Author: Matthew Mark Simmons
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781423553281
Category : Executive power
Languages : en
Pages : 84
Book Description
The war powers debate that has occupied so much public attention in the decades following Vietnam has typically portrayed the Congress and the president engaged in a continuous constitutional struggle over institutional prerogatives. Although the war powers literature presents many explanations of why Congress has not been able to effectively control presidential war making, most studies seem to take one thing for granted: that Congress is motivated by a desire to do so. The present study challenges this central assumption and introduces a new methodology to examine congressional behavior during consideration of the Multinational Force in Lebanon Resolution (1983) and the Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (1991). Using Douglas Arnold's Logic of Congressional Action as a model, the researcher conducts a content analysis of congressional floor debate to determine if members of Congress are also motivated by electoral calculations when deciding matters of war and peace. The results indicate that in fact, members do seem to be motivated by electoral forces. Furthermore, the study reveals that content analysis can be a useful tool that holds the potential to make a significant contribution to both the war powers literature and to models of congressional action.
War Powers and the Logic of Congressional Action
Author: Matthew Mark Simmons
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781423553281
Category : Executive power
Languages : en
Pages : 84
Book Description
The war powers debate that has occupied so much public attention in the decades following Vietnam has typically portrayed the Congress and the president engaged in a continuous constitutional struggle over institutional prerogatives. Although the war powers literature presents many explanations of why Congress has not been able to effectively control presidential war making, most studies seem to take one thing for granted: that Congress is motivated by a desire to do so. The present study challenges this central assumption and introduces a new methodology to examine congressional behavior during consideration of the Multinational Force in Lebanon Resolution (1983) and the Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (1991). Using Douglas Arnold's Logic of Congressional Action as a model, the researcher conducts a content analysis of congressional floor debate to determine if members of Congress are also motivated by electoral calculations when deciding matters of war and peace. The results indicate that in fact, members do seem to be motivated by electoral forces. Furthermore, the study reveals that content analysis can be a useful tool that holds the potential to make a significant contribution to both the war powers literature and to models of congressional action.
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781423553281
Category : Executive power
Languages : en
Pages : 84
Book Description
The war powers debate that has occupied so much public attention in the decades following Vietnam has typically portrayed the Congress and the president engaged in a continuous constitutional struggle over institutional prerogatives. Although the war powers literature presents many explanations of why Congress has not been able to effectively control presidential war making, most studies seem to take one thing for granted: that Congress is motivated by a desire to do so. The present study challenges this central assumption and introduces a new methodology to examine congressional behavior during consideration of the Multinational Force in Lebanon Resolution (1983) and the Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (1991). Using Douglas Arnold's Logic of Congressional Action as a model, the researcher conducts a content analysis of congressional floor debate to determine if members of Congress are also motivated by electoral calculations when deciding matters of war and peace. The results indicate that in fact, members do seem to be motivated by electoral forces. Furthermore, the study reveals that content analysis can be a useful tool that holds the potential to make a significant contribution to both the war powers literature and to models of congressional action.
The Logic of Congressional Action
Author: R. Douglas Arnold
Publisher: Yale University Press
ISBN: 9780300056594
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 298
Book Description
Congress regularly enacts laws that benefit particular groups or localities while imposing costs on everyone else. Sometimes, however, Congress breaks free of such parochial concerns and enacts bills that serve the general public, not just special interest groups. In this important and original book, R. Douglas Arnold offers a theory that explains not only why special interests frequently triumph but also why the general public sometimes wins. By showing how legislative leaders build coalitions for both types of programs, he illuminates recent legislative decisions in such areas as economic, tax, and energy policy. Arnold's theory of policy making rests on a reinterpretation of the relationship between legislators' actions and their constituents' policy preferences. Most scholars explore the impact that citizens' existing policy preferences have on legislators' decisions. They ignore citizens who have no opinions because they assume that uninformed citizens cannot possibly affect legislators' choices. Arnold examines the influence of citizens' potential preferences, however, and argues that legislators also respond to these preferences in order to avoid future electoral problems. He shows how legislators estimate the political consequences of their voting decisions, taking into account both the existing preferences of attentive citizens and the potential preferences of inattentive citizens. He then analyzes how coalition leaders manipulate the legislative situation in order to make it attractive for legislators to support a general interest bill.
Publisher: Yale University Press
ISBN: 9780300056594
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 298
Book Description
Congress regularly enacts laws that benefit particular groups or localities while imposing costs on everyone else. Sometimes, however, Congress breaks free of such parochial concerns and enacts bills that serve the general public, not just special interest groups. In this important and original book, R. Douglas Arnold offers a theory that explains not only why special interests frequently triumph but also why the general public sometimes wins. By showing how legislative leaders build coalitions for both types of programs, he illuminates recent legislative decisions in such areas as economic, tax, and energy policy. Arnold's theory of policy making rests on a reinterpretation of the relationship between legislators' actions and their constituents' policy preferences. Most scholars explore the impact that citizens' existing policy preferences have on legislators' decisions. They ignore citizens who have no opinions because they assume that uninformed citizens cannot possibly affect legislators' choices. Arnold examines the influence of citizens' potential preferences, however, and argues that legislators also respond to these preferences in order to avoid future electoral problems. He shows how legislators estimate the political consequences of their voting decisions, taking into account both the existing preferences of attentive citizens and the potential preferences of inattentive citizens. He then analyzes how coalition leaders manipulate the legislative situation in order to make it attractive for legislators to support a general interest bill.
