Nonproliferation Programs of the Department of State PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Nonproliferation Programs of the Department of State PDF full book. Access full book title Nonproliferation Programs of the Department of State by United States Senate. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: United States Senate Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 110
Book Description
Nonproliferation programs of the Department of State: hearing before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, One Hundred Eighth Congress, first session, March 19, 2003.
Author: United States Senate Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 110
Book Description
Nonproliferation programs of the Department of State: hearing before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, One Hundred Eighth Congress, first session, March 19, 2003.
Author: United States. Congress Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform ISBN: 9781985611207 Category : Languages : en Pages : 110
Book Description
Nonproliferation programs of the Department of State : hearing before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, One Hundred Eighth Congress, first session, March 19, 2003.
Author: Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 9
Book Description
The proliferation of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons is a serious problem for international security. Consequently the U.S. government has established an array of programs to fund activities that will inhibit this activity. The problem of proliferation and defense conversion, in general, is quite complicated. The most immediate concern is the actual diversion of weapons materials. In the long term; however, weapons of mass destruction must be destroyed in a safe and environmentally sound manner. Ultimately the solution of the proliferation problem lies in the redirection of the intellectual skills of weapons scientists and engineers to peaceful commercial activities. At the present time the economic conditions in the New Independent States create severe pressure on people with critical weapons knowledge to sell their skills to political entities that are dangerous. There are four programs to be discussed in this paper. The first is the {open_quotes}Nunn-Lugar{close_quotes} program which is the largest and is administered by the Department of Defense. Between FY92 and FY94 Congress authorized $1.2B for this activity which is aimed at weapons destruction, storage, and safeguards. The second is the International Science and Technology Center in Moscow and the Science Center about to open in Ukraine. These are joint efforts involving the U.S., the European Community, and Japan to fund projects to prevent proliferation and foster commercial technological activity in Russia, Georgia, and Ukraine. The New Independent States - Industrial Partnering Program is a $35M (FY94) program jointly administered by the Department of Energy and the Department of State.
Author: United States Government Accountability Office Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform ISBN: 9781978414129 Category : Languages : en Pages : 64
Book Description
Department of State: Nonproliferation, Anti-terrorism, Demining, and Related Programs Follow Legal Authority, but Some Activities Need Reassessment
Author: Gary Jones Publisher: ISBN: Category : Nuclear arms control Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
This testimony discusses GAO's recent work on U.S. nonproliferation programs and comments on S. 673--a bill to establish an interagency committee to review and coordinate such programs. GAO found that the U.S. programs have achieved some success, but more needs to be done to keep nuclear weapons, materials, and technologies out of the hands of terrorists and countries of concern. Furthermore, questions exist about how to sustain the security improvements being made. The Department of Energy (DOE) and the Department of State programs to employ weapons scientists face difficulty in conclusively demonstrating that they are preventing the spread of weapons-related knowledge and expertise. With respect to S. 673, there is some debate among officials about the need for more coordination of U.S. nonproliferation programs. On the basis of the findings of two independent commissions that recently examined these programs, GAO believes that more coordination would be helpful and that the legislation could serve as a vehicle to share information and best practices for addressing problems GAO identified. S. 673 could be strengthened by mandating development of an overarching strategic plan that clearly identifies overall goals, time frames for meeting those goals, and ways to set priorities for allocating resources to address U.S. nonproliferation concerns.
Author: United States. Government Accountability Office Publisher: ISBN: Category : National security Languages : en Pages : 78
Book Description
To address concerns about unemployed or underemployed Soviet-era weapons scientists in Russia and other countries, the Department of Energy (DOE) established the Initiatives for Proliferation Prevention (IPP) program in 1994 to engage former Soviet weapons scientists in nonmilitary work in the short term and create private sector jobs for these scientists in the long term. GAO assessed (1) DOE's reported accomplishments for the IPP program, (2) DOE's exit strategy for the program, and (3) the extent to which the program has experienced annual carryovers of unspent funds and the reasons for any such carryovers. To address these issues, GAO analyzed DOE policies, plans, and budgets and interviewed key program officials and representatives from 22 Russian and Ukrainian institutes. GAO recommends, among other things, that DOE assess the continuing need for the IPP program with input from other federal agencies, including State and the intelligence community. DOE and State generally agreed with GAO's recommendations, although DOE disagreed with the need to reassess the IPP program. However, the nature, scope, and volume of problems GAO identified during the course of its review necessitates such a reassessment to ensure that limited IPP program funds are directed to the scientists and institutes of highest proliferation risk.
Author: United States Senate
Author: United States Senate
Author: United States. Congress
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations
Author: 
Author: 
Author: United States. General Accounting Office
Author: United States Government Accountability Office
Author: Gary Jones
Author: 
Author: United States. Government Accountability Office