Assessing and Reporting Military Readiness PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Assessing and Reporting Military Readiness PDF full book. Access full book title Assessing and Reporting Military Readiness by Great Britain: National Audit Office. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Great Britain: National Audit Office Publisher: The Stationery Office ISBN: 9780102932805 Category : History Languages : en Pages : 52
Book Description
Readiness is the term used to describe the means by which the Ministry of Defence holds its military forces at varying levels of preparedness to respond to emerging operations. An effective system for assessing and reporting military readiness is a key part of modern armed forces capability, in order to manage risks and address any deficiencies and plan for the future. This has become increasingly important in recent years given the unpredictable nature of the current security environment. This NAO report finds that the MoD has a good system for reporting the readiness of its armed forces, although there is scope for further improvement, both to better define and measure its Public Service Agreement target for readiness, and to manage the main areas of risk, such as logistic support.
Author: Great Britain: National Audit Office Publisher: The Stationery Office ISBN: 9780102932805 Category : History Languages : en Pages : 52
Book Description
Readiness is the term used to describe the means by which the Ministry of Defence holds its military forces at varying levels of preparedness to respond to emerging operations. An effective system for assessing and reporting military readiness is a key part of modern armed forces capability, in order to manage risks and address any deficiencies and plan for the future. This has become increasingly important in recent years given the unpredictable nature of the current security environment. This NAO report finds that the MoD has a good system for reporting the readiness of its armed forces, although there is scope for further improvement, both to better define and measure its Public Service Agreement target for readiness, and to manage the main areas of risk, such as logistic support.
Author: Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Committee of Public Accounts Publisher: ISBN: Category : Military readiness Languages : en Pages : 45
Author: General accounting office washington dc national security and international affairs div Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 47
Book Description
DOD'S readiness assessment system is designed to assess and report on military readiness at three levels (1) at the individual unit level; (2) at the joint force level; and (3) at the aggregate, or strategic, level. "Unit readiness" refers to the ability of units, such as Army divisions, Navy ships, and Air Force wings, to provide capabilities required of the combatant commands and is derived from the ability of each unit to deliver the outputs for which it was designed. "Joint readiness" is the combatant commands' ability to integrate and synchronize units from one or more services to execute missions. "Strategic readiness" is a synthesis of unit and joint readiness and concerns the ability of the armed forces as a whole, to include the services, the combatant commands, and the combat support agencies, to fight and meet the demands of the national security strategy. Strategic readiness focuses on broad functional areas, such as intelligence and mobility, that meet worldwide demands.
Author: Sharon L. Pickup Publisher: DIANE Publishing ISBN: 1437987001 Category : Technology & Engineering Languages : en Pages : 40
Book Description
To obtain visibility of the capabilities of its military forces, the Department of Defense has developed an enterprise of interconnected readiness reporting systems. In 2010, to better meet the info. needs of their leaders, the Army and Marine Corps implemented new reporting requirements. This report reviews recent readiness reporting changes. It assesses the extent that: (1) current readiness reporting policies have affected the content of readiness info. provided to decision makers; (2) the services have consistently implemented their new policies; and (3) changes to the Army, Marine Corps, and Office of the Sec. of Defense systems have affected the Defense Readiness Reporting System. Charts and tables. A print on demand report.
Author: Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Committee of Public Accounts Publisher: Stationery Office ISBN: 9780215027504 Category : Technology & Engineering Languages : en Pages : 45
Book Description
The Ministry of Defence has developed a sophisticated system for defining, measuring and reporting on the readiness of the Armed Forces. Following a report from the Comptroller and Auditor General (HC 72, 2005-06) the Committee looked at two issues: the readiness reporting system and operational commitments; and logistic risks to readiness. It found that almost a third of forces had serious or critical weaknesses in their required peacetime readiness levels and that the Armed Forces were still recovering from large scale operations in Iraq and for five of the past six years they have been operating above the most demanding combination of scenarios envisaged in defence planning assumptions. The increased strains on the materiel of the Armed Forces are shown by the rise in equipment cannibalisation and redirection of resources from support of the Royal Navy.
Author: GAo Publisher: ISBN: 9781481170987 Category : Languages : en Pages : 40
Book Description
Current Army and Marine Corps guidance has generally improved the quantity and objectivity of readiness information available to decision makers. As in the past, Army Regulation 220-1 and Marine Corps Order 3000.13 direct units to report on two types of missions-the core missions for which units were designed as well as any other missions they may be assigned, but recent changes to the guidance also added new requirements. Units must now provide objective, personnel and equipment data to supplement commanders'assessments of their units' assigned mission capabilities. The updated service guidance also provides additional criteria, which are intended to help unit commanders consistently assess their units' mission capabilities. The newdata and additional mission assessment criteria improve the objectivity and consistency of readiness information provided to decision makers. However, to clearly identify units that recently returned from deployment, the Armyregulation now requires units to uniformly report a specific service directed readiness level rather than assess and report the unit's actual readiness level.As a result, decision makers lack a complete picture of the readiness of some units that could be called upon to respond to contingencies.While the Army and Marine Corps have taken steps to implement the revised readiness reporting guidance, units are inconsistently reporting readiness in some areas. GAO site visits to 33 Army and 20 Marine Corps units revealedthat units were using inconsistent reporting time frames, and GAO data analysis showed that 49 percent of Marine Corps reports submitted between May 2010 and January 2011 were late. Furthermore, units are reporting equipment and personnel numbers differently, and some units are not linking their two types of mission assessments, in accordance with current guidance.The federal standards for internal control state management must continually assess and evaluate its internal controls to assure that the control activities being used are effective and updated when necessary. However, Marine Corpsand Army quality assurance reviews have not identified all the inconsistencies and system mechanisms are not preventing the submission of inconsistent data. Until internal controls improve, decision makers will continue to rely onreadiness information that is based on inconsistent reporting.