The Philosophy of Animal Rights PDF Download

Author: Mylan Engel
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781590561775
Category : Nature
Languages : en
Pages : 129

View

Book Description
"Including course syllabus: Humans and other animals by Kathie Jenni; course syllabus: Environmental ethics by Mylan Engel, Jr."

Author: Roger Scruton
Publisher: A&C Black
ISBN: 9780826494047
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 226

View

Book Description
In this acclaimed book, Scruton takes the issues relating to vivisection, hunting, animal testing and BSE and places them in a wider framework of thought and feeling. Now available in paperback

Author: Tom Regan
Publisher: Univ of California Press
ISBN: 9780520054608
Category : Nature
Languages : en
Pages : 452

View

Book Description
THE argument for animal rights, a classic since its appearance in 1983, from the moral philosophical point of view. With a new preface.

Author: Julian H. Franklin
Publisher: Columbia University Press
ISBN: 9780231134224
Category : Animal rights
Languages : en
Pages : 188

View

Book Description
This theoretically rigorous text examines all the major arguments for animal rights in order to develop an ethical system that includes humans and animals.

Author: Tom Regan
Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
ISBN: 0742599388
Category : Nature
Languages : en
Pages : 155

View

Book Description
Regan provides the theoretical framework that grounds a responsible pro-animal rights perspective, and ultimately explores how asking moral questions about other animals can lead to a better understanding of ourselves.

Author: Gary L. Francione
Publisher: Columbia University Press
ISBN: 0231526695
Category : Nature
Languages : en
Pages : 289

View

Book Description
Gary L. Francione is a law professor and leading philosopher of animal rights theory. Robert Garner is a political theorist specializing in the philosophy and politics of animal protection. Francione maintains that we have no moral justification for using nonhumans and argues that because animals are property or economic commodities laws or industry practices requiring "humane" treatment will, as a general matter, fail to provide any meaningful level of protection. Garner favors a version of animal rights that focuses on eliminating animal suffering and adopts a protectionist approach, maintaining that although the traditional animal-welfare ethic is philosophically flawed, it can contribute strategically to the achievement of animal-rights ends. As they spar, Francione and Garner deconstruct the animal protection movement in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe, and elsewhere, discussing the practices of such organizations as PETA, which joins with McDonald's and other animal users to "improve" the slaughter of animals. They also examine American and European laws and campaigns from both the rights and welfare perspectives, identifying weaknesses and strengths that give shape to future legislation and action.

Author: Mark Rowlands
Publisher: MIT Press
ISBN: 0262380307
Category : Nature
Languages : en
Pages : 0

View

Book Description
A fresh view of animals and what we owe them. Do animals have moral standing? Do they count, morally speaking? In Animal Rights, Mark Rowlands argues that they do and explores the implications of this idea. He identifies three different waves in animal rights writing. The first wave was defined by a traditional dispute between utilitarianism (represented by Peter Singer) and rights-based approaches (represented by Tom Regan) to ethics. The second wave was defined by an expansion in a conception of ethics, which saw utilitarian and rights-based approaches supplemented by other ethical traditions, including contractualism, virtue ethics, and care ethics. The third wave was defined by an expansion in our conception of animals, driven by exciting new developments in the field of comparative psychology. Each of these waves had ramifications for how we understand the moral status of animals, but, this book argues, and reinforces, the core idea that animals deserve moral respect. In earlier waves, discussions of animal ethics had been focused on the issue of animal suffering. But the third wave is defined by the idea that animals are far more than merely sufferers or enjoyers of experiences but are instead authors of their own lives: creatures capable of choosing how to live, shaped by a conception of their life and how they would like it to go. Rowlands writes that, no matter what moral theory you choose, the most plausible version of that theory entails that animals have moral standing and that our obligations to them are far more substantial than many of us care to acknowledge.

Author: Robert Garner
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0199936315
Category : Nature
Languages : en
Pages : 206

View

Book Description
At the same time, he argues that humans have a greater interest in life and liberty than most species of nonhuman animals.

Author: David DeGrazia
Publisher: Oxford Paperbacks
ISBN: 9780192853608
Category : Medical
Languages : en
Pages : 152

View

Book Description
By presenting models for understanding animals' moral status and rights, and examining their mental lives and welfare, the author explores the implications for how we should treat animals in connection with our diet, zoos, and research.

Author: Carl Cohen
Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield
ISBN: 9780847696635
Category : Nature
Languages : en
Pages : 340

View

Book Description
Do all animals have rights? Is it morally wrong to use mice or dogs in medical research, or rabbits and cows as food? How ought we resolve conflicts between the interests of humans and those of other animals? Philosophical inquiry is essential in addressing such questions; the answers given must have enormous practical importance. Here for the first time in the same volume, the animal rights debate is argued deeply and fully by the two most articulate and influential philosophers representing the opposing camps. Each makes his case in turn to the opposing case. The arguments meet head on: Are we humans morally justified in using animals as we do? A vexed and enduring controversy here receives its deepest and most eloquent exposition.