The Nation's Report Card Reading 2013 Trial Urban District Snapshot Report. Austin Independent School District. Grade 4, Public Schools PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download The Nation's Report Card Reading 2013 Trial Urban District Snapshot Report. Austin Independent School District. Grade 4, Public Schools PDF full book. Access full book title The Nation's Report Card Reading 2013 Trial Urban District Snapshot Report. Austin Independent School District. Grade 4, Public Schools by National Center for Education Statistics (ED). Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of fourth-grade students in Austin was 221. This was higher than the average score of 212 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Austin in 2013 (221) was not significantly different from their average score in 2011 (224) and was higher than their average score in 2005 (217). The score gap between higher performing students in Austin (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 54 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2005 (50 points). The percentage of students in Austin who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 36 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (36 percent) and was greater than that in 2005 (28 percent). The percentage of students in Austin who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 65 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (68 percent) and in 2005 (61 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of fourth-grade students in Austin was 221. This was higher than the average score of 212 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Austin in 2013 (221) was not significantly different from their average score in 2011 (224) and was higher than their average score in 2005 (217). The score gap between higher performing students in Austin (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 54 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2005 (50 points). The percentage of students in Austin who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 36 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (36 percent) and was greater than that in 2005 (28 percent). The percentage of students in Austin who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 65 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (68 percent) and in 2005 (61 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of eighth-grade students in Austin was 261. This was higher than the average score of 258 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Austin in 2013 (261) was not significantly different from their average score in 2011 (261) and in 2005 (257). The score gap between higher performing students in Austin (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 50 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2005 (52 points). The percentage of students in Austin who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 31 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (30 percent) and in 2005 (27 percent). The percentage of students in Austin who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 70 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (71 percent) and in 2005 (65 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of fourth-grade students in Austin was 245. This was higher than the average score of 235 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Austin in 2013 (245) was not significantly different from their average score in 2011 (245) and in 2005 (242). The score gap between higher performing students in Austin (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 41 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2005 (36 points). The percentage of students in Austin who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 46 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (46 percent) and was greater than that in 2005 (40 percent). The percentage of students in Austin who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 85 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (87 percent) and in 2005 (85 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of eighth-grade students in Austin was 285. This was higher than the average score of 276 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Austin in 2013 (285) was not significantly different from their average score in 2011 (287) and was higher than their average score in 2005 (281). The score gap between higher performing students in Austin (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 50 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2005 (53 points). The percentage of students in Austin who performed at or above the NAEP Proficient level was 35 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (38 percent) and in 2005 (33 percent). The percentage of students in Austin who performed at or above the NAEP Basic level was 73 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (74 percent) and was greater than that in 2005 (68 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author: David Whitman Publisher: ISBN: Category : Academic achievement Languages : en Pages : 390
Book Description
This book tells the story of six secondary schools that have succeeded in eliminating or dramatically shrinking the achievement gap between whites and disadvantaged black and Hispanic students. It recounts the stories of the University Park Campus School (UPCS) in Worcester, the American Indian Public Charter School in Oakland, Amistad Academy in New Haven, the Cristo Rey Jesuit High School in Chicago, the KIPP Academy in the Bronx, and the SEED school in Washington, D.C.
Author: Johnny Saldana Publisher: SAGE ISBN: 1446200124 Category : Reference Languages : en Pages : 282
Book Description
The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers is unique in providing, in one volume, an in-depth guide to each of the multiple approaches available for coding qualitative data. In total, 29 different approaches to coding are covered, ranging in complexity from beginner to advanced level and covering the full range of types of qualitative data from interview transcripts to field notes. For each approach profiled, Johnny Saldaña discusses the method’s origins in the professional literature, a description of the method, recommendations for practical applications, and a clearly illustrated example.
Author: Juanjo Mena Publisher: Springer Nature ISBN: 303079833X Category : Education Languages : en Pages : 300
Book Description
This book draws together various theoretical and research-based perspectives to examine the institutionalization of mentoring processes for beginning teachers. Teacher induction, defined as the guidance provided to new teachers, is increasingly gaining traction as a key stage in promoting quality education. Major efforts have been put into reducing transitional challenges from being a student teacher to a practicing teacher; optimizing professional relationships and socialization into school dynamics; and increasing teacher retention. Mentoring has been proven to add benefits in assisting beginning teachers during the early years of their teaching career, because it provides the required knowledge and skills to face uncertain school scenarios and the complexities of practice. However, teacher induction programs are not part of regular instruction in many countries. The lack of teacher training during the induction phase might result in lower levels of commitment, professional isolation, or even attrition. This book calls for more concrete mentoring processes for early career teachers, and questions how this can be put into practice.
Author: Chieri Uegaki Publisher: Kids Can Press Ltd ISBN: 1894786335 Category : Juvenile Fiction Languages : en Pages : 36
Book Description
Hana has signed up to play the violin at the talent show, even though sheÍs only had three lessons. Her brothers predict disaster. But Hana practices and practices, inspired by her grandfather, or Ojiichan, who played the violin every day when she visited him in Japan. As Hana takes the stage, doubt is all she can hear, until she recalls her grandfatherÍs words of encouragement, and shows the audience how beautiful music can take many forms.
Author: United States. National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals Publisher: ISBN: Category : Police Languages : en Pages : 698
Author: Daniel J. Losen Publisher: Teachers College Press ISBN: 0807773492 Category : Education Languages : en Pages : 286
Book Description
Educators remove over 3.45 million students from school annually for disciplinary reasons, despite strong evidence that school suspension policies are harmful to students. The research presented in this volume demonstrates that disciplinary policies and practices that schools control directly exacerbate today's profound inequities in educational opportunity and outcomes. Part I explores how suspensions flow along the lines of race, gender, and disability status. Part II examines potential remedies that show great promise, including a district-wide approach in Cleveland, Ohio, aimed at social and emotional learning strategies. Closing the School Discipline Gap is a call for action that focuses on an area in which public schools can and should make powerful improvements, in a relatively short period of time. Contributors include Robert Balfanz, Jamilia Blake, Dewey Cornell, Jeremy D. Finn, Thalia González, Anne Gregory, Daniel J. Losen, David M. Osher, Russell J. Skiba, Ivory A. Toldson “Closing the School Discipline Gap can make an enormous difference in reducing disciplinary exclusions across the country. This book not only exposes unsound practices and their disparate impact on the historically disadvantaged, but provides educators, policymakers, and community advocates with an array of remedies that are proven effective or hold great promise. Educators, communities, and students alike can benefit from the promising interventions and well-grounded recommendations.” —Linda Darling-Hammond, Charles E. Ducommun Professor of Education, Stanford University “For over four decades school discipline policies and practices in too many places have pushed children out of school, especially children of color. Closing the School Discipline Gap shows that adults have the power—and responsibility—to change school climates to better meet the needs of children. This volume is a call to action for policymakers, educators, parents, and students.” —Marian Wright Edelman, president, Children’s Defense Fund
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: David Whitman
Author: Johnny Saldana
Author: Juanjo Mena
Author: Chieri Uegaki
Author: United States. National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals
Author: Daniel J. Losen