Bias Crime Response Task Force Final Report PDF Download

Author: Bias Crime Response Task Force (Mich.)
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Hate crimes
Languages : en
Pages : 120

View

Book Description

Author: New York (State). Governor's Task Force on Bias-Related Violence
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Aggressiveness
Languages : en
Pages : 384

View

Book Description

Author: New York (State). Governor's Task Force on Bias-Related Violence
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Civil rights
Languages : en
Pages : 384

View

Book Description

Author: United States. President's Task Force on Victims of Crime
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description

Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Criminal justice, Administration of
Languages : en
Pages : 228

View

Book Description

Author: California. Attorney General's Commission on Racial, Ethnic, Religious, and Minority Violence
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : California
Languages : en
Pages : 248

View

Book Description

Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Crime and Drugs
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Social Science
Languages : en
Pages : 246

View

Book Description

Author: James B. Jacobs
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0198032226
Category : Social Science
Languages : en
Pages : 223

View

Book Description
In the early 1980s, a new category of crime appeared in the criminal law lexicon. In response to concerted advocacy-group lobbying, Congress and many state legislatures passed a wave of "hate crime" laws requiring the collection of statistics on, and enhancing the punishment for, crimes motivated by certain prejudices. This book places the evolution of the hate crime concept in socio-legal perspective. James B. Jacobs and Kimberly Potter adopt a skeptical if not critical stance, maintaining that legal definitions of hate crime are riddled with ambiguity and subjectivity. No matter how hate crime is defined, and despite an apparent media consensus to the contrary, the authors find no evidence to support the claim that the United States is experiencing a hate crime epidemic--instead, they cast doubt on whether the number of hate crimes is even increasing. The authors further assert that, while the federal effort to establish a reliable hate crime accounting system has failed, data collected for this purpose have led to widespread misinterpretation of the state of intergroup relations in this country. The book contends that hate crime as a socio-legal category represents the elaboration of an identity politics now manifesting itself in many areas of the law. But the attempt to apply the anti-discrimination paradigm to criminal law generates problems and anomalies. For one thing, members of minority groups are frequently hate crime perpetrators. Moreover, the underlying conduct prohibited by hate crime law is already subject to criminal punishment. Jacobs and Potter question whether hate crimes are worse or more serious than similar crimes attributable to other anti-social motivations. They also argue that the effort to single out hate crime for greater punishment is, in effect, an effort to punish some offenders more seriously simply because of their beliefs, opinions, or values, thus implicating the First Amendment. Advancing a provocative argument in clear and persuasive terms, Jacobs and Potter show how the recriminalization of hate crime has little (if any) value with respect to law enforcement or criminal justice. Indeed, enforcement of such laws may exacerbate intergroup tensions rather than eradicate prejudice.

Author: Office of International Criminal Justice
Publisher: Office of International Criminal Justice
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 246

View

Book Description

Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on the Constitution
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Crime
Languages : en
Pages : 428

View

Book Description