion. 2. Male and female student participants in university government view the university environment in a similar fashion. 3. Student participation in university government resulted in no significant change from previously held perceptions of the university environment. 4. Student participants on university committees do not view the university environment significantly different from student participants on all-student committees. The major limitation of the study was the small sample size available for study.

Student Participation in University Governance

Student Participation in University Governance PDF Author: Fatema Hossain
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Book Description
"Abstract This qualitative study explored the perceptions of students who were involved in the governance process of a case university. The focus of the study was to learn how the university context contributes, or not, to participation in student governance. More specifically, the questions that guided the study were: "How do students become involved in university governance?", "What were the kinds of governance activities in which they were involved?", and "What issues and/or challenges did the student representatives encounter, or not, while participating in governance?" The data sources included student interviews, professor interviews, field notes, and university public documents. Constant comparison analysis of the student interviews resulted in eight descriptive categories from which three major themes emerged. The first theme, "governing framework," included the complex arrangement of subcategories, disciplined governing, and executing responsibilities. This theme revealed the complex organization of university and student associations, their functions and the significance of their role in university governance. The descriptive sub-categories participatory factors, interactional factors, and personal propensity of students were merged into the "enticing involvement" theme, which helped anticipate students' participation in university governance processes and how the university could further support their involvement. Students' personal reluctance, role definitions and sense of belongingness established the conceptual theme, "defining the line." These themes reflected the overall university governance process and the corresponding student engagement status. Exploration of the governance process of a large Canadian university through students' eyes revealed many examples of "micro-aggressions". Such incidents of micro-aggression were not very evident to casual observers and people around students. Even though these micro-aggressions were not intentional, students faced problems that included, but were not limited to, gender-specific biases, racial biases, student-specific biases, and so forth. Students felt that such occurrences had occurred as they were inferior to any other group of university. Finally it had been suggested that mainstream students should be recognized as a specific type of stakeholder of university, which could counter the problems faced by students. Future research should explore the issue involving students, professors, administrators, and other stakeholders." --

Should Students Share the Power?

Should Students Share the Power? PDF Author: Earl J. McGrath
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 140

Book Description


The Impact of Student Participation in University Governance as Perceived by Students

The Impact of Student Participation in University Governance as Perceived by Students PDF Author: Janice Abel
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : College student government
Languages : en
Pages : 314

Book Description


Student Participation in Academic Governance

Student Participation in Academic Governance PDF Author: Lora H. Robinson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : College student government
Languages : en
Pages : 56

Book Description


College Presidents' Perceptions of Student Participation in Administrative Decision Making in the Two-year College

College Presidents' Perceptions of Student Participation in Administrative Decision Making in the Two-year College PDF Author: Charles D. Buroker
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Junior colleges
Languages : en
Pages : 214

Book Description


Student Success in College

Student Success in College PDF Author: George D. Kuh
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons
ISBN: 1118046854
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 422

Book Description
Student Success in College describes policies, programs, and practices that a diverse set of institutions have used to enhance student achievement. This book clearly shows the benefits of student learning and educational effectiveness that can be realized when these conditions are present. Based on the Documenting Effective Educational Practice (DEEP) project from the Center for Postsecondary Research at Indiana University, this book provides concrete examples from twenty institutions that other colleges and universities can learn from and adapt to help create a success-oriented campus culture and learning environment.