The Nonlinear Association Between Abnormal Audit Fees and Audit Quality PDF Download

Author: Sui-kwong Alan Ho
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Auditing
Languages : en
Pages : 352

View

Book Description

Author: Ariel J. Markelevich
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 36

View

Book Description
Our study examines fees paid to auditors for audit and non-audit services during the period 2000 to 2003. We document a statistically significant positive association between audit fees and the absolute value of performance-adjusted discretionary accruals over all years. We also identify a significant positive association between non-audit fees and discretionary accruals in years 2000 and 2001, but no such association in later years (after passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act). This lack of association in 2002 and 2003 may be a result of legislation that limits the types of non-auditing services that auditors can provide to audit clients. To address the potential impact of fee composition and client importance on auditor independence, we extend our empirical analysis by incorporating predictions of abnormal audit and non-audit fees. We derive abnormal fees using a fee estimation model drawn from prior literature. We find evidence consistent with the view that clients with higher abnormal fees are more apt to exert influence on their auditors, which in turn may lead to a breach in auditor independence. Overall, our results are most consistent with economic bonding being the primary determinant of auditor behavior.

Author: Erik Beardsley
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 49

View

Book Description
This study examines the possibility of a nonlinear association between auditor-provided non-audit services (NAS) and audit quality. The effect of NAS on audit quality has been a long-standing debate among academics and regulators. One view is that NAS can potentially create economic bonding between the auditor and client, lowering audit quality. Another view is that NAS creates knowledge spillover, improving audit quality. Our unique approach provides evidence of a nonlinear association between NAS and audit quality, where client misstatement rates are higher for audit offices with both high and low levels of NAS. We also find a nonlinear association between NAS provision and both missed material weaknesses and meeting or beating analysts' consensus forecast by a small amount. This study should be of interest to audit firms, audit committees, and regulators because it advances our understanding of the effects of NAS on audit quality.

Author: Jong-Hag Choi
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 57

View

Book Description
Using a sample of 9,820 firm-year observations over the 2000-2003 period, this paper examines whether, and how, audit quality proxied by unsigned discretionary accruals is associated with the abnormal audit fee, i.e., the difference between actual audit fee and auditors' expectation on the normal level of fee. The results of various regressions reveal that the association between the two is insignificant for the full sample, significantly positive for the subsample of clients with positive abnormal fees, and insignificantly negative for the subsample of clients with negative abnormal fees. The above results suggest that auditors' incentives to compromise audit quality differ systematically depending on whether the clients pay more than or less than the normal level of audit fees, which in turn leads to the audit fee-audit quality association being conditioned on the sign of abnormal audit fees. Our results are robust to a battery of sensitivity checks. Relevant implications of our results to policy makers and academic researchers are discussed.

Author: 王旭升
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description

Author: Richard M. Frankel
Publisher: Forgotten Books
ISBN: 9780666794659
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 94

View

Book Description
Excerpt from The Relation Between Auditors' Fees for Non-Audit Services and Earnings Quality This paper provides empirical evidence on the relation between non-audit services and earnings quality. We test hypotheses concerning: (1) the association between a firm's purchase of non-audit services from its auditor and earnings management, and (2) the stock price reaction to the disclosure of non-audit fees. In the past decade there has been a dramatic increase in the proportion of fee revenue auditors derive from non-audit services, yet we know little about how non-audit services are related to earnings quality.1 Concern about the effect of non-audit services on the financial reporting process was a primary motivation for the Securities and Exchange Commission (sec) to issue revised auditor independence rules on November 15, 2000. The rules require firms to disclose the amount of all audit and non-audit fees paid to its auditor. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

Author: Patrick Krauss
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 37

View

Book Description
This study investigates the economic auditor-client dependency issue by examining the association between abnormal audit fee pricing and audit quality. Our study is the first to analyze this phenomenon empirically for the institutional setting of German IFRS firms by using a sample of 2,334 firm-year observations for the period from 2005 to 2010. Our empirical results demonstrate that positive abnormal audit fees are negatively associated with audit quality and imply that the audit fee premium is a significant indicator of compromised auditor independence due to economic auditor-client bonding. Audit fee discounts generally do not lead to a reduced audit effort, or respectively, audit quality is not impaired when client bar-gaining power is strong. The association of positive abnormal audit fees and audit quality is robust to different audit quality surrogates such as absolute discretionary accruals, financial restatements, and meeting or beating analysts' earnings forecasts.

Author: Jeffrey Coulton
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 67

View

Book Description
We provide evidence that distinguishes between competing production cost-based explanations of how to interpret unusually high (or low) audit fees and their expected relation with accounting quality. Abnormally high or low fees are typically proxied by the residuals obtained from fee models. Whereas prior research assumes these residuals are independent from one year to the next, we argue that the inherent “stickiness” in audit fee residuals also means that measures of unexpected fees will be serially correlated. Our results strongly support this view, and suggest that audit fee residuals reflect a limitation of the standard audit fee model in capturing attributes of the auditing environment that are not well captured at the client-firm level. However, we also argue that the extent to which residual fees differ from the recent past can clarify their relation to accounting quality. We show that the “jump” in fee residuals relative to their long-run “sticky” average is strongly associated with lower accounting quality. Hence, a “jump” in fee residuals is a suitable proxy for lower accounting quality, as it likely reflects reactive auditor effort and/or an additional risk premium. We then show that long-run fee residuals are also negatively associated with subsequent accounting quality, a result which further contradicts the argument that higher abnormal audit fees capture increased proactive effort and therefore reflect “investments in auditing”. Overall, our results suggest that risk, rather than proactive effort, is a better explanation for higher than expected audit production costs.

Author: Hongkang Xu
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781369061796
Category : Auditing
Languages : en
Pages : 104

View

Book Description
In the first essay, I divide the local audit market into the oligopolistic segment and atomistic segment and examine whether the differential effect of audit market concentration on audit fees, audit quality, and auditor switch in these two segments. I find that the market concentration raises the audit fees, but lowers the audit quality in the oligopolistic segment. In contrast, the market concentration lowers audit fees, but raises the audit quality in the atomistic segment. Moreover, I find that market concentration reduces the probability of auditor switch in both oligopolistic and atomistic segments. My findings reveal that audit market concentration only reduces the competition among oligopolistic segment. In contrast, the atomistic segment becomes more compressed and more competitive in a highly concentrated market. I also examine the nonlinear association between the auditor's market share and audit quality. I find that the relation between the market share and audit quality is an inverted U-curve. The second essay examines (1) the effect of real activities manipulation (RAM) on the audit report lags, (2) the impact of RAM on the audit fee and audit quality of industry experts, and (3) the linkages between accrual-based earnings management (AM), RAM, and audit fees. I find that RAM is associated with longer audit report lags. I also find that industry specialist auditor charge higher audit fees and make a more constraining influence on AM when their clients engage in aggressive RAM. However, I do not find that RAM affects the association between AM and audit fees.

Author: Bahaaeddin Alareeni
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description
This paper uses Meta-Analysis technique to a set of previous empirical studies to investigate the relation between audit firm characteristics (e.g. audit fees, audit firm size, non-audit services, auditor-client tenure) and audit quality. Hunter et al. (1982) test is used as the Meta-Analysis technique for this study. A total of 51 published papers are gathered from 1992 to 2016. The findings show that there is a significant positive relationship between auditor-client tenure, audit fees and audit quality, whereas non-audit services and audit firm size have a significant negative relationship with the audit quality.