Author: Andrew W. KneppPublisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 106
Book Description
Weed Management Systems in No-tillage Glyphosate-resistant Soybean and Influence of Ammonium Sulfate on Glyphosate Activity
Author: Andrew W. KneppGlyphosate with and Without Residual Herbicides in No-till Glyphosate Resistant Soybeans
Author: Karen Ann CorriganThe Influence of Herbicide Formulation on Weed Control in Four Tillage Systems; Absorption, Translocation, and Metabolism of Bentazon in Tolerant and Susceptible Soybeans [Glycine Max (L.) Merr.]
![The Influence of Herbicide Formulation on Weed Control in Four Tillage Systems; Absorption, Translocation, and Metabolism of Bentazon in Tolerant and Susceptible Soybeans [Glycine Max (L.) Merr.] PDF](https://books.google.com/books/content/images/frontcover/EqeFgcHW-xUC?fife=w80-h100)
Author: Michael D. JohnsonWeed Management Systems for Conventional and Glyphosate-resistant Soybean Following Rice
Author: Larry G. HeatherlyPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Crop rotation
Languages : en
Pages : 20
Book Description
Integrated Weed Management and Herbicide Application Parameters for Herbicide-resistant Soybean in Kansas
Author: Chad Joseph LammersPublisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Integrated weed management and herbicide application practices were assessed in field and greenhouse studies to improve weed control in herbicide-resistant soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) grown in Kansas. The field study was conducted to evaluate weed control, soybean yield, and profitability in two herbicide-resistant soybean systems and two row spacings. 2,4-D-, glyphosate-, and glufosinate- resistant (Enlist E3) and isoxaflutole-, glyphosate-, and glufosinate- resistant (LLGT27) soybeans were planted in 38- and 76-cm row spacing for four site-years. Three herbicide treatments were evaluated in each system: pre-emergence herbicide only (PRE), PRE followed by early post-emergence (POST), and POST plus overlapping residual (POR). Weed control was evaluated every 2 weeks after PRE application through R7 soybean. Weed biomass was collected before POST applications and at R7 soybean. Soybean yield was recorded at harvest. Data were subjected to analysis of variance and means separation. In Ottawa during 2020, POST and POR treatments resulted in ≥ 99% control for all species four WAT, while PRE resulted in ≥ 84% control. Similarly, control at Ashland Bottoms was ≥ 90% for POST and POR treatments, while PRE resulted in 7% for isoxaflutole- 62% for 2,4-D-resistant soybeans. All treatments resulted in ≥ 95% control at Scandia in 2021. Row spacing had a minimal effect on weed control and mixed results for yield. In the greenhouse study, the objective was to determine the effect of herbicide combination, optimize carrier volume, and evaluate weed height on weed control. Co-applications of combinations of 2,4-D choline, glyphosate, and glufosinate were applied in carrier volumes of 93-, 140-, and 187- L ha−1to 5-, 10-, and 20-cm Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) and large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis L.). Visual ratings and above ground biomass were collected four weeks after treatment. Water-sensitive paper was also sprayed with the same herbicide combinations and carrier volumes to evaluate differences in spray coverage. Data were subjected to analysis of variance and means separation. Carrier volume did not affect Palmer amaranth or large crabgrass control. Control of 5-, 10-, and 20-cm Palmer amaranth was 100%, ≥ 91%, and 6.7 to 79%, respectively, and variation was caused by the herbicide combinations. 2,4-D plus glyphosate provided the greatest Palmer amaranth control. Large crabgrass control pooled for both experiments was ≥ 82% when treatments were applied at 5 cm, but control of 10- or 20-cm large crabgrass was reduced to 51 to 56%. There was a carrier volume by herbicide co-application interaction for the number of droplets deposited and percent area covered on water-sensitive paper. Co-applications containing glufosinate had more droplets than those not containing glufosinate. 2,4-D plus glyphosate had the smallest percent area covered, compared to the other herbicide co-applications. Data from the field study confirms that two-pass herbicide programs are superior to PRE- only programs, regardless of the inclusion of a layered residual herbicide. However, this research did not evaluate the impact of layered residual herbicides on weed seed production, which is crucial for long-term weed management. Results from the greenhouse study suggest that under ideal conditions, carrier volume is less important than herbicide combination and weed size for control of Palmer amaranth and large crabgrass.
Weed Community Responses to Cropping System Factors in Glyphosate-resistant Corn and Soybeans
Author: Mark Richard JeschkePublisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 334
Book Description
Two Soybean Cropping System Challenges
Author: Mark L. BernardsPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Soybean
Languages : en
Pages : 214
Book Description
Chemical Abstracts
Author: Partial Returns of Weed Management Systems in Herbicide-resistant and Conventional Soybean
Author: Angela Ann Midthurn-HensenPublisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 204
Book Description
Weed Control and Tank-mix Interactions in Soybean Resistant to Dicamba, Glyphosate, and Glufosinate
Author: Adam Louis ConstinePublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Electronic dissertations
Languages : en
Pages : 154
Book Description
XtendFlex® soybean is a new trait platform which confers resistance to three herbicide sites of action that include the active ingredients dicamba, glyphosate, and glufosinate. The ability to use these three herbicides in one system has generated new management questions. Field and greenhouse experiments were conducted in 2019 and 2020 to: 1) investigate weed control systems in conventional and no-tillage XtendFlex® soybean, and 2) identify any antagonistic or synergistic responses from herbicide-tank mixtures used in this system. Control of glyphosate-resistant (GR) waterhemp was optimized with PRE flumioxazin followed by (fb) POST glufosinate or dicamba alone or in combination with each other or glyphosate. Two-pass POST systems also controlled GR waterhemp as long as dicamba and/or glufosinate was used in each application. GR horseweed control was exceptional with all herbicide programs evaluated, except glyphosate alone EPOS or POST. Annual grass control was reduced with EPOS and POST glufosinate + dicamba tank-mixtures. In contrast, this combination was often additive or synergistic for both broadleaf and grass weed control in the greenhouse. Several glyphosate + glufosinate combinations were antagonistic, especially with broadleaf weeds. Dicamba + glyphosate was often antagonistic in the greenhouse but was additive or synergistic for GR waterhemp and GR horseweed control in the field. Antagonisms were often observed when all three herbicides were applied together; however, not all antagonisms resulted in poor control. This research provides growers insight into management strategies for various agronomically important weeds in XtendFlex® soybean. .