Attorney General Opinion No. 1999-010 PDF Download

Author: Carla J. Stovall
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description
The provisions of 1999 Senate Bill No. 288 do not violate the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution or Section 11 of the Bill of Rights of the Kansas Constitution, nor do they violate the Equal Protection Clauses of the United States and Kansas Constitutions. Cited herein: 1999 Senate Bill No. 288; Kan. Const., Bill of Rights, sections 1, 2, 11; U.S. Const., Amend. 1, 14.

Author: Carla J. Stovall
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description
K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 68-406 authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to make changes to the State highway system when the changes are required for public safety, convenience, economy, classification or reclassification, but removal of a road from the State highway system involves a reclassification or revision that requires the Secretary to rely on an engineering and traffic study and conduct a public hearing. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 68-406.

Author: Carla J. Stovall
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description
A city may barricade a portion of a street without infringing upon certain property owners' rights of access if such property owners continue to have access to streets that abut their property.

Author: American Bar Association. House of Delegates
Publisher: American Bar Association
ISBN: 9781590318737
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 216

View

Book Description
The Model Rules of Professional Conduct provides an up-to-date resource for information on legal ethics. Federal, state and local courts in all jurisdictions look to the Rules for guidance in solving lawyer malpractice cases, disciplinary actions, disqualification issues, sanctions questions and much more. In this volume, black-letter Rules of Professional Conduct are followed by numbered Comments that explain each Rule's purpose and provide suggestions for its practical application. The Rules will help you identify proper conduct in a variety of given situations, review those instances where discretionary action is possible, and define the nature of the relationship between you and your clients, colleagues and the courts.

Author: Carla J. Stovall
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description
A law enforcement officer has no authority to stop a person and make inquiry concerning a possible violation of a regulation of a private homes association unless the officer suspects that such individual has violated or is about to violate a state law or a municipal ordinance. Cited herein: K.S.A. 22-2402; U.S. Const., Amend. XIV.

Author: Carla J. Stovall
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description
Documents related to an investigation conducted by an attorney for his or her client in order to provide legal advice to the client, may be closed under the Kansas Open Records Act because they are protected by the attorney-client privilege. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 45-217; K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 45-221; 60-226; K.S.A. 60-426.

Author: Carla J. Stovall
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description
Subsection (c) of K.S.A. 25-4323 states that no more than one less of a majority of a local governing body may be subject to recall at the same time. The number of members serving on a three-member board who may be subject to recall at the same time is one. A local officer is subject to recall once a petition seeking recall of the officer is properly filed. If a petition seeking recall of one member of a three-member governing body has been filed with the county election officer and the county election officer has determined the petition was properly filed, a petition seeking recall of a second member may not be approved by the county election officer until after the recall election on the first member has been conducted. While a petition seeking recall of a second member of a three-member governing body may not be approved until the recall election on the first member is conducted, the petition may still be circulated. Cited herein: K.S.A. 25-4301; 25-4302, as amended by L. 1999, Ch. 105, section 8; 25-4318; 25-4322, as amended by L. 1999, Ch. 105, section 9; 25-4323; 25-4324, as amended by L. 1999, Ch. 105, section 10; 25-4326; Kan. Const., Art. 4, section 3; L. 1987, Ch. 130, section 1; L. 1978, Ch. 147, sections 2, 6; L. 1976, Ch. 178, section 26.

Author: Carla J. Stovall
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description
The Hospital and Related Facilities Act, K.S.A. 19-4601 et seq., vests sole authority for determining the compensation for county hospital board members in the board of county commissioners. Therefore, a county hospital board is not authorized to make payments for health insurance and compensation to its members as determined by the hospital board. Any remedies available to a county commission to force reimbursement or cessation of unauthorized payments by a county hospital board depend on the specific facts surrounding the payments and should be determined by the commission in consultation with its legal counsel. Because a county hospital board is not subject to the cash-basis law, a county hospital board may extend the hospital administrator's contract for a period of three years without violating the cash-basis law. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 10-1101; K.S.A. 10-1112; 19-4601; 19-4609; 19-4610; 19-4611; 46-216; 75-4301.

Author: Carla J. Stovall
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description
Absent statutory authority, a court order assessing attorney fees in a child-in-need-of-care action is not a civil judgment that can be enforced by garnishment. Moreover, such order cannot be enforced as a civil judgment unless the Legislature so authorizes. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 22-4513; 38-1511; K.S.A. 38-1593; 60-714; 60-716.

Author: Carla J. Stovall
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description
Sheriffs are empowered by K.S.A. 19-805 to appoint deputies for particular purposes. Thus, sheriffs have statutory authority to deputize tribal law enforcement officers to enforce state law within the parameters set by the sheriff. Generally a sheriff is liable for official acts of the sheriff's deputies. However, tribes may agree to waive their immunity for purposes of indemnifying the county or sheriff for any liability incurred as a result of negligent acts of deputized tribal law enforcement officers while acting in an official capacity on behalf of the sheriff. The mechanism for enforcing such an agreement will depend on the terms of the agreement. Cited herein: K.S.A. 19-805; 19-805a; 74-2113; 74-5602; K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 74-9804(c); K.S.A. 75-711; 75-6101; 42 U.S.C. section 1983.