WHAT WOULD PROPOSITION 36 MEAN FOR CALIFORNIA? - P - Budget Brief JUNE 2005 PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download WHAT WOULD PROPOSITION 36 MEAN FOR CALIFORNIA? - P - Budget Brief JUNE 2005 PDF full book. Access full book title WHAT WOULD PROPOSITION 36 MEAN FOR CALIFORNIA? - P - Budget Brief JUNE 2005 by . Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 0
Book Description
Specifi cally, this offender would receive a sentence that is twice the length of the standard term for the crime, rather than a 25-years-to-life sentence as required by current law. [...] This option would be available to third strikers whose current felony is not classifi ed as violent or serious and "who have not committed specifi ed current and prior offenses, such as certain drug-, sex-, and gun-related felonies."6 In general, judges would be required to resentence a third striker who meets these criteria, with the new sentence equaling twice the standard term for the offender'. [...] The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) estimates that the measure's resentencing provisions could reduce the prison population by more than 2,700 in 2013- 14, as many third strikers receive shorter terms and are released.7 Key Facts About Second and Third Strikers While the striker population initially increased rapidly following the implementation of Three Strikes, the rate of gr. [...] It is simply not fair to the victims of crime to have to relive the pain of resentencing and early release of these dangerous criminals."18 Conclusion Proposition 36 would amend the state's "Three Strikes" law to shorten prison sentences for many offenders who receive a third strike for a nonviolent, nonserious felony. [...] In addition to creating two new categories of offenders, the Three Strikes law limited the number of credits that "strikers" can earn to reduce their prison terms and required strikers who are convicted of multiple crimes to serve consecutive rather than concurrent sentences.
Author: Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 0
Book Description
Specifi cally, this offender would receive a sentence that is twice the length of the standard term for the crime, rather than a 25-years-to-life sentence as required by current law. [...] This option would be available to third strikers whose current felony is not classifi ed as violent or serious and "who have not committed specifi ed current and prior offenses, such as certain drug-, sex-, and gun-related felonies."6 In general, judges would be required to resentence a third striker who meets these criteria, with the new sentence equaling twice the standard term for the offender'. [...] The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) estimates that the measure's resentencing provisions could reduce the prison population by more than 2,700 in 2013- 14, as many third strikers receive shorter terms and are released.7 Key Facts About Second and Third Strikers While the striker population initially increased rapidly following the implementation of Three Strikes, the rate of gr. [...] It is simply not fair to the victims of crime to have to relive the pain of resentencing and early release of these dangerous criminals."18 Conclusion Proposition 36 would amend the state's "Three Strikes" law to shorten prison sentences for many offenders who receive a third strike for a nonviolent, nonserious felony. [...] In addition to creating two new categories of offenders, the Three Strikes law limited the number of credits that "strikers" can earn to reduce their prison terms and required strikers who are convicted of multiple crimes to serve consecutive rather than concurrent sentences.
Author: Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 0
Book Description
Proposition 31 would allow the Legislature to override all or part of the Governor's executive order by a two-thirds vote of both the Assembly and the Senate.12 Proposition 31 Would Establish New "Paygo" Rules for Certain State Spending Increases and Tax Cuts The Legislature generally may pass bills that increase or reduce state spending by a majority vote of both the Assembly and the Senate.13 La. [...] The state Constitution requires the Legislature to send a balanced budget to the Governor.20 The Legislature determines which spending and revenue estimates to use in the budget bill and is not required to include or rely on estimates prepared by the Governor's Department of Finance (DOF). [...] In addition, the measure would require local governments to develop their budgets in an "open and transparent" manner that "encourages the participation of all aspects of the community." Proposition 31 Would Make Additional Changes to the State Legislative and Budget Processes Proposition 31 would make a number of additional changes to the state legislative and budget processes. [...] The state Constitution prohibits the Legislature from passing a bill "until the bill with amendments has been printed and distributed to the members."27 Proposition 31 would prohibit the Legislature from passing any bill "until the bill with amendments has been in print and distributed to the members and available to the public for at least 3 days." The only exception would be bills passed during. [...] Requiring Lawmakers To Include DOF Estimates in the Budget Bill Could Further Increase the Governor's Authority Over the State Budget Proposition 31 would require the Legislature to include the Governor's spending and revenue estimates - as prepared by the Department of Finance - in the budget bill "immediately prior" to passage of the budget.
Author: Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 0
Book Description
Increase the Price That State and Local Governments Pay When They Acquire Property Proposition 90 would require public agencies using eminent domain to pay property owners the highest price that the sale of the property would bring on the open market plus the cost of any legal fees and other expenses incurred by the property owner. [...] The value of property acquired through eminent domain would be based on "highest and best use." For property taken for a proprietary purpose, the value would depend on "the use to which the government intends to put the property, if such use results in a higher value for the land taken." For example, if a vacant parcel is condemned to build a school or hospital, the value of the land would be base. [...] Similarly, if a parcel of vacant land is acquired for use as a toll road, the price of the property would be based on the value of the property assuming the toll road is in place. [...] Thus, a city could not use eminent domain to obtain property that would be transferred to a developer for use as a shopping center; however, it could use eminent domain to obtain property that would be leased to a private contractor for use as a jail under contract to the city. [...] The LAO notes, for example, that Proposition 90 would require governments to reimburse property owners for a broader array of costs and expenses than is required by current law.13 How Would Proposition 90 Affect the Budget? The LAO fi nds that Proposition 90 could increase somewhat the amount that public agencies pay to acquire property through eminent domain and potentially increase the price wil.
