Nitrification Inhibitor, Nitrogen Source, and Herbicide Effects on Soil Bitrogen Transformations and Corn Yield PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Nitrification Inhibitor, Nitrogen Source, and Herbicide Effects on Soil Bitrogen Transformations and Corn Yield PDF full book. Access full book title Nitrification Inhibitor, Nitrogen Source, and Herbicide Effects on Soil Bitrogen Transformations and Corn Yield by William Neels. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: William Neels Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 0
Book Description
Nitrogen is the most limiting nutrient for crop production; however, its management has been challenging due to increasing nitrogen losses. Increased N losses have led researchers to focus on strategies for improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE). In this study, we took an integrated approach to compare the effects of N source, nitrification inhibitor and herbicide on nitrification, N loss, crop yield, residual N, and NUE. We first evaluated these factors in a twoyear field experiment. A laboratory soil incubation experiment followed. The treatments included a combination of nitrification inhibitor vs. no inhibitor, two nitrogen fertilizer sources (broadcast urea vs. injected aqueous ammonia), and a pre-emergence herbicide vs. no herbicide. Results indicated that nitrogen source has a more significant effect on NH4 + -N retention (78-80% higher in anhydrous ammonia vs. urea) than nitrification inhibitor (24-47% higher with inhibitor vs. without inhibitor) and herbicides. Similarly, nitrogen source significantly affected NO3 - -N formation (134-176% lower in anhydrous ammonia vs. urea) than nitrification inhibitor (8-31% lower with inhibitor vs. without inhibitor) and herbicides. We then evaluated the effect of nitrification inhibitor, nitrogen fertilizer source, and herbicide on (1) soil nitrification through a 25 day-soil incubation and (2) NH3 volatilization, NO3 - -N leaching, and N2O emissions through a 31-day soil column study using a loamy sand soil. Results indicated that nitrogen source had a greater effect on reducing nitrification (32.5% lower with injected aqueous ammonia vs. surface broadcast urea) compared to nitrification inhibitors (4% lower with inhibitor vs. without inhibitor) and herbicide (no effect). Surface broadest urea increased NH3 volatilization by 673% compared to injected aqueous ammonia. Injected aqueous ammonia had 22% higher NO3 - -N leaching and 33 % higher NH4 + -N leaching than urea, while nitrification inhibitor had an inconsistent effect on NO3 - -N leaching across both N sources. The results of both experiments indicated that nitrogen source plays a more significant role in regulating soil nitrogen losses than nitrification inhibitors and herbicide..
Author: William Neels Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 0
Book Description
Nitrogen is the most limiting nutrient for crop production; however, its management has been challenging due to increasing nitrogen losses. Increased N losses have led researchers to focus on strategies for improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE). In this study, we took an integrated approach to compare the effects of N source, nitrification inhibitor and herbicide on nitrification, N loss, crop yield, residual N, and NUE. We first evaluated these factors in a twoyear field experiment. A laboratory soil incubation experiment followed. The treatments included a combination of nitrification inhibitor vs. no inhibitor, two nitrogen fertilizer sources (broadcast urea vs. injected aqueous ammonia), and a pre-emergence herbicide vs. no herbicide. Results indicated that nitrogen source has a more significant effect on NH4 + -N retention (78-80% higher in anhydrous ammonia vs. urea) than nitrification inhibitor (24-47% higher with inhibitor vs. without inhibitor) and herbicides. Similarly, nitrogen source significantly affected NO3 - -N formation (134-176% lower in anhydrous ammonia vs. urea) than nitrification inhibitor (8-31% lower with inhibitor vs. without inhibitor) and herbicides. We then evaluated the effect of nitrification inhibitor, nitrogen fertilizer source, and herbicide on (1) soil nitrification through a 25 day-soil incubation and (2) NH3 volatilization, NO3 - -N leaching, and N2O emissions through a 31-day soil column study using a loamy sand soil. Results indicated that nitrogen source had a greater effect on reducing nitrification (32.5% lower with injected aqueous ammonia vs. surface broadcast urea) compared to nitrification inhibitors (4% lower with inhibitor vs. without inhibitor) and herbicide (no effect). Surface broadest urea increased NH3 volatilization by 673% compared to injected aqueous ammonia. Injected aqueous ammonia had 22% higher NO3 - -N leaching and 33 % higher NH4 + -N leaching than urea, while nitrification inhibitor had an inconsistent effect on NO3 - -N leaching across both N sources. The results of both experiments indicated that nitrogen source plays a more significant role in regulating soil nitrogen losses than nitrification inhibitors and herbicide..
Author: L. Fred Welch Publisher: ISBN: Category : Crops and nitrogen Languages : en Pages : 60
Book Description
Most plants absorbmore nitrogen than any other nutrient. Because the amount needed is so large and easily be lost from many soils, nitrogen is usually the most limiting nutrient for plant growth. Although about 79 percent of the atmosphere is nitrogen, only nitrogen-fixingplants such as legumeswith their associated bacteria are able to use this abundant source. The nonleguminous grain crops must receive supplemental nitrogen to produce satisfactory yields. Until the last few decades the supply of available nitrogen in the soil was increased primarily by legumes and manure. These sources should be used when economically feasible, but many important grain-producing areas of the world must now rely on commercial fertilizer nitrogen. For economic reasons researchers and growers have been interested for many years in improving yields from each unit of nitrogen. Recently, however, the efficient use of nitrogen has become an environmental issue as well, because high nitrate concentrations in water may be harmful to humans, especiali infants, and to livestock. If plants absorb more of the addedfertilizer nitrogen, then less is likely to leach from fields into drinking water. Improving nitrogen efficiency has also become crucial in order to conserve dwinling supplies of natural gas, which is used in large quantities to manufacture nitrogenfertilizers.
