Design of Roadside Barrier Systems Placed on Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Retaining Walls PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Design of Roadside Barrier Systems Placed on Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Retaining Walls PDF full book. Access full book title Design of Roadside Barrier Systems Placed on Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Retaining Walls by Kang Mi Kim. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Kang Mi Kim Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
Millions of square feet of mechanically stabilized earth retaining wall are constructed annually in the United States. When used in highway fill applications in conjunction with bridges, these MSE walls are typically constructed with a roadside barrier system supported on the edge of the wall. This barrier system generally consists of a traffic barrier or bridge rail placed on a continuous footing or structural slab. The footing is intended to reduce the influence of barrier impact loads on the retaining wall system by distributing the load over a wide area and to provide stability for the barrier against sliding or overturning. The proper design of the roadside barrier, the structural slab, and the MSE wall system requires a good understanding of relevant failure modes, how barrier impact loads are transferred into the wall system, and the magnitude and distribution of these loads. In this study, a procedure is developed that provides guidance for designing: 1. the barrier-moment slab, 2. the wall reinforcement, and 3. the wall panels. These design guidelines are developed in terms of AASHTO LRFD procedures. The research approach consisted of engineering analyses, finite element analyses, static load tests, full-scale dynamic impact tests, and a full-scale vehicle crash test. It was concluded that a 44.5 kN (10 kips) equivalent static load is appropriate for the stability design of the barrier-moment slab system. This will result in much more economical design than systems developed using the 240 kN (54 kips) load that some user agencies are using. Design loads for the wall reinforcement and wall panels are also presented.
Author: Kang Mi Kim Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
Millions of square feet of mechanically stabilized earth retaining wall are constructed annually in the United States. When used in highway fill applications in conjunction with bridges, these MSE walls are typically constructed with a roadside barrier system supported on the edge of the wall. This barrier system generally consists of a traffic barrier or bridge rail placed on a continuous footing or structural slab. The footing is intended to reduce the influence of barrier impact loads on the retaining wall system by distributing the load over a wide area and to provide stability for the barrier against sliding or overturning. The proper design of the roadside barrier, the structural slab, and the MSE wall system requires a good understanding of relevant failure modes, how barrier impact loads are transferred into the wall system, and the magnitude and distribution of these loads. In this study, a procedure is developed that provides guidance for designing: 1. the barrier-moment slab, 2. the wall reinforcement, and 3. the wall panels. These design guidelines are developed in terms of AASHTO LRFD procedures. The research approach consisted of engineering analyses, finite element analyses, static load tests, full-scale dynamic impact tests, and a full-scale vehicle crash test. It was concluded that a 44.5 kN (10 kips) equivalent static load is appropriate for the stability design of the barrier-moment slab system. This will result in much more economical design than systems developed using the 240 kN (54 kips) load that some user agencies are using. Design loads for the wall reinforcement and wall panels are also presented.
Author: Roger P. Bligh Publisher: Transportation Research Board ISBN: 0309154995 Category : Technology & Engineering Languages : en Pages : 195
Book Description
TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 663: Design of Roadside Barrier Systems Placed on MSE Retaining Walls explores a design procedure for roadside barrier systems mounted on the edge of a mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) wall. The procedures were developed following American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Load and Resistant Factor Design (LRFD) practices. Appendices A through H to NCHRP Report 663 are available online. Titles of Appendices A through H are as follows: Appendix A: Design of MSE Wall; Appendix B: State-of-Practice Survey; Appendix C: Detailed Drawing of MSE Wall for Bogie Test; Appendix D: Bogie Test MSE Wall Construction Procedure; Appendix E: Detailed Drawing of MSE Wall for TL-3 Test; Appendix F: TL-3 MSE Wall Construction Procedure; Appendix G: Crash Test Vehicle Properties and Information; Appendix H: Crash Test Sequential Photographs--
Author: Publisher: ISBN: Category : Retaining walls Languages : en Pages : 373
Book Description
A major use of Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) walls is as bridge approach embankments, where they are typically constructed with a roadside barrier system supported on the edge of the walls. The TRB National Cooperative Highway Research Program's NCHRP Web-Only Document 326: Design Guidelines for Test Level 3 through Test Level 5 Roadside Barrier Systems Placed on Mechanically Stabilized Earth Retaining Walls is dedicated to developing guidelines for barrier-moment slab systems placed over MSE walls to resist vehicular impact loads resulting from three test levels. Supplementary to the document is a Presentation.
