Author: Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: European Scrutiny Committee
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780215064639
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 140
Book Description
House of Commons - European Scrutiny Committee: Twenty-Second Report of Session 2013-14 - HC 83-xx
Author: Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: European Scrutiny Committee
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780215064639
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 140
Book Description
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780215064639
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 140
Book Description
Twenty-second Report of Session 2012-13
Author: Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: European Scrutiny Committee
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780215051011
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 114
Book Description
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780215051011
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 114
Book Description
HC 219-xxvii - Twenty-eighth Report of Session 2014-15
Author: Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. European Scrutiny Committee
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 0215081005
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 108
Book Description
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 0215081005
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 108
Book Description
House of Commons - European Scrutiny Committee: Twenty-eighth Report of Session 2013-14 - HC 83-xxv
Author: Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: European Scrutiny Committee
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780215065988
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 112
Book Description
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780215065988
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 112
Book Description
House of Commons - European scrutiny Committee: Twenty-seventh report of Session 2013-14 - HC 83-xxiv
Author: Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: European Scrutiny Committee
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780215065889
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 84
Book Description
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780215065889
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 84
Book Description
HC 219-xxviii Twenty-ninth Report of Session 2014-15
Author: Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. European Scrutiny Committee
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 0215081110
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 88
Book Description
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 0215081110
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 88
Book Description
HC 342-xiv - Fifteenth report of session 2015-16
Author: Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. European Scrutiny Committee
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 0215088182
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 134
Book Description
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 0215088182
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 134
Book Description
HC 219-xxxiii - Thirty-fourth Report of Session 2014-15
Author: Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. European Scrutiny Committee
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 0215083784
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 141
Book Description
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 0215083784
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 141
Book Description
The Role of the Charity Commission and Public Benefit
Author: Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Public Administration Select Committee
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780215058782
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 238
Book Description
This report into the implementation of the Charities Act 2006 finds the Charity Commission being asked to do too much, with too little. The charitable sector is at the heart of UK society, involving millions of people and £9.3 billion received in donations in 2011/2012. Around 25 new applications for charitable status are received by the Charity Commission every working day. Among the reports findings are: one of the keys tests set by the Charities Act 2006 for determining charitable status-the public benefit test-is critically flawed; the Government should revise the statutory objectives for the Charity Commission, to allow the Commission to focus its limited resources on regulating the sector; the proposal to increase the financial threshold for compulsory registration of a charity with the Charity Commission should be rejected; charities should publish their spending on campaigning and political activity. PASC criticises the way the Charity Commission has interpreted public benefit under the Act. The Committee also considered the impact of face-to-face fundraising, or "chugging"-on the street or on the doorstep-and warns that self-regulation has failed so far to generate the level of public confidence which is essential to maintain the reputation of the charitable sector. The evidence was clear that the regulation of fundraising remains a concern for many members of the public. Two in three people have reported feeling uncomfortable as a result of the fundraising methods used by some charities.
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780215058782
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 238
Book Description
This report into the implementation of the Charities Act 2006 finds the Charity Commission being asked to do too much, with too little. The charitable sector is at the heart of UK society, involving millions of people and £9.3 billion received in donations in 2011/2012. Around 25 new applications for charitable status are received by the Charity Commission every working day. Among the reports findings are: one of the keys tests set by the Charities Act 2006 for determining charitable status-the public benefit test-is critically flawed; the Government should revise the statutory objectives for the Charity Commission, to allow the Commission to focus its limited resources on regulating the sector; the proposal to increase the financial threshold for compulsory registration of a charity with the Charity Commission should be rejected; charities should publish their spending on campaigning and political activity. PASC criticises the way the Charity Commission has interpreted public benefit under the Act. The Committee also considered the impact of face-to-face fundraising, or "chugging"-on the street or on the doorstep-and warns that self-regulation has failed so far to generate the level of public confidence which is essential to maintain the reputation of the charitable sector. The evidence was clear that the regulation of fundraising remains a concern for many members of the public. Two in three people have reported feeling uncomfortable as a result of the fundraising methods used by some charities.
Public engagement in policy making
Author: Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Public Administration Select Committee
Publisher: Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780215058737
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 132
Book Description
In this report the Public Administration Select Committee (PASC) calls for a "wiki" approach to policy-making, where public opinion, ideas and contributions are sought and welcome at any and all stages of the policy cycle. The Government should be able to demonstrate that it has adopted this approach alongside ministerial leadership and responsibility for policy and its outcomes. All policy making carries risks: a lack of appetite for participation, disappointment arising from unrealistic expectations and the dominance of vested interests. Government must frankly assess and address these risks in relation to open policy making. Digital technology has a significant role to play in opening up policy-making. Government could and should go further and embrace radical and innovative approaches, making use of existing platforms and technologies, such as Twitter. The success and impact of public engagement in policy-making must be effectively measured. Government must able to demonstrate value for money and improved outcomes with this new approach, particularly in a time of austerity. The Committee says proposals for both "open" and "contestable" policy-making demonstrate that Government recognises the value of public opinion in helping to identify problems and develop solutions. However, for open policy-making to work, it must be a genuine departure from more traditional forms of policy-making, where public engagement has usually only occurred after the Government has already determined a course of action. Care must be taken to ensure that open policy-making processes are not dominated by vested interests or 'the usual suspects' who are aware of policy 'opportunities'.
Publisher: Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780215058737
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 132
Book Description
In this report the Public Administration Select Committee (PASC) calls for a "wiki" approach to policy-making, where public opinion, ideas and contributions are sought and welcome at any and all stages of the policy cycle. The Government should be able to demonstrate that it has adopted this approach alongside ministerial leadership and responsibility for policy and its outcomes. All policy making carries risks: a lack of appetite for participation, disappointment arising from unrealistic expectations and the dominance of vested interests. Government must frankly assess and address these risks in relation to open policy making. Digital technology has a significant role to play in opening up policy-making. Government could and should go further and embrace radical and innovative approaches, making use of existing platforms and technologies, such as Twitter. The success and impact of public engagement in policy-making must be effectively measured. Government must able to demonstrate value for money and improved outcomes with this new approach, particularly in a time of austerity. The Committee says proposals for both "open" and "contestable" policy-making demonstrate that Government recognises the value of public opinion in helping to identify problems and develop solutions. However, for open policy-making to work, it must be a genuine departure from more traditional forms of policy-making, where public engagement has usually only occurred after the Government has already determined a course of action. Care must be taken to ensure that open policy-making processes are not dominated by vested interests or 'the usual suspects' who are aware of policy 'opportunities'.