Higher Education Opportunity Act PDF Download

Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Higher Education Opportunity Act PDF full book. Access full book title Higher Education Opportunity Act by United States. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.

Higher Education Opportunity Act

Higher Education Opportunity Act PDF Author: United States
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education, Higher
Languages : en
Pages : 432

Book Description


Higher Education Opportunity Act

Higher Education Opportunity Act PDF Author: United States
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education, Higher
Languages : en
Pages : 432

Book Description


The Senate Intelligence Committee Report on Torture (Academic Edition)

The Senate Intelligence Committee Report on Torture (Academic Edition) PDF Author: Senate Select Committee On Intelligence
Publisher: Melville House
ISBN: 1612198473
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 820

Book Description
The study edition of book the Los Angeles Times called, "The most extensive review of U.S. intelligence-gathering tactics in generations." This is the complete Executive Summary of the Senate Intelligence Committee's investigation into the CIA's interrogation and detention programs -- a.k.a., The Torture Report. Based on over six million pages of secret CIA documents, the report details a covert program of secret prisons, prisoner deaths, interrogation practices, and cooperation with other foreign and domestic agencies, as well as the CIA's efforts to hide the details of the program from the White House, the Department of Justice, the Congress, and the American people. Over five years in the making, it is presented here exactly as redacted and released by the United States government on December 9, 2014, with an introduction by Daniel J. Jones, who led the Senate investigation. This special edition includes: • Large, easy-to-read format. • Almost 3,000 notes formatted as footnotes, exactly as they appeared in the original report. This allows readers to see obscured or clarifying details as they read the main text. • An introduction by Senate staffer Daniel J. Jones who led the investigation and wrote the report for the Senate Intelligence Committee, and a forward by the head of that committee, Senator Dianne Feinstein.

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 PDF Author: United States
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Four Confederated Bands of Pawnees
Languages : en
Pages : 450

Book Description


Economics

Economics PDF Author: United States. Superintendent of Documents
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 112

Book Description


Treaties Submitted to the Senate

Treaties Submitted to the Senate PDF Author: United States. Department of State
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : United States
Languages : en
Pages : 22

Book Description


Records of the Constitutional Convention of 1787

Records of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Documents on microfilm
Languages : en
Pages : 16

Book Description


The Encyclopedia of the United States Congress

The Encyclopedia of the United States Congress PDF Author: Donald C. Bacon
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 606

Book Description


Records, Computers, and the Rights of Citizens

Records, Computers, and the Rights of Citizens PDF Author: United States. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Secretary's Advisory Committee on Automated Personal Data Systems
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business records
Languages : en
Pages : 396

Book Description


Free Speech and the Regulation of Social Media Content

Free Speech and the Regulation of Social Media Content PDF Author: Valerie C. Brannon
Publisher: Independently Published
ISBN: 9781092635158
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 50

Book Description
As the Supreme Court has recognized, social media sites like Facebook and Twitter have become important venues for users to exercise free speech rights protected under the First Amendment. Commentators and legislators, however, have questioned whether these social media platforms are living up to their reputation as digital public forums. Some have expressed concern that these sites are not doing enough to counter violent or false speech. At the same time, many argue that the platforms are unfairly banning and restricting access to potentially valuable speech. Currently, federal law does not offer much recourse for social media users who seek to challenge a social media provider's decision about whether and how to present a user's content. Lawsuits predicated on these sites' decisions to host or remove content have been largely unsuccessful, facing at least two significant barriers under existing federal law. First, while individuals have sometimes alleged that these companies violated their free speech rights by discriminating against users' content, courts have held that the First Amendment, which provides protection against state action, is not implicated by the actions of these private companies. Second, courts have concluded that many non-constitutional claims are barred by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, 47 U.S.C. § 230, which provides immunity to providers of interactive computer services, including social media providers, both for certain decisions to host content created by others and for actions taken "voluntarily" and "in good faith" to restrict access to "objectionable" material. Some have argued that Congress should step in to regulate social media sites. Government action regulating internet content would constitute state action that may implicate the First Amendment. In particular, social media providers may argue that government regulations impermissibly infringe on the providers' own constitutional free speech rights. Legal commentators have argued that when social media platforms decide whether and how to post users' content, these publication decisions are themselves protected under the First Amendment. There are few court decisions evaluating whether a social media site, by virtue of publishing, organizing, or even editing protected speech, is itself exercising free speech rights. Consequently, commentators have largely analyzed the question of whether the First Amendment protects a social media site's publication decisions by analogy to other types of First Amendment cases. There are at least three possible frameworks for analyzing governmental restrictions on social media sites' ability to moderate user content. Which of these three frameworks applies will depend largely on the particular action being regulated. Under existing law, social media platforms may be more likely to receive First Amendment protection when they exercise more editorial discretion in presenting user-generated content, rather than if they neutrally transmit all such content. In addition, certain types of speech receive less protection under the First Amendment. Courts may be more likely to uphold regulations targeting certain disfavored categories of speech such as obscenity or speech inciting violence. Finally, if a law targets a social media site's conduct rather than speech, it may not trigger the protections of the First Amendment at all.

Summary of Enactments

Summary of Enactments PDF Author: Ohio. General Assembly. Legislative Service Commission
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Legislation
Languages : en
Pages : 208

Book Description