Author: Deeyvid Oscar Saez Barrios Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
The use of Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) wall structures has increased dramatically in recent years. Traffic barriers are frequently placed on top of the MSE wall to resist vehicular impact loads. The barrier systems are anchored to the concrete in case of rigid pavement. Nevertheless, in case of flexible pavement, the barriers are constructed in an L shape so that the impact load on the vertical part of the L can be resisted by the inertia force required to uplift the horizontal part of the L. The barrier must be designed to resist the full dynamic load but the size of the horizontal part of the L (moment slab) is determined using an equivalent static load. Current design practice of barriers mounted on top of MSE retaining wall is well defined for passenger cars and light trucks. However, the information of this impact level is extrapolated to heavy vehicle impact. Therefore, the bases of this research is to develop design procedure and to help understand the dynamic behavior of a barrier-moment slab system on top of an MSE wall when subjected to heavy vehicle impact loads. In a first part, numerical analyses were conducted to better understand the behavior of the barrier-moment slab system when subjected to heavy vehicle impact loads. The full-scale impact simulations were used to develop the recommendation for designing and sizing the barrier-moment slab system. In a second part, the barrier-moment slab systems defined to contain heavy vehicle impact loads were placed on top of an MSE wall model to study the kinematic behavior of the system. Loads in the soil reinforcing strips and displacements on the barriers and wall components are evaluated to define recommendation for design of strip reinforcements against pullout and yielding. In a third part, a full-scale crash test on a barrier-moment slab system on top of an instrumented 9.8 ft. (3 m) high MSE wall is described and analyzed. The MSE wall and barrier system were adequate to contain and redirected the vehicle and, therefore, it served as verification of the proposed recommendation. Finally, conclusions are drawn on the basis of the information presented herein. The electronic version of this dissertation is accessible from http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/148253
Author: Kimberly Finke Morrison Publisher: ISBN: Category : Retaining walls Languages : en Pages : 232
Book Description
As a Federal Highway Administration design reference for highway projects, this report was prepared to enable the engineer to identify and evaluate potential applications of shored mechanically stabilized earth (SMSE) walls. Included in this design guideline are a literature review on similar construction and the results and interpretation of field-scale testing, centrifuge modeling, and numerical modeling of an SMSE wall system. Results of the centrifuge modeling and field-scale testing show that reduction of the reinforcement length to as little as 25 percent of the wall height (0.25H) provides sufficient wall stability, even under a considerably high degree of surcharge loading. Using the results of the modeling and field testing research, this design guideline recommends a minimum reinforcement length equivalent to as little as 30 percent of the wall height (0.3H) for the MSE wall component, provided that the MSE reinforcement length is greater than 1.5 m. The benefit of attaching reinforcement to the shoring wall is found to be small and is generally not recommended except by way of the upper two layers of reinforcement. If possible, these layers of reinforcement should overlap the shoring wall and have a total length of 0.6H. If this is not possible, then these layers should be attached to the shoring wall. Internal design requirements of the MSE wall component for an SMSE wall system differ from that of a traditional MSE wall. Equations presented in this design guideline have been developed specifically to address these requirements. The benefits of increased retaining abilities provided by the shoring wall, such as reduction in lateral load acting on the MSE wall component and contribution to global stability, are considered in the design process.
