H.R. 3822, to strengthen the system of Congressional oversight of intelligence activities of the United States PDF Download

Author: United States. Congress. House. Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Subcommittee on Legislation
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Executive power
Languages : en
Pages : 364

View

Book Description

Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 176

View

Book Description
Distributed to some depository libraries in microfiche.

Author: United States. Congress. House. Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Internal security
Languages : en
Pages : 200

View

Book Description

Author: United States. Congress
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
ISBN: 9781983884429
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 64

View

Book Description
Congressional oversight of intelligence activities : hearing before the Select Committee on Intelligence of the United States Senate, One Hundred Tenth Congress, first session, November 13, 2007.

Author: Frederick M. Kaiser
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 143793286X
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 30

View

Book Description
Contents: (1) Intro.; (2) House and Senate Select Committees on Intelligence; (3) Joint Committee on Atomic Energy as a Model; (4) Proposed Joint Committee on Intelligence Characteristics: Methods of Establishment; Jurisdiction and Authority; Membership; Terms and Rotation; Leadership; Secrecy Controls; Pros and Cons; (5) Alternatives to a Joint Committee: Changing the Select Committees¿ Structure and Powers; Concerns about Restructuring the Intelligence Committees; Constraints on Coordination; Increasing the Use of Congressional Support Agencies; (6) Observations on Oversight of Intelligence: Obstacles to Oversight: Secrecy Constraints. This is a print on demand edition of an important, hard-to-find publication.

Author: Congressional Research Service
Publisher: Independently Published
ISBN: 9781793036230
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 24

View

Book Description
Prior to the establishment of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) in 1976 and 1977, respectively, Congress did not take much interest in conducting oversight of the intelligence community (IC). The Subcommittees on the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of the congressional Armed Services Committees had nominal oversight responsibility, though Congress generally trusted that IC could more or less regulate itself and conduct activities that complied with the law, were ethical, and shared a common understanding of national security priorities. Media reports in the 1970s of the CIA﷿s domestic surveillance of Americans opposed to the war in Vietnam, in addition to the agency﷿s activities relating to national elections in Chile, prompted Congress to change its approach. In 1975, Congress established two select committees to investigate intelligence activities, chaired by Senator Frank Church in the Senate (the ﷿Church Committee﷿), and Representative Otis Pike in the House (the ﷿Pike Committee﷿). Following their creation, the Church and Pike committees﷿ hearings revealed the possible extent of the abuse of authority by the IC and the potential need for permanent committee oversight focused solely on the IC and intelligence activities. SSCI and HPSCI oversight contributed substantially to Congress' work to legislate improvements to intelligence organization, programs, and processes, and it enabled a more structured, routine relationship with intelligence agencies. On occasion, this has resulted in Congress advocating on behalf of intelligence reform legislation that many agree has generally improved IC organization and performance. At other times, congressional oversight has been perceived as less helpful, delving into the details of programs and activities. Other congressional committees have cooperated with the HPSCI and SSCI in their oversight role since their establishment. Intelligence programs are often closely tied to foreign and defense policy, military operations, homeland security, cybersecurity, and law enforcement. Committees in both chambers for Foreign Affairs/Relations, Armed Services, Appropriations, Judiciary, and Homeland Security, therefore, share jurisdiction over intelligence. Some have suggested the current overlapping jurisdictions for oversight of the IC in Congress contribute to the perception of weak congressional intelligence committees that have relatively little authority and insufficient expertise. Others cite the overlapping responsibilities as a strength. Oversight of the IC spread over more committees can contribute to greater awareness and transparency in Congress of classified intelligence activities that are largely hidden from public view. They also claim that since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, Senate and House rules have changed to enable the congressional intelligence committees to have more authority and be more effective in carrying out their oversight responsibilities. Further reform, they argue, may be unrealistic from a political standpoint. An oft-cited observation of the Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States (i.e., the 9-11 Commission) that congressional oversight of intelligence is ﷿dysfunctional﷿ continues to overshadow discussion of whether Congress has done enough. Does congressional oversight enable the IC to be more effective, better funded, and better organized, or does it burden agencies by the sheer volume of detailed inquiries into intelligence programs and related activities? A central question for Congress is as follows: Could additional changes to the rules governing congressional oversight of intelligence enable Congress to more effectively fund programs, influence policy, and legislate improvements in intelligence standards, organization, and process that would make the country safer?

Author: Amy B. Zegart
Publisher: Hoover Press
ISBN: 081791286X
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 119

View

Book Description
Amy Zegart examines the weaknesses of US intelligence oversight and why those deficiencies have persisted, despite the unprecedented importance of intelligence in today's environment. She argues that many of the biggest oversight problems lie with Congress—the institution, not the parties or personalities—showing how Congress has collectively and persistently tied its own hands in overseeing intelligence.

Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Government Operations
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Executive advisory bodies
Languages : en
Pages : 562

View

Book Description

Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780160831737
Category : Intelligence service
Languages : en
Pages : 59

View

Book Description

Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Government Operations. Subcommittee on Intergovernmental Relations
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Intelligence service
Languages : en
Pages : 212

View

Book Description