La Prueba Jurídica de la Culpabilidad en el Nuevo Sistema Penal PDF Download

Author: Carlos Arturo Gómez Pavajeau
Publisher: U. Externado de Colombia
ISBN: 9587107454
Category : Law
Languages : es
Pages : 16

View

Book Description
La Universidad prepara y entrena al abogado teóricamente para los aspectos de la valoración formal y material de la prueba; no obstante, resulta claro que la manera de probar las instituciones jurídicas, con lo cual se enfrenta en su ejercicio profesional, es asunto librado a un aprendizaje basado en "ensayo y error", pues el mismo se adquiere paulatinamente a golpe de fracasos y triunfos, por lo que en gran medida se encuentra sujeto al azar. La falencia anotada tiene a la par también la carencia de textos o estudios que promuevan acabar con el inmenso precipicio que existe entre teoría y práctica, razón por la cual el presente trabajo busca abrir nuevos horizontes en el estudio de las pruebas, muy especialmente en la temática que en otras latitudes se ha dado en llamar "probática jurídica" y con respecto a la prueba del aspecto subjetivo del delito, el reto más grande y significativo al cual se enfrenta el operador jurídico por fuera de las aulas universitarias.

Author: Carlos Arturo Gómez Pavajeau
Publisher: Universidad Externado
ISBN: 9587727258
Category : Law
Languages : es
Pages : 282

View

Book Description
La prueba de la culpabilidad, por supuesto también la de su exclusión, es el reto más alto que tienen los investigadores, fiscales y jueces penales ante sus deberes oficiales, como también la defensa, el representante de la víctima y el Ministerio Público para lo que les compete en el ejercicio de su rol. En las anteriores ediciones hemos venido proponiendo que la mejor manera de superar tan importante escollo es tratar de estudiar y enarbolar una constelación de indicadores de cada uno de los componentes de la culpabilidad, catálogo abierto y flexible, dispuesto a la práctica. En otras palabras, desarrollar una dogmática de la prueba en su dinamismo real y para la praxis judicial, lo que entedemos coincide con lo que en otras latitudes se ha dado en llamar probática jurídica.

Author: James R. May
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1107022258
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 427

View

Book Description
Reflecting a global trend, scores of countries have affirmed that their citizens are entitled to healthy air, water, and land and that their constitution should guarantee certain environmental rights. This book examines the increasing recognition that the environment is a proper subject for protection in constitutional texts and for vindication by constitutional courts. This phenomenon, which the authors call environmental constitutionalism, represents the confluence of constitutional law, international law, human rights, and environmental law. National apex and constitutional courts are exhibiting a growing interest in environmental rights, and as courts become more aware of what their peers are doing, this momentum is likely to increase. This book explains why such provisions came into being, how they are expressed, and the extent to which they have been, and might be, enforced judicially. It is a singular resource for evaluating the content of and hope for constitutional environmental rights.

Author: State of State of Illinois
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 114

View

Book Description
Illinois 2021 Rules of the Road handbook, drive safe!

Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Crime analysis
Languages : en
Pages : 548

View

Book Description

Author: Nathan Nobis
Publisher: Open Philosophy Press
ISBN: 0578532638
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 77

View

Book Description
This book introduces readers to the many arguments and controversies concerning abortion. While it argues for ethical and legal positions on the issues, it focuses on how to think about the issues, not just what to think about them. It is an ideal resource to improve your understanding of what people think, why they think that and whether their (and your) arguments are good or bad, and why. It's ideal for classroom use, discussion groups, organizational learning, and personal reading. From the Preface To many people, abortion is an issue for which discussions and debates are frustrating and fruitless: it seems like no progress will ever be made towards any understanding, much less resolution or even compromise. Judgments like these, however, are premature because some basic techniques from critical thinking, such as carefully defining words and testing definitions, stating the full structure of arguments so each step of the reasoning can be examined, and comparing the strengths and weaknesses of different explanations can help us make progress towards these goals. When emotions run high, we sometimes need to step back and use a passion for calm, cool, critical thinking. This helps us better understand the positions and arguments of people who see things differently from us, as well as our own positions and arguments. And we can use critical thinking skills help to try to figure out which positions are best, in terms of being supported by good arguments: after all, we might have much to learn from other people, sometimes that our own views should change, for the better. Here we use basic critical thinking skills to argue that abortion is typically not morally wrong. We begin with less morally-controversial claims: adults, children and babies are wrong to kill and wrong to kill, fundamentally, because they, we, are conscious, aware and have feelings. We argue that since early fetuses entirely lack these characteristics, they are not inherently wrong to kill and so most abortions are not morally wrong, since most abortions are done early in pregnancy, before consciousness and feeling develop in the fetus. Furthermore, since the right to life is not the right to someone else’s body, fetuses might not have the right to the pregnant woman’s body—which she has the right to—and so she has the right to not allow the fetus use of her body. This further justifies abortion, at least until technology allows for the removal of fetuses to other wombs. Since morally permissible actions should be legal, abortions should be legal: it is an injustice to criminalize actions that are not wrong. In the course of arguing for these claims, we: 1. discuss how to best define abortion; 2. dismiss many common “question-begging” arguments that merely assume their conclusions, instead of giving genuine reasons for them; 3. refute some often-heard “everyday arguments” about abortion, on all sides; 4. explain why the most influential philosophical arguments against abortion are unsuccessful; 5. provide some positive arguments that at least early abortions are not wrong; 6. briefly discuss the ethics and legality of later abortions, and more. This essay is not a “how to win an argument” piece or a tract or any kind of apologetics. It is not designed to help anyone “win” debates: everybody “wins” on this issue when we calmly and respectfully engage arguments with care, charity, honesty and humility. This book is merely a reasoned, systematic introduction to the issues that we hope models these skills and virtues. Its discussion should not be taken as absolute “proof” of anything: much more needs to be understood and carefully discussed—always.

