The Nation's Report Card Mathematics 2013 Trial Urban District Snapshot Report. Chicago Public Schools. Grade 4, Public Schools PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download The Nation's Report Card Mathematics 2013 Trial Urban District Snapshot Report. Chicago Public Schools. Grade 4, Public Schools PDF full book. Access full book title The Nation's Report Card Mathematics 2013 Trial Urban District Snapshot Report. Chicago Public Schools. Grade 4, Public Schools by National Center for Education Statistics (ED). Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of fourth-grade students in Chicago was 231. This was lower than the average score of 235 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Chicago in 2013 (231) was higher than their average score in 2011 (224) and in 2003 (214). The score gap between higher performing students in Chicago (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 43 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2003 (36 points). The percentage of students in Chicago who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 28 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (20 percent) and in 2003 (10 percent). The percentage of students in Chicago who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 70 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (64 percent) and in 2003 (50 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of fourth-grade students in Chicago was 231. This was lower than the average score of 235 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Chicago in 2013 (231) was higher than their average score in 2011 (224) and in 2003 (214). The score gap between higher performing students in Chicago (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 43 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2003 (36 points). The percentage of students in Chicago who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 28 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (20 percent) and in 2003 (10 percent). The percentage of students in Chicago who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 70 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (64 percent) and in 2003 (50 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of fourth-grade students in Chicago was 206. This was lower than the average score of 212 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Chicago in 2013 (206) was not significantly different from their average score in 2011 (203) and was higher than their average score in 2002 (193). The score gap between higher performing students in Chicago (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 51 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2002 (48 points). The percentage of students in Chicago who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 20 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (18 percent) and was greater than that in 2002 (11 percent). The percentage of students in Chicago who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 51 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (48 percent) and was greater than that in 2002 (34 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of fourth-grade students in Detroit was 204. This was lower than the average score of 235 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Detroit in 2013 (204) was not significantly different from their average score in 2011 (203) and in 2009 (200). The score gap between higher performing students in Detroit (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 35 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2009 (37 points). The percentage of students in Detroit who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 4 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (3 percent) and in 2009 (3 percent). The percentage of students in Detroit who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 35 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (34 percent) and in 2009 (31 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of fourth-grade students in Miami-Dade was 237. This was not significantly different from the average score of 235 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Miami-Dade in 2013 (237) was not significantly different from their average score in 2011 (236) and in 2009 (236). The score gap between higher performing students in Miami-Dade (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 36 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2009 (35 points). The percentage of students in Miami-Dade who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 34 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (33 percent) and in 2009 (33 percent). The percentage of students in Miami-Dade who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 81 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (79 percent) and in 2009 (81 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of fourth-grade students in Baltimore City was 223. This was lower than the average score of 235 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Baltimore City in 2013 (223) was not significantly different from their average score in 2011 (226) and in 2009 (222). The score gap between higher performing students in Baltimore City (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 40 points in 2013. This performance gap was wider than that in 2009 (32 points). The percentage of students in Baltimore City who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 19 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (17 percent) and was greater than that in 2009 (13 percent). The percentage of students in Baltimore City who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 62 percent in 2013. This percentage was smaller than that in 2011 (68 percent) and was not significantly different from that in 2009 (64 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of eighth-grade students in Chicago was 269. This was lower than the average score of 276 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Chicago in 2013 (269) was not significantly different from their average score in 2011 (270) and was higher than their average score in 2003 (254). The score gap between higher performing students in Chicago (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 48 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2003 (45 points). The percentage of students in Chicago who performed at or above the NAEP Proficient level was 20 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (20 percent) and was greater than that in 2003 (9 percent). The percentage of students in Chicago who performed at or above the NAEP Basic level was 57 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (60 percent) and was greater than that in 2003 (42 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of fourth-grade students in Atlanta was 233. This was not significantly different from the average score of 235 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Atlanta in 2013 (233) was higher than their average score in 2011 (228) and in 2003 (216). The score gap between higher performing students in Atlanta (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 45 points in 2013. This performance gap was wider than that in 2003 (39 points). The percentage of students in Atlanta who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 31 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (25 percent) and in 2003 (13 percent). The percentage of students in Atlanta who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 72 percent in 2013. This percentage was greater than that in 2011 (66 percent) and in 2003 (50 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of fourth-grade students in Hillsborough County was 243. This was higher than the average score of 235 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Hillsborough County in 2013 (243) was not significantly different from their average score in 2011 (243). The score gap between higher performing students in Hillsborough County (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 37 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2011 (37 points). The percentage of students in Hillsborough County who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 43 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (43 percent). The percentage of students in Hillsborough County who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 85 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (86 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of fourth-grade students in Fresno was 220. This was lower than the average score of 235 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Fresno in 2013 (220) was not significantly different from their average score in 2011 (218) and in 2009 (219). The score gap between higher performing students in Fresno (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 38 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2009 (38 points). The percentage of students in Fresno who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 15 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (15 percent) and in 2009 (14 percent). The percentage of students in Fresno who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 59 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (56 percent) and in 2009 (58 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), in partnership with the National Assessment Governing Board and the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS), created the Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) in 2002 to support the improvement of student achievement in the nation's large urban districts. NAEP TUDA results in mathematics and reading are based on representative samples of 1,100 to 2,300 public school students at grade 4 and 900 to 2,100 public school students at grade 8 in each participating urban district in 2013. Twenty-one urban districts participated in the 2013 assessments. This one-page report presents overall results, achievement-level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups in 2013, and score gaps for student groups. In 2013, the average score of fourth-grade students in Boston was 237. This was not significantly different from the average score of 235 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Boston in 2013 (237) was not significantly different from their average score in 2011 (237) and was higher than their average score in 2003 (220). The score gap between higher performing students in Boston (those at the 75th percentile) and lower performing students (those at the 25th percentile) was 37 points in 2013. This performance gap was not significantly different from that in 2003 (33 points). The percentage of students in Boston who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 34 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (33 percent) and was greater than that in 2003 (12 percent). The percentage of students in Boston who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 80 percent in 2013. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2011 (81 percent) and was greater than that in 2003 (59 percent). [For "The Nation's Report Card: A First Look--2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment. NCES 2014-466," see ED544551.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)