The Nation's Report Card Reading 2013 Trial Urban District Snapshot Report. District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS). Grade 4, Public Schools PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download The Nation's Report Card Reading 2013 Trial Urban District Snapshot Report. District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS). Grade 4, Public Schools PDF full book. Access full book title The Nation's Report Card Reading 2013 Trial Urban District Snapshot Report. District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS). Grade 4, Public Schools by National Center for Education Statistics (ED). Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of fourth-grade students in the District of Columbia was 206. This was lower than the average score of 212 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in the District of Columbia in 2013 (206) was higher than their average score in 2011 (201) and in 2002 (191). The score gap between higher performing students in the District of Columbia (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 61 points in 2013. This performance gap was wider than that in 2002 (48 points). The percentage of students in the District of Columbia who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 25 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (20 percent) and in 2002 (10 percent). The percentage of students in the District of Columbia who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 49 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (44 percent) and in 2002 (31 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of fourth-grade students in the District of Columbia was 206. This was lower than the average score of 212 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in the District of Columbia in 2013 (206) was higher than their average score in 2011 (201) and in 2002 (191). The score gap between higher performing students in the District of Columbia (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 61 points in 2013. This performance gap was wider than that in 2002 (48 points). The percentage of students in the District of Columbia who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 25 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (20 percent) and in 2002 (10 percent). The percentage of students in the District of Columbia who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 49 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (44 percent) and in 2002 (31 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments.This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of eighth-grade students in the District of Columbia was 245. This was lower than the average score of 258 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in the District of Columbia in 2013 (245) was higher than their average score in 2011 (237) and in 2002 (240). The score gap between higher performing students in the District of Columbia (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 53 points in 2013. This performance gap was wider than that in 2002 (44 points). The percentage of students in the District of Columbia who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 18 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (15 percent) and was greater than that in 2002 (10 percent). The percentage of students in the District of Columbia who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 53 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (46 percent) and in 2002 (48 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of fourth-grade students in District of Columbia was 229. This was lower than the average score of 235 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in District of Columbia in 2013 (229) was higher than their average score in 2011 (222) and in 2003 (205). The score gap between higher performing students in District of Columbia (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 52 points in 2013. This performance gap was wider than that in 2003 (38 points). The percentage of students in District of Columbia who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 30 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (23 percent) and in 2003 (7 percent). The percentage of students in District of Columbia who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 64 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (59 percent) and in 2003 (36 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of eighth-grade students in the District of Columbia was 260. This was lower than the average score of 276 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in the District of Columbia in 2013 (260) was higher than their average score in 2011 (255) and in 2003 (243). The score gap between higher performing students in the District of Columbia (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 53 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2003 (48 points). The percentage of students in the District of Columbia who performed at or above the NAEP Proficient level was 17 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (15 percent) and was greater than that in 2003 (6 percent). The percentage of students in the District of Columbia who performed at or above the NAEP Basic level was 47 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (42 percent) and in 2003 (29 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author: Quinette Louw Publisher: AOSIS ISBN: 1928523862 Category : Medical Languages : en Pages : 536
Book Description
This scholarly book focuses on stroke in Africa. Stroke is a leading cause of disability among adults of all ages, contributing significantly to health care costs related to long term implications, particularly if rehabilitation is sub-optimal. Given the burden of stroke in Africa, there is a need for a book that focuses on functioning African stroke survivors and the implications for rehabilitation within the African context. In addition, there is a need to progress with contextualised, person-centred, evidence-based guidance for the rehabilitation of people with stroke in Africa, thereby enabling them to lead socially and economically meaningful lives. The research incorporated in the book used a range of primary and secondary methodological approaches (scoping reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, descriptive studies, surveys, health economics, and clinical practice guideline methodology) to shed new insights into African-centred issues and strategies to optimise function post-stroke.
Author: OECD Publisher: OECD Publishing ISBN: 9264201130 Category : Languages : en Pages : 334
Book Description
This second volume of PISA 2012 results defines and measures equity in education and analyses how equity in education has evolved across countries between PISA 2003 and 2012.
Author: United States. National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals Publisher: ISBN: Category : Police Languages : en Pages : 698
Author: G. Thomas Kingsley Publisher: Urban Institute Press ISBN: 9781442277045 Category : Political Science Languages : en Pages : 460
Book Description
Efforts to address the problems of distressed urban neighborhoods stretch back to the 1800s, but until relatively recently, data played little role in forming policy. It wasn't until the early 1990s that all of the factors necessary for rigorous, multifaceted analysis of neighborhood conditions--automated government records, geospatial information systems, and local organizations that could leverage both--converged. Strengthening Communities documents that convergence and details its progress, plotting the ways data are improving local governance in America.
Author: Suresh Chandra Satapathy Publisher: Springer ISBN: 9811317429 Category : Technology & Engineering Languages : en Pages : 745
Book Description
The book gathers papers addressing state-of-the-art research in all areas of Information and Communication Technologies and their applications in intelligent computing, cloud storage, data mining and software analysis. It presents the outcomes of the third International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Intelligent Systems, which was held on April 6–7, 2018, in Ahmedabad, India. Divided into two volumes, the book discusses the fundamentals of various data analytics and algorithms, making it a valuable resource for researchers’ future studies.
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: 
Author: Quinette Louw
Author: OECD
Author: United States. National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals
Author: G. Thomas Kingsley
Author: Suresh Chandra Satapathy