Author: Guillermo Floris Margadant S.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 408

View

Book Description

Author: Claire Solomon
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780814212479
Category : Literary Criticism
Languages : en
Pages : 0

View

Book Description
Placing the prostitute at the center of reading, Fictions of Bad Life moves between text and meta-text, exploring how to rescue the prostitute from her imprisonment and turn her into the subject of history.

Author: Centre for Social Development and Humanitarian Affairs (United Nations)
Publisher: New York : United Nations
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 292

View

Book Description
Part Two. HUMAN RIGHTS

Author: Francis T. Cullen
Publisher: Createspace Independent Pub
ISBN: 9781478262503
Category : Social Science
Languages : en
Pages : 68

View

Book Description
A theme that has persisted throughout the history of American corrections is that efforts should be made to reform offenders. In particular, at the beginning of the 1900s, the rehabilitative ideal was enthusiastically trumpeted and helped to direct the renovation of the correctional system (e.g., implementation of indeterminate sentencing, parole, probation, a separate juvenile justice system). For the next seven decades, offender treatment reigned as the dominant correctional philosophy. Then, in the early 1970s, rehabilitation suffered a precipitous reversal of fortune. The larger disruptions in American society in this era prompted a general critique of the “state run” criminal justice system. Rehabilitation was blamed by liberals for allowing the state to act coercively against offenders, and was blamed by conservatives for allowing the state to act leniently toward offenders. In this context, the death knell of rehabilitation was seemingly sounded by Robert Martinson's (1974b) influential “nothing works” essay, which reported that few treatment programs reduced recidivism. This review of evaluation studies gave legitimacy to the antitreatment sentiments of the day; it ostensibly “proved” what everyone “already knew”: Rehabilitation did not work. In the subsequent quarter century, a growing revisionist movement has questioned Martinson's portrayal of the empirical status of the effectiveness of treatment interventions. Through painstaking literature reviews, these revisionist scholars have shown that many correctional treatment programs are effective in decreasing recidivism. More recently, they have undertaken more sophisticated quantitative syntheses of an increasing body of evaluation studies through a technique called “meta-analysis.” These meta-analyses reveal that across evaluation studies, the recidivism rate is, on average, 10 percentage points lower for the treatment group than for the control group. However, this research has also suggested that some correctional interventions have no effect on offender criminality (e.g., punishment-oriented programs), while others achieve substantial reductions in recidivism (i.e., approximately 25 percent). This variation in program success has led to a search for those “principles” that distinguish effective treatment interventions from ineffective ones. There is theoretical and empirical support for the conclusion that the rehabilitation programs that achieve the greatest reductions in recidivism use cognitive-behavioral treatments, target known predictors of crime for change, and intervene mainly with high-risk offenders. “Multisystemic treatment” is a concrete example of an effective program that largely conforms to these principles. In the time ahead, it would appear prudent that correctional policy and practice be “evidence based.” Knowledgeable about the extant research, policymakers would embrace the view that rehabilitation programs, informed by the principles of effective intervention, can “work” to reduce recidivism and thus can help foster public safety. By reaffirming rehabilitation, they would also be pursuing a policy that is consistent with public opinion research showing that Americans continue to believe that offender treatment should be an integral goal of the correctional system.