The Use of Nitrogen Timing and Nitrification Inhibitors as Tools in Corn and Wheat Production in Kansas PDF Download

Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download The Use of Nitrogen Timing and Nitrification Inhibitors as Tools in Corn and Wheat Production in Kansas PDF full book. Access full book title The Use of Nitrogen Timing and Nitrification Inhibitors as Tools in Corn and Wheat Production in Kansas by Timothy J. Foster. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.

The Use of Nitrogen Timing and Nitrification Inhibitors as Tools in Corn and Wheat Production in Kansas

The Use of Nitrogen Timing and Nitrification Inhibitors as Tools in Corn and Wheat Production in Kansas PDF Author: Timothy J. Foster
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Book Description
World population, together with the cost of crop production inputs, is increasing rapidly. The current seven billion people on earth are expected to reach nine billion by 2050 with resulting demands on world food production. In addition, the quality of our environment is being impacted by human activities, including agricultural production and crop fertilization. Nitrogen (N) management is the process of applying N fertilizers in a way to maximize use of N by crops, while minimizing loss to the environment. It is becoming imperative, as a means of increasing crop yields and food supplies, while reducing input usage, and minimizing the impact of N fertilization on the quality of our environment, that improved N application practices be identified and utilized. The objectives for this study were to compare the timing of anhydrous ammonia (AA) fertilizer N applications, fall and spring, with and without two different nitrification inhibitors (NI) as possible tools to enhance yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) in corn (Zea mays) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Kansas. Two different nitrification inhibitors were tested as alternatives, N-Serve (nitrapyrin) produced and marketed by Dow AgroSciences, and an experimental product under development by Koch Agronomic Services LLC. Three differing rates of the experimental product were used to assist in determining the optimal rate for this product. The study was conducted over two growing seasons, 2012 and 2013, which differed significantly in rainfall, rainfall distribution, and resulting NUE. Experiments were established at three sites for both crops in both years, on sites/soils selected for differing potentials for N loss, and mechanisms of N loss. One site was established at the Kansas State University Agronomy North Farm (N Farm), where yield potential was high, and N loss potential was low. A second site was established under irrigation at the Kansas River Valley Experiment Field near Topeka, KS (KRV), on a coarse silt loam soil with high potential for N loss through leaching. The third site was established at the East Central Kansas Experiment Field near Ottawa KS (ECK), on a clay pan soil with a high potential for denitrification loss. Weather conditions together with soil characteristics played a major role in the performance of N timing applications and impacted the response to the use of the inhibitors. In low N loss environments such as the N Farm, fall applications of AA to increase spring time-availability for producers showed minimal negative effects on yield or NUE. When combined with a nitrification inhibitor in the fall, performance was similar to spring application for both corn and wheat. At the KRV site leaching loss or potential loss from fall application was high for corn and wheat in both years, however little impact on NUE with NI use was observed. At the high ECK denitrification site, there was only one N loss potential event leading to inhibitor performance at Ottawa in corn in 2013.

The Use of Nitrogen Timing and Nitrification Inhibitors as Tools in Corn and Wheat Production in Kansas

The Use of Nitrogen Timing and Nitrification Inhibitors as Tools in Corn and Wheat Production in Kansas PDF Author: Timothy J. Foster
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Book Description
World population, together with the cost of crop production inputs, is increasing rapidly. The current seven billion people on earth are expected to reach nine billion by 2050 with resulting demands on world food production. In addition, the quality of our environment is being impacted by human activities, including agricultural production and crop fertilization. Nitrogen (N) management is the process of applying N fertilizers in a way to maximize use of N by crops, while minimizing loss to the environment. It is becoming imperative, as a means of increasing crop yields and food supplies, while reducing input usage, and minimizing the impact of N fertilization on the quality of our environment, that improved N application practices be identified and utilized. The objectives for this study were to compare the timing of anhydrous ammonia (AA) fertilizer N applications, fall and spring, with and without two different nitrification inhibitors (NI) as possible tools to enhance yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) in corn (Zea mays) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Kansas. Two different nitrification inhibitors were tested as alternatives, N-Serve (nitrapyrin) produced and marketed by Dow AgroSciences, and an experimental product under development by Koch Agronomic Services LLC. Three differing rates of the experimental product were used to assist in determining the optimal rate for this product. The study was conducted over two growing seasons, 2012 and 2013, which differed significantly in rainfall, rainfall distribution, and resulting NUE. Experiments were established at three sites for both crops in both years, on sites/soils selected for differing potentials for N loss, and mechanisms of N loss. One site was established at the Kansas State University Agronomy North Farm (N Farm), where yield potential was high, and N loss potential was low. A second site was established under irrigation at the Kansas River Valley Experiment Field near Topeka, KS (KRV), on a coarse silt loam soil with high potential for N loss through leaching. The third site was established at the East Central Kansas Experiment Field near Ottawa KS (ECK), on a clay pan soil with a high potential for denitrification loss. Weather conditions together with soil characteristics played a major role in the performance of N timing applications and impacted the response to the use of the inhibitors. In low N loss environments such as the N Farm, fall applications of AA to increase spring time-availability for producers showed minimal negative effects on yield or NUE. When combined with a nitrification inhibitor in the fall, performance was similar to spring application for both corn and wheat. At the KRV site leaching loss or potential loss from fall application was high for corn and wheat in both years, however little impact on NUE with NI use was observed. At the high ECK denitrification site, there was only one N loss potential event leading to inhibitor performance at Ottawa in corn in 2013.

