LA PRUEBA "JURÍDICA " DE LA CULPABILIDAD EN EL NUEVO SISTEMA PENAL - 4TA. EDICIÓN PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download LA PRUEBA "JURÍDICA " DE LA CULPABILIDAD EN EL NUEVO SISTEMA PENAL - 4TA. EDICIÓN PDF full book. Access full book title LA PRUEBA "JURÍDICA " DE LA CULPABILIDAD EN EL NUEVO SISTEMA PENAL - 4TA. EDICIÓN by Carlos Arturo Gómez Pavajeau. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Carlos Arturo Gómez Pavajeau Publisher: U. Externado de Colombia ISBN: 9587727258 Category : Law Languages : es Pages : 16
Book Description
La prueba de la culpabilidad, por supuesto también la de su exclusión, es el reto más alto que tienen los investigadores, fiscales y jueces penales ante sus deberes oficiales, como también la defensa, el representante de la víctima y el Ministerio Público para lo que les compete en el ejercicio de su rol. En las anteriores ediciones hemos venido proponiendo que la mejor manera de superar tan importante escollo es tratar de estudiar y enarbolar una constelación de indicadores de cada uno de los componentes de la culpabilidad, catálogo abierto y flexible, dispuesto a la práctica. En otras palabras, desarrollar una dogmática de la prueba en su dinamismo real y para la praxis judicial, lo que entedemos coincide con lo que en otras latitudes se ha dado en llamar probática jurídica.
Author: Carlos Arturo Gómez Pavajeau Publisher: U. Externado de Colombia ISBN: 9587727258 Category : Law Languages : es Pages : 16
Book Description
La prueba de la culpabilidad, por supuesto también la de su exclusión, es el reto más alto que tienen los investigadores, fiscales y jueces penales ante sus deberes oficiales, como también la defensa, el representante de la víctima y el Ministerio Público para lo que les compete en el ejercicio de su rol. En las anteriores ediciones hemos venido proponiendo que la mejor manera de superar tan importante escollo es tratar de estudiar y enarbolar una constelación de indicadores de cada uno de los componentes de la culpabilidad, catálogo abierto y flexible, dispuesto a la práctica. En otras palabras, desarrollar una dogmática de la prueba en su dinamismo real y para la praxis judicial, lo que entedemos coincide con lo que en otras latitudes se ha dado en llamar probática jurídica.
Author: Enrique Peñaranda Ramos Publisher: Universidad Externado ISBN: 9586163881 Category : Law Languages : es Pages : 118
Book Description
Presentar en toda esta rica complejidad el pensamiento de Günther Jakobs, más allá de las frecuentes simplificaciones de que ha sido objeto, ha sido el propósito de esta obra.Su origen se encuentra en el estudio preliminar con que se acompañó recientemente la traducción al idioma español de los estudios dogmáticos fundamentales de Jakobs. La oportunidad de su publicación separada quizá sea ahora aun mayor, una vez que ha visto la luz en nuestro idioma casi toda su obra jurídico penal.
Author: Nathan Nobis Publisher: Open Philosophy Press ISBN: 0578532638 Category : Philosophy Languages : en Pages : 77
Book Description
This book introduces readers to the many arguments and controversies concerning abortion. While it argues for ethical and legal positions on the issues, it focuses on how to think about the issues, not just what to think about them. It is an ideal resource to improve your understanding of what people think, why they think that and whether their (and your) arguments are good or bad, and why. It's ideal for classroom use, discussion groups, organizational learning, and personal reading. From the Preface To many people, abortion is an issue for which discussions and debates are frustrating and fruitless: it seems like no progress will ever be made towards any understanding, much less resolution or even compromise. Judgments like these, however, are premature because some basic techniques from critical thinking, such as carefully defining words and testing definitions, stating the full structure of arguments so each step of the reasoning can be examined, and comparing the strengths and weaknesses of different explanations can help us make progress towards these goals. When emotions run high, we sometimes need to step back and use a passion for calm, cool, critical thinking. This helps us better understand the positions and arguments of people who see things differently from us, as well as our own positions and arguments. And we can use critical thinking skills help to try to figure out which positions are best, in terms of being supported by good arguments: after all, we might have much to learn from other people, sometimes that our own views should change, for the better. Here we use basic critical thinking skills to argue that abortion is typically not morally wrong. We begin with less morally-controversial claims: adults, children and babies are wrong to kill and wrong to kill, fundamentally, because they, we, are conscious, aware and have feelings. We argue that since early fetuses entirely lack these characteristics, they are not inherently wrong to kill and so most abortions are not morally wrong, since most abortions are done early in pregnancy, before consciousness and feeling develop in the fetus. Furthermore, since the right to life is not the right to someone else’s body, fetuses might not have the right to the pregnant woman’s body—which she has the right to—and so she has the right to not allow the fetus use of her body. This further justifies abortion, at least until technology allows for the removal of fetuses to other wombs. Since morally permissible actions should be legal, abortions should be legal: it is an injustice to criminalize actions that are not wrong. In the course of arguing for these claims, we: 1. discuss how to best define abortion; 2. dismiss many common “question-begging” arguments that merely assume their conclusions, instead of giving genuine reasons for them; 3. refute some often-heard “everyday arguments” about abortion, on all sides; 4. explain why the most influential philosophical arguments against abortion are unsuccessful; 5. provide some positive arguments that at least early abortions are not wrong; 6. briefly discuss the ethics and legality of later abortions, and more. This essay is not a “how to win an argument” piece or a tract or any kind of apologetics. It is not designed to help anyone “win” debates: everybody “wins” on this issue when we calmly and respectfully engage arguments with care, charity, honesty and humility. This book is merely a reasoned, systematic introduction to the issues that we hope models these skills and virtues. Its discussion should not be taken as absolute “proof” of anything: much more needs to be understood and carefully discussed—always.
Author: Octavio Rodriguez Ferreira Publisher: ISBN: 9780996066341 Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
This report examines Mexico's progress toward implementation of the country's "new" criminal justice system, which introduces the use of oral, adversarial proceedings and other measures to improve the handling of criminal cases in terms of efficiency, transparency, and fairness to the parties involved. The report provides a general background on the 2008 judicial reform initiative, and examines Mexican government efforts to implement the reforms at the federal, state, and judicial district level, relying on a unique dataset and maps generated by the Justice in Mexico program based at the University of San Diego. As an additional resource, this report also contains a translation of the 2008 constitutional changes underlying the reforms
Author: Carlos Arturo Gómez Pavajeau
Author: Carlos Arturo Gómez Pavajeau
Author: Carlos Arturo Gómez Pavajeau
Author: Carlos Arturo Gómez Pavajeau
Author: Enrique Peñaranda Ramos
Author: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
Author: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
Author: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
Author: Nathan Nobis
Author: Octavio Rodriguez Ferreira
Author: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights