Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-114 PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-114 PDF full book. Access full book title Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-114 by Robert T. Stephan. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Robert T. Stephan Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
Kansas is one of 21 states that currently requires affirmation and price posting by all suppliers of liquor who sell their products to distributors (wholesalers) in the state. Price posting is a requirement that each supplier notify Alcoholic Beverage Control of the price to be charged for each item to be sold in the state. Affirmation is a sworn statement that the prices as posted are at the same level as the lowest prices offered to wholesalers in any other state. The statement also serves as an agreement not to discriminate among Kansas distributors in terms of prices or other services. On June 3, 1986, the United States Supreme Court held that New York's price affirmation laws were unconstitutional because they placed a substantial burden on interstate commerce. In that the price affirmation laws of Kansas and New York are virtually identical, it is our opinion that Kansas affirmation laws relating to pricing in any other state is unconstitutional. Furthermore, enforcement of this interstate affirmation should cease immediately. The Supreme Court's decision did not address intrastate affirmation or posting. It is our opinion that intrastate affirmation and intrastate posting should continue to be enforced. This will ensure that no discrimination among Kansas wholesalers will occur. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 41-1101; K.S.A. 41-1111; 41-1112; K.A.R. 14-4-7; K.A.R. 14-4-11 (1985).
Author: Robert T. Stephan Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
Kansas is one of 21 states that currently requires affirmation and price posting by all suppliers of liquor who sell their products to distributors (wholesalers) in the state. Price posting is a requirement that each supplier notify Alcoholic Beverage Control of the price to be charged for each item to be sold in the state. Affirmation is a sworn statement that the prices as posted are at the same level as the lowest prices offered to wholesalers in any other state. The statement also serves as an agreement not to discriminate among Kansas distributors in terms of prices or other services. On June 3, 1986, the United States Supreme Court held that New York's price affirmation laws were unconstitutional because they placed a substantial burden on interstate commerce. In that the price affirmation laws of Kansas and New York are virtually identical, it is our opinion that Kansas affirmation laws relating to pricing in any other state is unconstitutional. Furthermore, enforcement of this interstate affirmation should cease immediately. The Supreme Court's decision did not address intrastate affirmation or posting. It is our opinion that intrastate affirmation and intrastate posting should continue to be enforced. This will ensure that no discrimination among Kansas wholesalers will occur. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 41-1101; K.S.A. 41-1111; 41-1112; K.A.R. 14-4-7; K.A.R. 14-4-11 (1985).
Author: Robert T. Stephan Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
The change or amendment of a municipal zoning ordinance is a "project" within the meaning of K.S.A. 75-2716(c) and K.S.A. 1986 Supp. 75-2724. Accordingly, a city is required to give the state historic preservation officer notice and an opportunity to comment when such change or amendment is being considered. The term "environs," as used in the Kansas historic preservation act, may include property surrounding a designated historic site even though said properties are not adjoining. Cited herein: K.S.A. 75-2715; 75-2716; K.S.A. 1986 Supp. 75-2724; 77-201 s̲e̲c̲o̲n̲d̲.
Author: Robert T. Stephan Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
A search warrant maybe issued by a district magistrate judge upon the sworn oral or written statement of a city attorney. Municipal law enforcement officers may execute such warrant, and property seized pursuant to the warrant may be admissible as evidence in a municipal court. However, K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 8-1001(f) precludes the use of a search warrant to obtain a blood sample from a person who has refused to submit to a blood, breath or urine test pursuant to that statute. An ordinance authorizing such procedure would be in conflict with the state statute prohibiting further testing after an informed refusal. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 8-1001, as amended by L. 1986, ch. 40, section 2; K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 8-1005, as amended by L. 1986, ch. 41, section 1; K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 8-1567(m); K.S.A. 12-4504; K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 22-2202, as amended by L. 1986, ch. 133, section 1; K.S.A. 22-2502; 22-2503; 22-2507; L. 1986, ch. 40, section 1.
