The Unpublished Opinions of Mr. Justice Brandeis PDF Download

Author: Louis Dembitz Brandeis
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judicial opinions
Languages : en
Pages : 324

View

Book Description

Author: Louis Dembitz Brandeis
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judicial opinions
Languages : en
Pages : 278

View

Book Description

Author: Louis D. Brandeis
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780758125385
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 278

View

Book Description

Author: Alexander Mordecai BICKEL
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description

Author: Louis Dembitz Brandeis
Publisher: Chicago : University of Chicago Press
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 326

View

Book Description

Author: Louis Dembitz Brandeis
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judicial opinions
Languages : en
Pages : 10

View

Book Description

Author: the late Bernard Schwartz
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0195365208
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 483

View

Book Description
An important contribution to constitutional literature, this collection of ten unpublished decisions by the Warren Court puts the decision making process of the Supreme Court in a new light. By following the major changes that occur in each case from the circulation of tentative majority opinions to the final issuance of opinion, the book portrays how the justices communicate with each other and how they are influenced by each other's arguments. Interpretations and commentaries by the author illuminate the significance of each case and provide insight into the different judicial philosophies and personal styles of the justices. This book will be of substantial value to law schools, law libraries, bar associations, and lawyers practicing in the field of constitutional law.

Author: Bernard Schwartz
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
ISBN: 0195035631
Category : Judicial opinions
Languages : en
Pages : 483

View

Book Description
An important contribution to constitutional literature, this collection of ten unpublished decisions by the Warren Court puts the decision making process of the Supreme Court in a new light. By following the major changes that occur in each case from the circulation of tentative majority opinions to the final issuance of opinion, the book portrays how the justices communicate with each other and how they are influenced by each other's arguments. Interpretations and commentaries by the author illuminate the significance of each case and provide insight into the different judicial philosophies and personal styles of the justices. This book will be of substantial value to law schools, law libraries, bar associations, and lawyers practicing in the field of constitutional law.

Author: David M. O'Brien
Publisher: University Press of Kansas
ISBN: 0700625186
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 232

View

Book Description
Brown v. Board of Education is widely recognized as one of the US Supreme Court's most important decisions in the twentieth century. Robert H. Jackson, an associate justice on the case, is generally considered one of the Court's most gifted writers. Though much has been written about Brown, citing the writing and remarks of the justices who participated in the 1954 decision, comparatively little has been said about Jackson or his unpublished opinion, which is sometimes even mistakenly taken as a dissenting opinion. This book visits Brown v. Board of Education from Jackson's perspective and, in doing so, offers a reinterpretation of the justice's thinking, and of the Supreme Court's decision making, in a ruling that continues to reverberate through the nation's politics and public life. Weaving together judicial biography, legal history, and judicial politics, Justice Robert H. Jackson's Unpublished Opinion in Brown v. Board provides a nuanced look at constitutional interpretation, and the intersection of law and politics, from inside the mind of a justice, within the context of a Court deciding a seminal case. Through an analysis of six drafts of Jackson's unpublished concurring opinion, David M. O'Brien explores the justice's evolving thoughts on relevant issues at critical moments in the case. His retelling of Brown presents a new view of longstanding arguments confronted by Jackson and the other justices over “original intent” versus a “living Constitution,” the role of the Court, and social change and justice in American political life. The book includes the final draft of Jackson's unpublished opinion, as well as the Warren Court's opinions in Brown and in Bolling v. Sharpe, for comparison, along with a timeline of developments and decision making leading to the Court's landmark ruling.

Author: David J. Danelski
Publisher: University of Michigan Press
ISBN: 0472119915
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 465

View

Book Description
Scholars use the most advanced methods in judicial studies to examine the role of Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court