Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Ways and Means. Subcommittee on Trade
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 256
Book Description
Trade Diversion of Melons and Pineapples from the Caribbean Basin Under a North American Free Trade Agreement
Caribbean Basin Free Trade Agreements Act
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Ways and Means. Subcommittee on Trade
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 256
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 256
Book Description
Beyond the Northern American Free Trade Agreement
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs. Subcommittee on International Economic Policy and Trade
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 176
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 176
Book Description
North American Free Trade Agreement, Caribbean Basin Initiative, and Florida Agriculture
Caribbean Basin Countries
The Enterprise for the Americas Initiative and the North American Free Trade Agreement
Author: Yasmine Shamsie
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Free trade
Languages : en
Pages : 25
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Free trade
Languages : en
Pages : 25
Book Description
Free tade and US-Caribbean Basin Relations:TheSpecter of the North Ameerican.Free trade Agreement
Author: Emilio Pantojas-GarcĂa
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : es
Pages : 14
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : es
Pages : 14
Book Description
R.B.
Taking Advantage of a Pananma-U.S. Trade Agreement
Crs Report for Congress
Author: Congressional Research Service: The Libr
Publisher: BiblioGov
ISBN: 9781294246251
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 30
Book Description
On November 16, 2003, President George W. Bush formally notified Congress of his intention to negotiate a bilateral free trade agreement (FTA) with Panama. Negotiations commenced in April 2004 and concluded on December 19, 2006 at the close of the tenth round. As with all free trade agreements, the U.S.-Panama FTA enters into force only after the President signs into law implementing legislation passed by both Houses of Congress. Panama is a small U.S. trade partner, but benefits from significant U.S. investment and unilateral trade preferences (the Caribbean Basin Initiative and some that require congressional renewal -- the Caribbean Basin Trade Partnership Act and the Generalized System of Preferences). These preferences would be replaced and made permanent by the reciprocal FTA. The FTA had to reconcile the requirements of a relatively small developing country with those of a large developed one. For Panama, this meant addressing multiple trade liberalization goals, including expanding its globally competitive services sector, repositioning its much smaller manufacturing sector, and easing slowly into the international market its more protected and less competitive agricultural sector. For the United States, it meant building on a long-standing strategic military and commercial relationship, while accommodating the concerns of sensitive domestic ...
Publisher: BiblioGov
ISBN: 9781294246251
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 30
Book Description
On November 16, 2003, President George W. Bush formally notified Congress of his intention to negotiate a bilateral free trade agreement (FTA) with Panama. Negotiations commenced in April 2004 and concluded on December 19, 2006 at the close of the tenth round. As with all free trade agreements, the U.S.-Panama FTA enters into force only after the President signs into law implementing legislation passed by both Houses of Congress. Panama is a small U.S. trade partner, but benefits from significant U.S. investment and unilateral trade preferences (the Caribbean Basin Initiative and some that require congressional renewal -- the Caribbean Basin Trade Partnership Act and the Generalized System of Preferences). These preferences would be replaced and made permanent by the reciprocal FTA. The FTA had to reconcile the requirements of a relatively small developing country with those of a large developed one. For Panama, this meant addressing multiple trade liberalization goals, including expanding its globally competitive services sector, repositioning its much smaller manufacturing sector, and easing slowly into the international market its more protected and less competitive agricultural sector. For the United States, it meant building on a long-standing strategic military and commercial relationship, while accommodating the concerns of sensitive domestic ...