Author: United States. Congress Publisher: ISBN: Category : Law Languages : en Pages : 1414
Book Description
The Congressional Record is the official record of the proceedings and debates of the United States Congress. It is published daily when Congress is in session. The Congressional Record began publication in 1873. Debates for sessions prior to 1873 are recorded in The Debates and Proceedings in the Congress of the United States (1789-1824), the Register of Debates in Congress (1824-1837), and the Congressional Globe (1833-1873)
Author: Richard Sander Publisher: Basic Books ISBN: 0465030017 Category : Law Languages : en Pages : 370
Book Description
The debate over affirmative action has raged for over four decades, with little give on either side. Most agree that it began as noble effort to jump-start racial integration; many believe it devolved into a patently unfair system of quotas and concealment. Now, with the Supreme Court set to rule on a case that could sharply curtail the use of racial preferences in American universities, law professor Richard Sander and legal journalist Stuart Taylor offer a definitive account of what affirmative action has become, showing that while the objective is laudable, the effects have been anything but. Sander and Taylor have long admired affirmative action's original goals, but after many years of studying racial preferences, they have reached a controversial but undeniable conclusion: that preferences hurt underrepresented minorities far more than they help them. At the heart of affirmative action's failure is a simple phenomenon called mismatch. Using dramatic new data and numerous interviews with affected former students and university officials of color, the authors show how racial preferences often put students in competition with far better-prepared classmates, dooming many to fall so far behind that they can never catch up. Mismatch largely explains why, even though black applicants are more likely to enter college than whites with similar backgrounds, they are far less likely to finish; why there are so few black and Hispanic professionals with science and engineering degrees and doctorates; why black law graduates fail bar exams at four times the rate of whites; and why universities accept relatively affluent minorities over working class and poor people of all races. Sander and Taylor believe it is possible to achieve the goal of racial equality in higher education, but they argue that alternative policies -- such as full public disclosure of all preferential admission policies, a focused commitment to improving socioeconomic diversity on campuses, outreach to minority communities, and a renewed focus on K-12 schooling -- will go farther in achieving that goal than preferences, while also allowing applicants to make informed decisions. Bold, controversial, and deeply researched, Mismatch calls for a renewed examination of this most divisive of social programs -- and for reforms that will help realize the ultimate goal of racial equality.
Author: Peter Schrag Publisher: Univ of California Press ISBN: 9780520934474 Category : History Languages : en Pages : 356
Book Description
Peter Schrag takes on the big issues immigration, globalization, and the impact of California's politics on its quality of life in this dynamic account of the Golden State's struggle to recapture the American dream. In the past half-century, California has been both model and anti-model for the nation and often the world, first for its high level of government and public services schools, universities, highways and latterly for its dysfunctional government, deteriorating services, and sometimes regressive public policies. "California "explains how many current "solutions" exacerbate the very problems they're supposed to solve and analyzes a variety of possible state and federal policy alternatives to restore government accountability and a vital democracy to the nation's most populous state and the world's fifth-largest economy.
Author: Peter Schrag Publisher: Univ of California Press ISBN: 0520931823 Category : Social Science Languages : en Pages : 341
Book Description
Peter Schrag takes on the big issues—immigration, globalization, and the impact of California’s politics on its quality of life—in this dynamic account of the Golden State’s struggle to recapture the American dream. In the past half-century, California has been both model and anti-model for the nation and often the world, first in its high level of government and public services—schools, universities, highways—more lately for its dysfunctional government, deteriorating services, and sometimes regressive public policies. Schrag’s incisive analysis of the state’s political, demographic, and fiscal realities vividly demonstrates that it has been struggling with a range of problems for a generation. The author deftly shows that California’s ability to forge its culturally and ethnically diverse population into a successful democracy will be of crucial importance not only to America, but to the world. He also explains how many current "solutions" exacerbate the very problems they're supposed to solve and analyzes a variety of possible state and federal policy alternatives to restore accountable government and a vital democracy to the nation's largest state and world's fifth largest economy. Among the issues that Schrag tackles: * The impact of Latino and Asian immigration and the emergence of California as the first large majority minority state * The globalization of California’s economy and culture * The growing reliance of voters on the initiative, referendum, and recall processes * The increasing instability of elected government * California as cultural avant-garde, from hippies to gay marriage
Author: 
Author: 
Author: 
Author: 
Author: United States. Congress
Author: Richard Sander
Author: Gerald C. Lubenow
Author: Peter Schrag
Author: 
Author: Peter Schrag
Author: