Author: Veritas
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Capital punishment
Languages : en
Pages : 38
Book Description
A Brief Statement of the Argument for the Abolition of the Death Punishment
Author: Veritas
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Capital punishment
Languages : en
Pages : 38
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Capital punishment
Languages : en
Pages : 38
Book Description
Against Capital Punishment
Author: Benjamin S. Yost
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0190901179
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 297
Book Description
The specter of procedural injustice motivates many popular and scholarly objections to capital punishment. So-called proceduralist arguments against the death penalty are attractive to death penalty abolitionists because they sidestep the controversies that bedevil moral critiques of execution. Proceduralists do not shoulder the burden of demonstrating that heinous murderers deserve a punishment less than death. However, proceduralist arguments often pay insufficient attention to the importance of punishment; many imply the highly contentious claim that no type of criminal sanction is legitimate. In Against Capital Punishment, Benjamin S. Yost revitalizes the core of proceduralism both by examining the connection between procedural injustice and the impermissibility of capital punishment and by offering a comprehensive argument of his own which confronts proceduralism's most significant shortcomings. Yost is the first author to develop and defend the irrevocability argument against capital punishment, demonstrating that the irremediability of execution renders capital punishment impermissible. His contention is not that the act of execution is immoral, but rather that the possibility of irrevocable mistakes precludes the just administration of the death penalty. Shoring up proceduralist arguments for the abolition of the death penalty, Against Capital Punishment carries with it implications not only for the continued use of the death penalty in the criminal justice system, but also for the structure and integrity of the system as a whole.
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0190901179
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 297
Book Description
The specter of procedural injustice motivates many popular and scholarly objections to capital punishment. So-called proceduralist arguments against the death penalty are attractive to death penalty abolitionists because they sidestep the controversies that bedevil moral critiques of execution. Proceduralists do not shoulder the burden of demonstrating that heinous murderers deserve a punishment less than death. However, proceduralist arguments often pay insufficient attention to the importance of punishment; many imply the highly contentious claim that no type of criminal sanction is legitimate. In Against Capital Punishment, Benjamin S. Yost revitalizes the core of proceduralism both by examining the connection between procedural injustice and the impermissibility of capital punishment and by offering a comprehensive argument of his own which confronts proceduralism's most significant shortcomings. Yost is the first author to develop and defend the irrevocability argument against capital punishment, demonstrating that the irremediability of execution renders capital punishment impermissible. His contention is not that the act of execution is immoral, but rather that the possibility of irrevocable mistakes precludes the just administration of the death penalty. Shoring up proceduralist arguments for the abolition of the death penalty, Against Capital Punishment carries with it implications not only for the continued use of the death penalty in the criminal justice system, but also for the structure and integrity of the system as a whole.
A Brief Statement of the Argument for the Abolition of the Death Punishment. In Twelve Essays
Author: Veritas
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Capital punishment
Languages : en
Pages : 26
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Capital punishment
Languages : en
Pages : 26
Book Description
The Case Against the Death Penalty
Author: Hugo Adam Bedau
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780914031017
Category : Capital punishment
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780914031017
Category : Capital punishment
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Moving Away from the Death Penalty
Author: Ivan Šimonović
Publisher: UN
ISBN: 9789211542158
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 212
Book Description
Capital punishment is irrevocable. It prohibits the correction of mistakes by the justice system and leaves no room for human error, with the gravest of consequences. There is no evidence of a deterrent effect of the death penalty. Those sacrificed on the altar of retributive justice are almost always the most vulnerable. This book covers a wide range of topics, from the discriminatory application of the death penalty, wrongful convictions, proven lack of deterrence effect, to legality of the capital punishment under international law and the morality of taking of human life.
Publisher: UN
ISBN: 9789211542158
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 212
Book Description
Capital punishment is irrevocable. It prohibits the correction of mistakes by the justice system and leaves no room for human error, with the gravest of consequences. There is no evidence of a deterrent effect of the death penalty. Those sacrificed on the altar of retributive justice are almost always the most vulnerable. This book covers a wide range of topics, from the discriminatory application of the death penalty, wrongful convictions, proven lack of deterrence effect, to legality of the capital punishment under international law and the morality of taking of human life.