The War Powers Resolution
Author: Douglas A. Grant
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Executive power
Languages : en
Pages : 29
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Executive power
Languages : en
Pages : 29
Book Description
When Does Congress Exercise Its Constitutional War Powers?
The War Powers Resolution: Is It Time for a New Approach?
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 45
Book Description
The 1973 War Powers Resolution's purpose was to ensure Congress shared responsibility and accountability with the President in determining when to use the United States Armed Forces in hostilities. Unfortunately, the Resolution has not fulfilled the expectations of its sponsors and has served to divide American public opinion whenever a President has contemplated employing military forces in a crisis situation. Undermining the War Powers Resolution are the debates on whether the Resolution improperly intrudes on the President's Constitutional Commander-in-Chief powers and what constitutes proper consultation, and the constitutionality of the presidential reporting requirements and the mechanisms by which Congress can react to presidential initiatives. Presidents have not embraced the War Powers Resolution and Congress has failed to consistently demand Presidential compliance with its provisions. Congress and the President must devise a new legislative compact that provides a framework for legislative and executive action in crisis situations. This compact would permit the President to act in specific instances without prior Congressional approval, establish a formal consultation mechanism between the President and Congress both before and during a crisis, establish reporting requirements as a means to inform Congress, and require Congressional action to either support or request termination of the military action as soon as practicable.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 45
Book Description
The 1973 War Powers Resolution's purpose was to ensure Congress shared responsibility and accountability with the President in determining when to use the United States Armed Forces in hostilities. Unfortunately, the Resolution has not fulfilled the expectations of its sponsors and has served to divide American public opinion whenever a President has contemplated employing military forces in a crisis situation. Undermining the War Powers Resolution are the debates on whether the Resolution improperly intrudes on the President's Constitutional Commander-in-Chief powers and what constitutes proper consultation, and the constitutionality of the presidential reporting requirements and the mechanisms by which Congress can react to presidential initiatives. Presidents have not embraced the War Powers Resolution and Congress has failed to consistently demand Presidential compliance with its provisions. Congress and the President must devise a new legislative compact that provides a framework for legislative and executive action in crisis situations. This compact would permit the President to act in specific instances without prior Congressional approval, establish a formal consultation mechanism between the President and Congress both before and during a crisis, establish reporting requirements as a means to inform Congress, and require Congressional action to either support or request termination of the military action as soon as practicable.
The War Powers Resolution
Author: Raymond S. Eresman
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Executive power
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
The 1973 War Powers Resolution's purpose was to ensure Congress shared responsibility and accountability with the President in determining when to use the United States Armed Forces in hostilities. Unfortunately, the Resolution has not fulfilled the expectations of its sponsors and has served to divide American public opinion whenever a President has contemplated employing military forces in a crisis situation. Undermining the War Powers Resolution are the debates on whether the Resolution improperly intrudes on the President's Constitutional Commander-in-Chief powers and what constitutes proper consultation, and the constitutionality of the presidential reporting requirements and the mechanisms by which Congress can react to presidential initiatives. Presidents have not embraced the War Powers Resolution and Congress has failed to consistently demand Presidential compliance with its provisions. Congress and the President must devise a new legislative compact that provides a framework for legislative and executive action in crisis situations. This compact would permit the President to act in specific instances without prior Congressional approval, establish a formal consultation mechanism between the President and Congress both before and during a crisis, establish reporting requirements as a means to inform Congress, and require Congressional action to either support or request termination of the military action as soon as practicable.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Executive power
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
The 1973 War Powers Resolution's purpose was to ensure Congress shared responsibility and accountability with the President in determining when to use the United States Armed Forces in hostilities. Unfortunately, the Resolution has not fulfilled the expectations of its sponsors and has served to divide American public opinion whenever a President has contemplated employing military forces in a crisis situation. Undermining the War Powers Resolution are the debates on whether the Resolution improperly intrudes on the President's Constitutional Commander-in-Chief powers and what constitutes proper consultation, and the constitutionality of the presidential reporting requirements and the mechanisms by which Congress can react to presidential initiatives. Presidents have not embraced the War Powers Resolution and Congress has failed to consistently demand Presidential compliance with its provisions. Congress and the President must devise a new legislative compact that provides a framework for legislative and executive action in crisis situations. This compact would permit the President to act in specific instances without prior Congressional approval, establish a formal consultation mechanism between the President and Congress both before and during a crisis, establish reporting requirements as a means to inform Congress, and require Congressional action to either support or request termination of the military action as soon as practicable.
To Chain the Dog of War
Author: Francis Dunham Wormuth
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 368
Book Description
Originally published by Southern Methodist U. Press, 1986. Includes new material on recent events (Iran/Contra affair, invasion of Grenada) and on the current situation in Nicaragua, the Persian Gulf, and El Salvador. Cloth edition, $39.95. Annotation copyrighted by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 368
Book Description
Originally published by Southern Methodist U. Press, 1986. Includes new material on recent events (Iran/Contra affair, invasion of Grenada) and on the current situation in Nicaragua, the Persian Gulf, and El Salvador. Cloth edition, $39.95. Annotation copyrighted by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR
War Powers Resolution
Logic of Congressional Action
On War
Author: Carl von Clausewitz
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Military art and science
Languages : en
Pages : 388
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Military art and science
Languages : en
Pages : 388
Book Description