Author: Kathryn Jackson Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
Manure applied in early with warmer temperatures can have higher nitrification rates and nitrogen loss potential, but waiting for cooler conditions in later fall risks an early winter conditions that may prevent application. Nitrate is susceptible to leaching and denitrification, which potentially could be minimized by including a nitrification inhibitor (NI) when applying manure. In this three-year study on corn, nitrapyrin was incorporated into liquid hog manure and applied at various fall timings and in spring. Soil samples were collected in the preceding fall, spring, and post-harvest, and plant nitrogen content, grain and stover were measured in the growing season. The seasonal manure application timing had a greater impact on plant responses than including the inhibitor, with spring manure applications having greater yields. It was found that there was an optimal window in November where fall-applied manure treatments had an economic benefit to being applied with a nitrification inhibitor.
Author: Robert W. Pearson Publisher: ISBN: Category : Nitrogen fertilizers Languages : en Pages : 24
Book Description
Nitrogen fertilizer broadcast in November or December on widely different soils at seven locations in Alabama, Georgia, and Mississippi during 1955-59 was only 49 percent as effective as nitrogen fertilizer applied the following spring when measured by corn yields. In terms of nitrogen recovered, the relative effectiveness was 62 percent. There were no consistent differences among the five nitrogen sources applied in the fall as measured by corn yields, but nitrogen recovery tended to be lower from urea than from the other sources. Considerable residual effects of spring-applied nitrogen were found over a period of 16 months based on both yield and nitrogen uptake by the crops. Average uptakes of 25 and 34 pounds per acre of additional nitrogen were made by the second and third crops, respectively, from the 200-pound original application. This residual nitrogen produced average yield increases of 1,600 pounds of dry forage and 19 bushels of corn per acre. These results emphasize the economic importance of residual nitrogen and the need for soil test procedures for its estimation.
Author: Kyle Gustav Jensen Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 138
Book Description
Nitrogen fertilization is necessary to obtain respectable corn yields. Loss of nitrogen applied to the soil can significantly decrease yields. Suppressing the rate of nitrogen oxidation into a form that can be leached from the root zone may increase N use efficiency. The use of a nitrification inhibitor (nitrapyrin) has been shown to protect crop yield and groundwater quality when leaching conditions exist. Two year studies were conducted to determine the efficacy of reformulated nitrapyrin (Stay-N) when used with urea-ammonium nitrate solutions (liquid N fertilizer) and liquid swine manure upon corn yields. The liquid N studies were conducted in 2000 and 2001 at the Northwest Iowa Research Farm on a Galva soil (Typic Hapludoll) and in Central Iowa at the Burkey Farm on a Nicollet soil (Aquic Hapludoll). Treatments were arranged in split-plot, randomized, complete block design replicated four times. Main plots were Stay-N treatments, with (0.56 kg ai ha−1) or without Stay-N. Sub-plots were seven different rates of nitrogen: 0, 45, 90, 135, 180, 225, and 270 kg ha−1. Stay-N was mixed with the urea-ammonium nitrate solutions and sprayed on the appropriate plots using a small plot fertilizer applicator. The liquid swine manure study was conducted in 2001 and 2002 at the Armstrong Research Farm near Lewis, Iowa on a Colo soil (Cumulic Endoaquoll). The study was arranged in a randomized complete block design replicated four times. Liquid swine manure was applied to the plots to supply 0, 90, and 179 kg ha−1 of nitrogen. Stay-N rates were 0, 0.56, 1.12, and 2.24 kg ai ha−1. Stay-N was mixed with the swine manure before treatments were injected into the soil. Environmental conditions did not favor N losses during the time the studies were conducted.
Author: Arvin Mosier Publisher: Island Press ISBN: 1597267430 Category : Science Languages : en Pages : 320
Book Description
Nitrogen is an essential element for plant growth and development and a key agricultural input-but in excess it can lead to a host of problems for human and ecological health. Across the globe, distribution of fertilizer nitrogen is very uneven, with some areas subject to nitrogen pollution and others suffering from reduced soil fertility, diminished crop production, and other consequences of inadequate supply. Agriculture and the Nitrogen Cycle provides a global assessment of the role of nitrogen fertilizer in the nitrogen cycle. The focus of the book is regional, emphasizing the need to maintain food and fiber production while minimizing environmental impacts where fertilizer is abundant, and the need to enhance fertilizer utilization in systems where nitrogen is limited. The book is derived from a workshop held by the Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE) in Kampala, Uganda, that brought together the world's leading scientists to examine and discuss the nitrogen cycle and related problems. It contains an overview chapter that summarizes the group's findings, four chapters on cross-cutting issues, and thirteen background chapters. The book offers a unique synthesis and provides an up-to-date, broad perspective on the issues of nitrogen fertilizer in food production and the interaction of nitrogen and the environment.
Author: William Neels
Author: William Neels
Author: L. Fred Welch
Author: Kathryn Jackson
Author: Robert W. Pearson
Author: Kyle Gustav Jensen
Author: Edward H. Earles
Author: Arvin Mosier
Author: Michael Schmitt
Author: George William Rehm
Author: James Stuart Schepers