The Death Penalty
Author: Ernest Van den Haag
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 1489927875
Category : Social Science
Languages : en
Pages : 314
Book Description
From 1965 until 1980, there was a virtual moratorium on executions for capital offenses in the United States. This was due primarily to protracted legal proceedings challenging the death penalty on constitutional grounds. After much Sturm und Drang, the Supreme Court of the United States, by a divided vote, finally decided that "the death penalty does not invariably violate the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment." The Court's decisions, however, do not moot the controversy about the death penalty or render this excellent book irrelevant. The ball is now in the court of the Legislature and the Executive. Leg islatures, federal and state, can impose or abolish the death penalty, within the guidelines prescribed by the Supreme Court. A Chief Executive can commute a death sentence. And even the Supreme Court can change its mind, as it has done on many occasions and did, with respect to various aspects of the death penalty itself, durlog the moratorium period. Also, the people can change their minds. Some time ago, a majority, according to reliable polls, favored abolition. Today, a substantial majority favors imposition of the death penalty. The pendulum can swing again, as it has done in the past.
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 1489927875
Category : Social Science
Languages : en
Pages : 314
Book Description
From 1965 until 1980, there was a virtual moratorium on executions for capital offenses in the United States. This was due primarily to protracted legal proceedings challenging the death penalty on constitutional grounds. After much Sturm und Drang, the Supreme Court of the United States, by a divided vote, finally decided that "the death penalty does not invariably violate the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment." The Court's decisions, however, do not moot the controversy about the death penalty or render this excellent book irrelevant. The ball is now in the court of the Legislature and the Executive. Leg islatures, federal and state, can impose or abolish the death penalty, within the guidelines prescribed by the Supreme Court. A Chief Executive can commute a death sentence. And even the Supreme Court can change its mind, as it has done on many occasions and did, with respect to various aspects of the death penalty itself, durlog the moratorium period. Also, the people can change their minds. Some time ago, a majority, according to reliable polls, favored abolition. Today, a substantial majority favors imposition of the death penalty. The pendulum can swing again, as it has done in the past.
Report in favor of the abolition of punishment of death, by law, made to the Legislature of the State of New York. April 14. 1841. Second edition
Author: John Louis O'SULLIVAN
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 180
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 180
Book Description
Debating the Death Penalty
Author: Hugo Adam Bedau
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0195179803
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 257
Book Description
Experts on both side of the issue speak out both for and against capital punishment and the rationale behind their individual beliefs.
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0195179803
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 257
Book Description
Experts on both side of the issue speak out both for and against capital punishment and the rationale behind their individual beliefs.
Report in Favor of the Abolition of the Punishment of Death by Law
Author: New York (State). Legislature. Assembly. Select Committee on Capital Punishment
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Capital punishment
Languages : en
Pages : 176
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Capital punishment
Languages : en
Pages : 176
Book Description
The Death Penalty
Author: Louis P. Pojman
Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
ISBN: 0585080682
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 189
Book Description
Two distinguished social and political philosophers take opposing positions in this highly engaging work. Louis P. Pojman justifies the practice of execution by appealing to the principle of retribution: we deserve to be rewarded and punished according to the virtue or viciousness of our actions. He asserts that the death penalty does deter some potential murderers and that we risk the lives of innocent people who might otherwise live if we refuse to execute those deserving that punishment. Jeffrey Reiman argues that although the death penalty is a just punishment for murder, we are not morally obliged to execute murderers. Since we lack conclusive evidence that executing murderers is an effective deterrent and because we can foster the advance of civilization by demonstrating our intolerance for cruelty in our unwillingness to kill those who kill others, Reiman concludes that it is good in principle to avoid the death penalty, and bad in practice to impose it.
Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
ISBN: 0585080682
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 189
Book Description
Two distinguished social and political philosophers take opposing positions in this highly engaging work. Louis P. Pojman justifies the practice of execution by appealing to the principle of retribution: we deserve to be rewarded and punished according to the virtue or viciousness of our actions. He asserts that the death penalty does deter some potential murderers and that we risk the lives of innocent people who might otherwise live if we refuse to execute those deserving that punishment. Jeffrey Reiman argues that although the death penalty is a just punishment for murder, we are not morally obliged to execute murderers. Since we lack conclusive evidence that executing murderers is an effective deterrent and because we can foster the advance of civilization by demonstrating our intolerance for cruelty in our unwillingness to kill those who kill others, Reiman concludes that it is good in principle to avoid the death penalty, and bad in practice to impose it.