Author: Robert T. Stephan Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
K.S.A. 75-4319(b)(2) authorizes public bodies subject to the Kansas Open Meetings Act (KOMA) to recess into an executive session for the purpose of "consultation with an attorney for the body or agency which would be deemed privileged in the attorney-client relationship ..." The term "consultation" as used in the KOMA necessarily implies the presence of an attorney. Even though a letter from an attorney to his client containing advice is a privileged communication, we must conclude that members of a public body cannot recess into an executive session to review and discuss among themselves a letter from their attorney. Therefore, it is our opinion that the "consultation with an attorney" exception to the open meetings law cannot be invoked unless the attorney for the body is present. Cited herein: K.S.A. 60-426; 75-4317; K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 75-4318(a); K.S.A. 75-4319.
Author: Robert T. Stephan Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
A contest which requires a person to purchase a newspaper to obtain entry forms to participate constitutes a lottery and is illegal in Kansas. Cited herein: K.S.A. 21-4302.
Author: Robert T. Stephan Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
The Secretary of Administration has the authority to enter into an agreement with a non-profit corporation whereby that corporation, at its own expense, will plan and construct a Fountain of Justice, dependent upon the Secretary's approval, on state-owned property. The Secretary may further agree to maintain such fountain, provided the agreement complies with relevant budget laws. Cited herein: K.S.A. 75-1203; 75-1254, as amended by L. 1986, ch. 317, section 1; K.S.A. 75-2236; K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 75-3717; K.S.A. 75-3741; 75-3762; 75-3763; 75-3764.
Author: Robert T. Stephan Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
Any law enforcement officer may execute an arrest warrant within the officer's jurisdictions. Cited Herein: K.S.A. 19-812a; K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 22-2202, as amended by L. 1986, ch. 133, 150; K.S.A. 22-2305; K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 22-2401a.
Author: Robert T. Stephan Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
A state or national bank which receives a deposit of state moneys is required to secure the account by a pledge of securities. K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 75-4218. Direct obligations of the United States government or its agencies are qualified securities, as are obligations insured as to principal and interest by the United States government or one of its agencies. K.S.A. 75-4201(p)(1). Cited herein: K.S.A. 75-4201; K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 75-4218; K.S.A. 75-4221; 7 U.S.C. sections 1981; 1988; 12 U.S.C. sections 1435; 1455; 1717; 1719; 1721; 15 U.S.C. sections 633; 634; 16 U.S.C. sections 831n-1; 831n-3; 831n-4; 31 U.S.C. section 3123; 42 U.S.C. sections 3534; 4514.
Author: Robert T. Stephan Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
Based on the nominee's personal data form as submitted to the Supreme Court Nominating Commission, said nominee does not meet the qualification in K.S.A. 20-105 of having engaged in the active and continuous practice of law for a period of ten years prior to the date of appointment as justice. The active practice of law has been defined by the Supreme Court of Kansas as meaning that the legal activities of the individual must have been pursued on a full-time basis and constituted his regular business. The nominee is not automatically disqualified because of having held the positions to which he has been appointed, but because his personal data form does not indicate that his legal activities while holding those positions were "pursued on a full-time basis and constituted his regular business." In making the ultimate determination of whether this nominee is qualified, the Supreme Court Nominating Commission may consider additional information regarding specific legal services performed by the nominee in his various employments and may thus reach a contrary conclusion. Cited herein: K.S.A. 20-105.
Author: Robert T. Stephan Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
The United States Environmental Protection Agency allows for the use of a parent corporate guarantee as an additional financial responsibility mechanism for subsidiary owners and operators of hazardous waste facilities to comply with the third-party liability requirements of 40 C.F.R. sections 264.147 and 265.147. Regardless whether this guarantee is defined as "insurance," it is enforceable against the parent company. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 40-2702; K.A.R. 28-31-8; 40 C.F.R. sections 264.147; 265.147.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Author: Robert T. Stephan