Impact of Nitrification Inhibitor Use on Corn Yield and Soil Nitrogen Levels from Liquid Hog Manure Applied at Various Fall Timings

Impact of Nitrification Inhibitor Use on Corn Yield and Soil Nitrogen Levels from Liquid Hog Manure Applied at Various Fall Timings PDF Author: Kathryn Jackson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Book Description
Manure applied in early with warmer temperatures can have higher nitrification rates and nitrogen loss potential, but waiting for cooler conditions in later fall risks an early winter conditions that may prevent application. Nitrate is susceptible to leaching and denitrification, which potentially could be minimized by including a nitrification inhibitor (NI) when applying manure. In this three-year study on corn, nitrapyrin was incorporated into liquid hog manure and applied at various fall timings and in spring. Soil samples were collected in the preceding fall, spring, and post-harvest, and plant nitrogen content, grain and stover were measured in the growing season. The seasonal manure application timing had a greater impact on plant responses than including the inhibitor, with spring manure applications having greater yields. It was found that there was an optimal window in November where fall-applied manure treatments had an economic benefit to being applied with a nitrification inhibitor.

Situation 78

Situation 78 PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Fertilizer industry
Languages : en
Pages : 88

Book Description
Policy; Energy; Technology; Marketing.

Nitrification Inhibitors and Use in Minnesota

Nitrification Inhibitors and Use in Minnesota PDF Author: Michael Schmitt
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 12

Book Description


Nitrification Inhibitors, Leaching, and Time of Nitrogen Application for Corn

Nitrification Inhibitors, Leaching, and Time of Nitrogen Application for Corn PDF Author: Tom D. Hughes
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 214

Book Description


Water Management, Consumptive Use, and Nitrogen Fertilization of Irrigated Winter Wheat in Western Kansas

Water Management, Consumptive Use, and Nitrogen Fertilization of Irrigated Winter Wheat in Western Kansas PDF Author: Jack T. Musick
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Wheat
Languages : en
Pages : 40

Book Description


Bulletin

Bulletin PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 712

Book Description


Evaluation of Nitrogen Loss Inhibitors for Corn and Wheat Production

Evaluation of Nitrogen Loss Inhibitors for Corn and Wheat Production PDF Author: Kevin Francis Bronson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Corn
Languages : en
Pages : 214

Book Description


Nitrification Inhibitor, Nitrogen Source, and Herbicide Effects on Soil Bitrogen Transformations and Corn Yield

Nitrification Inhibitor, Nitrogen Source, and Herbicide Effects on Soil Bitrogen Transformations and Corn Yield PDF Author: William Neels
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Book Description
Nitrogen is the most limiting nutrient for crop production; however, its management has been challenging due to increasing nitrogen losses. Increased N losses have led researchers to focus on strategies for improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE). In this study, we took an integrated approach to compare the effects of N source, nitrification inhibitor and herbicide on nitrification, N loss, crop yield, residual N, and NUE. We first evaluated these factors in a twoyear field experiment. A laboratory soil incubation experiment followed. The treatments included a combination of nitrification inhibitor vs. no inhibitor, two nitrogen fertilizer sources (broadcast urea vs. injected aqueous ammonia), and a pre-emergence herbicide vs. no herbicide. Results indicated that nitrogen source has a more significant effect on NH4 + -N retention (78-80% higher in anhydrous ammonia vs. urea) than nitrification inhibitor (24-47% higher with inhibitor vs. without inhibitor) and herbicides. Similarly, nitrogen source significantly affected NO3 - -N formation (134-176% lower in anhydrous ammonia vs. urea) than nitrification inhibitor (8-31% lower with inhibitor vs. without inhibitor) and herbicides. We then evaluated the effect of nitrification inhibitor, nitrogen fertilizer source, and herbicide on (1) soil nitrification through a 25 day-soil incubation and (2) NH3 volatilization, NO3 - -N leaching, and N2O emissions through a 31-day soil column study using a loamy sand soil. Results indicated that nitrogen source had a greater effect on reducing nitrification (32.5% lower with injected aqueous ammonia vs. surface broadcast urea) compared to nitrification inhibitors (4% lower with inhibitor vs. without inhibitor) and herbicide (no effect). Surface broadest urea increased NH3 volatilization by 673% compared to injected aqueous ammonia. Injected aqueous ammonia had 22% higher NO3 - -N leaching and 33 % higher NH4 + -N leaching than urea, while nitrification inhibitor had an inconsistent effect on NO3 - -N leaching across both N sources. The results of both experiments indicated that nitrogen source plays a more significant role in regulating soil nitrogen losses than nitrification inhibitors and herbicide..

Effects of Nitrification Inhibitors and N Fertilizer Placement on Corn Yield and Soil Nitrogen

Effects of Nitrification Inhibitors and N Fertilizer Placement on Corn Yield and Soil Nitrogen PDF Author: Edward H. Earles
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Corn
Languages : en
Pages : 242

Book Description