Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Argumentación constitucional PDF full book. Access full book title Argumentación constitucional by Manuel Atienza. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Manuel Atienza Publisher: Porrua Hermanos ISBN: 9786070906909 Category : Constitutional law Languages : es Pages : 221
Book Description
Reflexiones de diversos autores que versan sobre la teoría y la práctica de la argumentación jurídica constitucional, se analizan sentencias del Tribunal Electoral, relativas a temas como el ejercicio de los derechos electorales en comunidades indígenas y la vida interna de los partidos políticos, así como de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación en materia de acciones de inconstitucionalidad.
Author: Manuel Atienza Publisher: Porrua Hermanos ISBN: 9786070906909 Category : Constitutional law Languages : es Pages : 221
Book Description
Reflexiones de diversos autores que versan sobre la teoría y la práctica de la argumentación jurídica constitucional, se analizan sentencias del Tribunal Electoral, relativas a temas como el ejercicio de los derechos electorales en comunidades indígenas y la vida interna de los partidos políticos, así como de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación en materia de acciones de inconstitucionalidad.
Author: Eveline T. Feteris Publisher: Springer ISBN: 9402411291 Category : Philosophy Languages : en Pages : 371
Book Description
This book is an updated and revised edition of Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation published in 1999. It discusses new developments that have taken place in the past 15 years in research of legal argumentation, legal justification and legal interpretation, as well as the implications of these new developments for the theory of legal argumentation. Almost every chapter has been revised and updated, and the chapters include discussions of recent studies, major additions on topical issues, new perspectives, and new developments in several theoretical areas. Examples of these additions are discussions of recent developments in such areas as Habermas' theory, MacCormick's theory, Alexy's theory, Artificial Intelligence and law, and the pragma-dialectical theory of legal argumentation. Furthermore it provides an extensive and systematic overview of approaches and studies of legal argumentation in the context of legal justification in various legal systems and countries that have been important for the development of research of legal argumentation. The book contains a discussion of influential theories that conceive the law and legal justification as argumentative activity. From different disciplinary and theoretical angles it addresses such topics as the institutional characteristics of the law and the relation between general standards for moral discussions and legal standards such as the Rule of Law. It discusses patterns of legal justification in the context of different types of problems in the application of the law and it describes rules for rational legal discussions. The combination of the sound basis of the first edition and the discussions of new developments make this new edition an up-to-date and comprehensive survey of the various theoretical influences which have informed the study of legal argumentation. It discusses salient backgrounds to this field as well as major approaches and trends in the contemporary research. It surveys the relevant theoretical factors both from various continental law traditions and common law countries.
Author: Nicholas Papaspyrou Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing ISBN: 1509917195 Category : Law Languages : en Pages : 474
Book Description
US constitutional jurisprudence often conflates two distinct enquiries: how to interpret the Constitution and how to allocate interpretive authority. This book explains the distinct role of judgements about interpretive authority in constitutional practice. It argues that these judgements do not determine what qualifies as good constitutional argument, and cannot substitute for it. Rather, they specify the division of labour between the political branches and the judiciary in forming applicable constitutional determinations. This explanation of the structure of constitutional reasoning sets the stage for the development of a normative theory about each enquiry. The book advances a theory of substantive constitutional argument. It argues that constitutional interpretation is a special kind of practical reasoning, aiming to construct and specify morally sound accounts of the Constitution and surrounding constitutional practice. Yet, this task is entrusted to a scheme of institutions, as agents of free and equal citizens. The standard of review is an interlocking component of that scheme, regulating the judicial assignment. As such, it should aim to facilitate best performance of the overall interpretive task, so that the judicial process settles on appropriate constitutional determinations; grounded on morally sound reasons that reach all citizens and uphold the fundamental commitments to freedom and equal citizenship.
Author: Manuel Atienza
Author: Manuel Atienza
Author: Eveline T. Feteris
Author: Francisco Javier Ezquiaga Ganuzas
Author: Edgar José Moya Millán
Author: Luis Fernando Torres
Author: Nicholas Papaspyrou
Author: Alessio Sardo
Author: Jorge E. Zavala Egas
Author: F. Javier Ezquiaga Ganuzas
Author: