Author: Institute for Wisconsin's Future
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Academic achievement
Languages : en
Pages : 68
Book Description
Are School Revenue Limits Limiting Learning?
Author: Institute for Wisconsin's Future
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Academic achievement
Languages : en
Pages : 68
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Academic achievement
Languages : en
Pages : 68
Book Description
Revenue and Revenue Limits
Author: Paul M. Goldfinger
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 148
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 148
Book Description
Limiting Learning
Author: Howard Wial
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 17
Book Description
The Pennsylvania legislature is considering a school finance proposal, exemplified by House Bill 113 of the 2003 legislative session, that would shift some school funding away from local property taxes and toward state funds and local income taxes. The proposal would give greater proportional benefits to homeowners with lower property values. A shift toward broader-based and less regressive tax funding of the public schools would be admirable, as would the progressive nature of the proposed property tax relief. However, the proposal has two harmful features: (1) It would do virtually nothing to change the total revenue available to any school district in the state, but would simply replace some revenue that each district currently raises from local property taxes with revenue from local income taxes and additional state funds. In so doing, it would perpetuate Pennsylvania's current, highly inequitable pattern of school funding; and (2) It would impose a limit on increases in school tax rates in each district and prevent districts from obtaining additional revenue from new taxes. A district would be able to override these limits through voter approval in a referendum.One source of evidence is the research literature on outcomes in other states that have imposed limits on school taxes and funding. Although the details of limits imposed vary from state to state and no separate research analyzes proposals exactly like the Pennsylvania proposal, the literature on other states that have imposed limits is the best available gauge of the impact of a similar Pennsylvania proposal. This briefing paper reviews this research literature. (Contains 22 endnotes.).
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 17
Book Description
The Pennsylvania legislature is considering a school finance proposal, exemplified by House Bill 113 of the 2003 legislative session, that would shift some school funding away from local property taxes and toward state funds and local income taxes. The proposal would give greater proportional benefits to homeowners with lower property values. A shift toward broader-based and less regressive tax funding of the public schools would be admirable, as would the progressive nature of the proposed property tax relief. However, the proposal has two harmful features: (1) It would do virtually nothing to change the total revenue available to any school district in the state, but would simply replace some revenue that each district currently raises from local property taxes with revenue from local income taxes and additional state funds. In so doing, it would perpetuate Pennsylvania's current, highly inequitable pattern of school funding; and (2) It would impose a limit on increases in school tax rates in each district and prevent districts from obtaining additional revenue from new taxes. A district would be able to override these limits through voter approval in a referendum.One source of evidence is the research literature on outcomes in other states that have imposed limits on school taxes and funding. Although the details of limits imposed vary from state to state and no separate research analyzes proposals exactly like the Pennsylvania proposal, the literature on other states that have imposed limits is the best available gauge of the impact of a similar Pennsylvania proposal. This briefing paper reviews this research literature. (Contains 22 endnotes.).
School Finance
Author: Arthur J. Townley
Publisher: Kendall Hunt
ISBN: 9780757515842
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 252
Book Description
Publisher: Kendall Hunt
ISBN: 9780757515842
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 252
Book Description
Revenues and Limits
Author: Paul M. Goldfinger
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 70
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 70
Book Description
Minnesota School Finance
Author: Marsha Gronseth
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 88
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 88
Book Description
The Effects of Rate Limits on Property Tax Revenues and School Expenditures
Author: Elizabeth Plummer
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
In 1993, Texas established a maximum 1.5 percent property tax rate that school districts could impose for purposes of funding their maintenance and operations (M&O). Tax limits are intended to contain government growth and increase the efficiency of government services. Almost all states use property tax limits, and their use continues to increase as states consider ways to decrease the growth in property taxes. This study examines whether the 1.5 percent rate limit lowered the growth of M&O tax revenues and school expenditures, whether these effects differed in the short run vs. long run, and whether school districts increased other tax and non tax revenue sources to help compensate for lower M&O tax revenues. This study also examines whether the rate limit affected student performance. We use a sample of 1,033 Texas school districts over the period 1994 through 2004, and the Heckman MLE approach to help control for selection bias. We find that the 1.5 percent rate limit decreased the growth of M&O tax revenues and school expenditures, and that expenditures were affected less than M&O tax revenues. Our results suggest that districts helped cushion the rate limit's effect on expenditures by increasing their debt related tax revenues. We find only limited evidence that the rate limit's effects differed in the short-run vs. long run. Finally, we find that student test scores are lower for districts at the 1.5 percent rate limit, and that the decrease in test scores is larger for economically disadvantaged students relative to other students. This suggests that the rate limit is associated with decreases in education quality.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
In 1993, Texas established a maximum 1.5 percent property tax rate that school districts could impose for purposes of funding their maintenance and operations (M&O). Tax limits are intended to contain government growth and increase the efficiency of government services. Almost all states use property tax limits, and their use continues to increase as states consider ways to decrease the growth in property taxes. This study examines whether the 1.5 percent rate limit lowered the growth of M&O tax revenues and school expenditures, whether these effects differed in the short run vs. long run, and whether school districts increased other tax and non tax revenue sources to help compensate for lower M&O tax revenues. This study also examines whether the rate limit affected student performance. We use a sample of 1,033 Texas school districts over the period 1994 through 2004, and the Heckman MLE approach to help control for selection bias. We find that the 1.5 percent rate limit decreased the growth of M&O tax revenues and school expenditures, and that expenditures were affected less than M&O tax revenues. Our results suggest that districts helped cushion the rate limit's effect on expenditures by increasing their debt related tax revenues. We find only limited evidence that the rate limit's effects differed in the short-run vs. long run. Finally, we find that student test scores are lower for districts at the 1.5 percent rate limit, and that the decrease in test scores is larger for economically disadvantaged students relative to other students. This suggests that the rate limit is associated with decreases in education quality.
State Support for Public Education
Author: United States. Office of Education. National survey of school finance
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 284
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 284
Book Description
A Compilation of School District and County ... Revenue Limits Computed by County Superintendents of Schools Pursuant to Senate Bill 90/1972 and Subsequent Legislation
Revenue/expenditure Limits and Override Elections
Author: Jack W. Osman
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 62
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 62
Book Description