Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Aeronautics
Languages : en
Pages : 1556
Book Description
Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports
NASA/DOD Aerospace Knowledge Diffusion Research Project. Report 14: Engineering Work and Information Use in Aerospace: Results of a Telephone Survey
NASA/DOD Aerospace Knowledge Diffusion Research Project. Report 15: Technical Uncertainty and Project Complexity as Correlates of Information Use by US Industry-affiliated Aerospace Engineers and Scientists: Results of an Exploratory Investigation
Monthly Catalog of United States Government Publications
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 720
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 720
Book Description
Monthly Catalogue, United States Public Documents
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 1790
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 1790
Book Description
Government Reports Annual Index
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Research
Languages : en
Pages : 1828
Book Description
Sections 1-2. Keyword Index.--Section 3. Personal author index.--Section 4. Corporate author index.-- Section 5. Contract/grant number index, NTIS order/report number index 1-E.--Section 6. NTIS order/report number index F-Z.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Research
Languages : en
Pages : 1828
Book Description
Sections 1-2. Keyword Index.--Section 3. Personal author index.--Section 4. Corporate author index.-- Section 5. Contract/grant number index, NTIS order/report number index 1-E.--Section 6. NTIS order/report number index F-Z.
NASA/DOD Aerospace Knowledge Diffusion Research Project. Paper 16: A Comparison of the Technical Communications Practices of Russian and US Aerospace Engineers and Scientists
Nasa/Dod Aerospace Knowledge Diffusion Research Project. Report 13
Author: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
ISBN: 9781722403645
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 30
Book Description
A telephone survey of U.S. aerospace engineers and scientists belonging to the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) was conducted between December 4, 1991 and January 5, 1992. The survey was undertaken to (1) validate the telephone survey as an appropriate technique for collecting data from U.S. aerospace engineers and scientists; (2) collect information about how the results of NASA/DoD aerospace research are used in the R&D process; (3) identify those selection criteria which affect the use of federally-funded aerospace R&D; and (4) obtain information that could be used to develop a self-administered mail questionnaire for use with the same population. The average rating of importance of U.S. government technical reports was 2.5 (on a 4-point scale); The mean/median number of times U.S. government technical reports were used per 6 months was 8/2. Factors scoring highest for U.S. government technical reports were technical accuracy (2.9), reliable data and technical information (2.8), and contains comprehensive data and information (2.7) on a 4-point system. The factors scoring highest for influencing the use of U.S. government technical reports were relevance (3.1), technical accuracy (3.06), and reliable data/information (3.02). Ease of use, familiarity, technical accuracy, and relevance correlated with use of U.S. government technical reports. Survey demographics, survey questionnaire, and the NASA/DoD Aerospace Knowledge Diffusion Research Project publications list are included. Pinelli, Thomas E. and Glassman, Nanci A. Langley Research Center RTOP 505-90-00...
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
ISBN: 9781722403645
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 30
Book Description
A telephone survey of U.S. aerospace engineers and scientists belonging to the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) was conducted between December 4, 1991 and January 5, 1992. The survey was undertaken to (1) validate the telephone survey as an appropriate technique for collecting data from U.S. aerospace engineers and scientists; (2) collect information about how the results of NASA/DoD aerospace research are used in the R&D process; (3) identify those selection criteria which affect the use of federally-funded aerospace R&D; and (4) obtain information that could be used to develop a self-administered mail questionnaire for use with the same population. The average rating of importance of U.S. government technical reports was 2.5 (on a 4-point scale); The mean/median number of times U.S. government technical reports were used per 6 months was 8/2. Factors scoring highest for U.S. government technical reports were technical accuracy (2.9), reliable data and technical information (2.8), and contains comprehensive data and information (2.7) on a 4-point system. The factors scoring highest for influencing the use of U.S. government technical reports were relevance (3.1), technical accuracy (3.06), and reliable data/information (3.02). Ease of use, familiarity, technical accuracy, and relevance correlated with use of U.S. government technical reports. Survey demographics, survey questionnaire, and the NASA/DoD Aerospace Knowledge Diffusion Research Project publications list are included. Pinelli, Thomas E. and Glassman, Nanci A. Langley Research Center RTOP 505-90-00...