Author: Vishal Sambaiah Dantal Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 243
Book Description
Since its appearance in 1970s, mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls have become a majority among all types of retaining walls due to their economics and satisfactory performance. The Texas Department of Transportation has primarily adopted the Federal Highway Administration and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) guidelines for design of MSE walls. The research addresses three main issues expressed by TxDOT in their design and material selection process. The literature review in this research addresses the current practice and guidelines adopted by TxDOT as well as other Department of Transportations. The first part of this dissertation explains the laboratory test performed on backfill materials used in Texas. The material classification was carried out according to TxDOT specifications and the laboratory test consist of performing state-of-the-art large scale triaxial test on large particles to evaluate engineering properties of backfill materials and a consolidated undrained test on a backfill material with higher amount fine particles present in that soil. The second part of this addresses the issues on global stability and failure modes associated with it. A Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua (FLAC) program was used to asseses possible failure modes for MSE walls with different geometries and soil parameters for retained and foundation soils. Finally, a parametric study was performed for sliding analysis using AASTHO recommended design parameters and comparing them with modified design parameters calculated from FLAC simulations for different geometries and soil parameters. Similarly, a parametric study was performed to address bearing capacity issues for MSE walls and justification of AASHTO recommendation with German code (EBGEO) for MSE walls. The outcome this research shows that, the friction angle (Ø) for the backfill materials used in Texas is higher than AASHTO recommended values for large particles size type backfills. From FLAC simulations it shows that the global failure mechanism for MSE walls is dependent on type of soil properties used as retained and foundation soils. The parametric study shows that a modified parameters can be used for sliding analysis and for bearing capacity analysis a combination of Vesic's and German code can be used. The electronic version of this dissertation is accessible from http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/151797
Author: Highway Innovative Technology Evaluation Center (U.S.) Publisher: ASCE Publications ISBN: 9780784474716 Category : Technology & Engineering Languages : en Pages : 152
Book Description
Prepared by the Highway Innovative Technology Evaluation Center (HITEC), a CERF service center. This report describes a HITEC evaluation designed to determine the basic capabilities and limitations of the MSE Plus System, manufactured by SSL, LLC, for use as a mechanically stabilized earth retaining system. The evaluation was conducted based on material, design, construction, performance, and quality assurance information outlined in the HITEC Protocol. TheØMSE PlusØSystem features rectangular segmental precast concrete facing panels and galanized welded wire, grid-type soil reinforcement.
Author: Christopher L. Raeburn Publisher: ISBN: Category : Oregon Languages : en Pages : 42
Book Description
Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) retaining walls have become the dominant retained wall system on ODOT projects. The permanent MSE walls constructed on ODOT projects, in recent years, use metallic reinforcements and facing connections buried directly in the backfill soil. Accelerated deterioration of these structural elements would have serious financial and safety impacts for the Department. Classical MSE wall design incorporates an estimate of deterioration of reinforcement by corrosion. Monitoring of actual corrosion performance, however, is an important element of managing the current inventory of MSE walls. Monitoring could answer key questions that can provide for the best management of the existing walls, and provide feedback to the design process for future installations. This report details a literature review of methods for estimating and measuring deterioration of structural reinforcing elements in both concrete and MSE walls. It also presents a selected history of metallic reinforcement design specification and utilization. A listing of the MSE walls that can be identified in the ODOT Bridge Data System is included.
Author: Swami Saran Publisher: I K International Pvt Ltd ISBN: 938590972X Category : Technology & Engineering Languages : en Pages : 435
Book Description
Reinforced soil is a composite material formed by the association of frictional soil and tension-resistant elements in the form of sheets, strips, nets or mats of metal, synthetic fabrics, or fibre reinforced plastics and arranged in the soil mass in such a way as to reduce or suppress the tensile strain that might develop under gravity and boundary forces. The variety and range of applications of reinforced soil technique are unlimited. Jones (1985) identified several field applications, viz., retaining walls, abutments, quay walls, embankments, dams, hill roads, housing, foundations, railways, industry, pipe works, waterway structures and underground structures. In several countries structures have been constructed using this technique and the concept has become very popular. The book covers all the important topics like Basic Mechanism, Strength Characteristics, Frictional Characteristics, Reinforced Soil, Wall, Wall with Reinforced Backfill, Foundation on Reinforced Soil, Soil Nailing and Randomly Distributed soil. Each chapter is supported by illustrative examples for easy understanding. In this edition, chapters on Reinforced Soil Wall, Foundation on Reinforced Soil, and Randomly distributed reinforced soil have been substantially modified making the book more useful. The book would well serve and benefit undergraduate and postgraduate students, researchers and professional geotechnical engineers.
Author: Kang Mi Kim
Author: Kang Mi Kim
Author: Roger P. Bligh
Author: 
Author: Deeyvid Oscar Saez Barrios
Author: Kimberly Finke Morrison
Author: Vishal Sambaiah Dantal
Author: Highway Innovative Technology Evaluation Center (U.S.)
Author: Christopher L. Raeburn
Author: Swami Saran
Author: Charles Aubeny