Author: United States. Supreme Court
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
District of Columbia Court of Appeals Et Al. V. Feldman Et Al
Author: United States. Supreme Court
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
The Rooker-Feldman Doctrine
Author: LandMark Publications
Publisher: Independently Published
ISBN: 9781094658414
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 552
Book Description
THIS CASEBOOK contains a selection of U. S. Court of Appeals decisions that analyze, interpret and apply the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. * * * Rooker-Feldman's jurisdictional bar protects the Supreme Court's certiorari jurisdiction under Section 1257 of Title 28 of the United States Code. It ensures that the United States Supreme Court is the only federal court to hear appeals from judgments rendered by the highest court of a state (or, as here, the District of Columbia). See D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 476, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fidelity Tr. Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923); see also Gray v. Poole, 275 F.3d 1113, 1119 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Operationally, the Rooker-Feldman doctrine "is confined to cases of the kind from which the doctrine acquired its name: cases brought by [i] state-court losers [ii] complaining of injuries caused by state-court judgments rendered before the [federal] district court proceedings commenced and [iii] inviting district court review and rejection of those judgments." Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus., 544 U.S. 280, 284, 125 S.Ct. 1517, 161 L.Ed.2d 454 (2005). The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that the doctrine is "narrow," applicable to bar only complaints that meet those listed conditions. Id.; see Skinner v. Switzer, 562 U.S. 521, 531, 131 S.Ct. 1289, 179 L.Ed.2d 233 (2011); Lance v. Dennis, 546 U.S. 459, 464, 126 S.Ct. 1198, 163 L.Ed.2d 1059 (2006); see also Singletary v. D.C., 766 F.3d 66, 71 (D.C. Cir. 2014). Indeed, the only two cases in which the Supreme Court has ever applied the doctrine to dismiss an action are the Rooker and Feldman namesake cases themselves. See Exxon Mobil Corp., 544 U.S. at 283, 125 S.Ct. 1517. Croley v. Joint Committee on Judicial Admin., 895 F. 3d 22 (DC Cir. 2018)
Publisher: Independently Published
ISBN: 9781094658414
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 552
Book Description
THIS CASEBOOK contains a selection of U. S. Court of Appeals decisions that analyze, interpret and apply the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. * * * Rooker-Feldman's jurisdictional bar protects the Supreme Court's certiorari jurisdiction under Section 1257 of Title 28 of the United States Code. It ensures that the United States Supreme Court is the only federal court to hear appeals from judgments rendered by the highest court of a state (or, as here, the District of Columbia). See D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 476, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fidelity Tr. Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923); see also Gray v. Poole, 275 F.3d 1113, 1119 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Operationally, the Rooker-Feldman doctrine "is confined to cases of the kind from which the doctrine acquired its name: cases brought by [i] state-court losers [ii] complaining of injuries caused by state-court judgments rendered before the [federal] district court proceedings commenced and [iii] inviting district court review and rejection of those judgments." Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus., 544 U.S. 280, 284, 125 S.Ct. 1517, 161 L.Ed.2d 454 (2005). The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that the doctrine is "narrow," applicable to bar only complaints that meet those listed conditions. Id.; see Skinner v. Switzer, 562 U.S. 521, 531, 131 S.Ct. 1289, 179 L.Ed.2d 233 (2011); Lance v. Dennis, 546 U.S. 459, 464, 126 S.Ct. 1198, 163 L.Ed.2d 1059 (2006); see also Singletary v. D.C., 766 F.3d 66, 71 (D.C. Cir. 2014). Indeed, the only two cases in which the Supreme Court has ever applied the doctrine to dismiss an action are the Rooker and Feldman namesake cases themselves. See Exxon Mobil Corp., 544 U.S. at 283, 125 S.Ct. 1517. Croley v. Joint Committee on Judicial Admin., 895 F. 3d 22 (DC Cir. 2018)
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Trumpeter Swan Society, Et Al. Appellants, V. Environmental Protection Agency, Et Al. Appellees
Author: William J. Snape (III)
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bullets
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Petitioner seeks rehearing on the basis that the District Court misapprehended facts concerning cartridges, shells, bullets, and shots in determining the application of the Toxic Substances Control Act.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bullets
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Petitioner seeks rehearing on the basis that the District Court misapprehended facts concerning cartridges, shells, bullets, and shots in determining the application of the Toxic Substances Control Act.
Revised Rules for the Government and Practice of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia
Author: District of Columbia. Court of Appeals
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Appellate procedure
Languages : en
Pages : 80
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Appellate procedure
Languages : en
Pages : 80
Book Description
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Revised Rules for the Government and Practice of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia
Author: District of Columbia. Court of Appeals
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Appellate procedure
Languages : en
Pages : 76
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Appellate procedure
Languages : en
Pages : 76
Book Description
Swidler & Berlin Et Al. V. United States
Author: United States. Supreme Court
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Author: United States. Court of Appeals (District of Columbia Circuit)
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law reports, digests, etc
Languages : en
Pages : 568
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law reports, digests, etc
Languages : en
Pages : 568
Book Description
Reports of Cases Adjudged in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Author: United States. Court of Appeals (District of Columbia Circuit)
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law reports, digests, etc
Languages : en
Pages : 504
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law reports, digests, etc
Languages : en
Pages : 504
Book Description
Whren Et Al. V. United States
Author: United States. Supreme Court
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description