Analysis of Two Alternative Management Systems for the Production of Fall Born Beef Calves in Western Oregon PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Analysis of Two Alternative Management Systems for the Production of Fall Born Beef Calves in Western Oregon PDF full book. Access full book title Analysis of Two Alternative Management Systems for the Production of Fall Born Beef Calves in Western Oregon by John Gerald Rosecrans. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: John Gerald Rosecrans Publisher: ISBN: Category : Beef cattle Languages : en Pages : 142
Book Description
Two management systems were evaluated in terms of the effects on calf growth, on calf weight produced per cow per year, and on reproductive performance of fall calving cows. The alternative management systems tested were twin foster calf production and, delayed weaning, production of single suckled calves weaned at the end of the spring forage production season. Fall born calves which were single suckled and weaned at approximately 200 days of age served as controls. An evaluation of the effects of twin fostering on maternal-filial behavior and of the effects of cross suckling on calf growth in early life was also conducted. Delayed weaning was evaluated as a model for the demonstration of the effects of metabolizable protein intake on calf growth. Calves used in these studies were born during September and October of 1979. Control (C) calves were weaned at approximately 200 days of age, twin forster (TW) and delayed weaned (DW) single calves were weaned at approximately 291 days of age. Twin fostering resulted in calves 39 kg lighter at 200 days of age than single suckled calves (P
Author: John Gerald Rosecrans Publisher: ISBN: Category : Beef cattle Languages : en Pages : 142
Book Description
Two management systems were evaluated in terms of the effects on calf growth, on calf weight produced per cow per year, and on reproductive performance of fall calving cows. The alternative management systems tested were twin foster calf production and, delayed weaning, production of single suckled calves weaned at the end of the spring forage production season. Fall born calves which were single suckled and weaned at approximately 200 days of age served as controls. An evaluation of the effects of twin fostering on maternal-filial behavior and of the effects of cross suckling on calf growth in early life was also conducted. Delayed weaning was evaluated as a model for the demonstration of the effects of metabolizable protein intake on calf growth. Calves used in these studies were born during September and October of 1979. Control (C) calves were weaned at approximately 200 days of age, twin forster (TW) and delayed weaned (DW) single calves were weaned at approximately 291 days of age. Twin fostering resulted in calves 39 kg lighter at 200 days of age than single suckled calves (P
Author: Wade H. Shafer Publisher: Springer ISBN: 9780306416613 Category : Science Languages : en Pages : 352
Book Description
This series lists applicable thesis titles published in the United States and Canada. Volume 40 covers thesis year 1995. All back volumes are still available.
Author: Thomas Lee Nordblom Publisher: ISBN: Category : Beef cattle Languages : en Pages : 178
Book Description
The traditional practice on beef cow-calf ranches in the high desert region of Eastern Oregon has been to breed the cows to calve in the Spring months. Interest has been growing recently in the practice of Fall-calving; that is, breeding cows to calve in the months of October and November. The Squaw Butte Experiment Station at Burns, Oregon, began a Fall-calving program with part of their range beef herd several years ago. They found that climatic conditions are generally more favorable for calving in the Fall, resulting in higher weaned-calf percentages. Calves from both Spring and Fall-calving herds were weaned in late Summer, with Fall calves averaging around 500 pounds compared with 330 pounds for the Spring calves. There was little doubt about the biological feasibility of the Fall-calving practice in that area, but its economic feasibility was somewhat in question. The purpose of this research was to analyze the economic aspects of Fall-calving and determine what are the most important factors in deciding its economic feasibility. A linear programming model was developed for comparing Fall and Spring-calving systems under different conditions. The model was designed to maximize net returns to labor, management and fixed resources in the beef enterprise. This model took account of range forage utilization patterns. Solutions from the model indicated that Spring-calving systems may have slightly higher net returns than Fall-calving because of two main differences: (1) the lighter Spring-born calves bring a higher average price per cwt., and (2) the Fall-calving herd requires about 1500 pounds more Winter hay than cows in the Spring-calving herd. An algebraic relationship was found between calf price differentials and the price of meadow hay, which would equate the net return values for Spring and Fall-calving systems. With an expected differential of $2. 95, between the average prices of calves sold from the Spring and Fall-calving herds, it was found that a price as low as $14.12 per ton of meadow hay would be needed to equate the net returns of a Fall-calving system with those of a Spring-calving system (with calf sales on September 1). Labor costs were not included in the model, but the ranch operator's labor situation may well be the most important element in his decision to go with Fall rather than Spring calving. The main difference is in the times of the year that labor is needed. The Fall-calving system needs more labor in the Fall, and the Spring-calving system needs even more in the Spring.
Author: Eugene Duane Panasuk Publisher: ISBN: Category : Calves Languages : en Pages : 176
Book Description
Ranchers in the high desert area of Eastern Oregon traditionally market their calves when they are weaned in late fall. This is the time when the market prices for calves are at a seasonal low. In this study the economic feasibility of various alternative management and marketing strategies for the utilization of range forage with a spring calving operation is determined. The operational objectives were (1) to determine the most profitable time and weight to market the spring-born calves, (2) to determine whether supplementary feeding of yearlings is economically feasible, (3) to explore the competitive relationship between cows and yearlings for limited range forage, and (4) to determine the combination of beef production and growing activities which will provide the highest net returns. Linear programming was used to determine the combination of activities that would maximize net returns subject to the constraint of forage quality and quantity. The quality and quantity of the range forage was determined by using data provided by the Squaw Butte Experiment Station, Burns, Oregon. All the basic data pertaining to the high desert area were obtained from Squaw Butte. The initial L.P. solution indicated the heifers should be sold March 1 at 600 pounds having been fed to gain 1.5 pounds per day while the steers were sold April 16 at 780 pounds, gaining 2.0 pounds per day. The cows earned a higher MVP for the limited resource, range forage, than could the yearlings either with or without supplementary feeding. In the second solution barley price was reduced from $50 to $45 per ton and the steers were sold April 16 at 780 pounds (same as initial solution). The heifers were sold June 16 weighing 900 pounds having been fed to gain 2.0 pounds per day. Supplementary feed was provided on the range for these heifers from April 16 to June 15. The study shows that the traditional management and marketing practice is not the most profitable alternative. The feed costs are less than the increase in income from feeding the animals to heavier weights.
Author: John Gerald Rosecrans
Author: John Gerald Rosecrans
Author: Wade H. Shafer
Author: Oregon State University
Author: Thomas Lee Nordblom
Author: John F. Vallentine
Author: 
Author: Eugene Duane Panasuk
Author: Ellen Blair Manson Vaughan
Author: Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station
Author: Conseil des productions animales du Québec