The Nation's Report Card Mathematics 2011 Trial Urban District Snapshot Report. New York City Department of Education. Grade 4, Public Schools PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download The Nation's Report Card Mathematics 2011 Trial Urban District Snapshot Report. New York City Department of Education. Grade 4, Public Schools PDF full book. Access full book title The Nation's Report Card Mathematics 2011 Trial Urban District Snapshot Report. New York City Department of Education. Grade 4, Public Schools by National Center for Education Statistics (ED). Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
This one-page report presents overall results, achievement level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups (school race, gender, and eligibility for National School Lunch Program) in 2011, and score gaps for student groups. In 2011, the average score of fourth-grade students in New York City was 234. This was not significantly different from the average score of 233 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in New York City in 2011 (234) was not significantly different from their average score in 2009 (237) and was higher than their average score in 2003 (226). In 2011, the score gap between students in New York City at the 75th percentile and students at the 25th percentile was 41 points. This performance gap was not significantly different from that of 2003 (38 points). The percentage of students in New York City who performed at or above the NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) "Proficient" level was 32 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (35 percent) and was greater than that in 2003 (21 percent). The percentage of students in New York City who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 76 percent in 2011. This percentage was smaller than that in 2009 (79 percent) and was greater than that in 2003 (67 percent). [For the main report, "The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2011. Trial Urban District Assessment Results at Grades 4 and 8. NCES 2012-452," see ED527170.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
This one-page report presents overall results, achievement level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups (school race, gender, and eligibility for National School Lunch Program) in 2011, and score gaps for student groups. In 2011, the average score of fourth-grade students in New York City was 234. This was not significantly different from the average score of 233 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in New York City in 2011 (234) was not significantly different from their average score in 2009 (237) and was higher than their average score in 2003 (226). In 2011, the score gap between students in New York City at the 75th percentile and students at the 25th percentile was 41 points. This performance gap was not significantly different from that of 2003 (38 points). The percentage of students in New York City who performed at or above the NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) "Proficient" level was 32 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (35 percent) and was greater than that in 2003 (21 percent). The percentage of students in New York City who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 76 percent in 2011. This percentage was smaller than that in 2009 (79 percent) and was greater than that in 2003 (67 percent). [For the main report, "The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2011. Trial Urban District Assessment Results at Grades 4 and 8. NCES 2012-452," see ED527170.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
This one-page report presents overall results, achievement level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups (school race, gender, and eligibility for National School Lunch Program) in 2011, and score gaps for student groups. In 2011, the average score of eighth-grade students in New York City was 272. This was not significantly different from the average score of 274 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in New York City in 2011 (272) was not significantly different from their average score in 2009 (273) and was higher than their average score in 2003 (266). In 2011, the score gap between students in New York City at the 75th percentile and students at the 25th percentile was 51 points. This performance gap was not significantly different from that of 2003 (52 points). The percentage of students in New York City who performed at or above the NAEP "Proficient" level was 24 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (26 percent) and in 2003 (20 percent). The percentage of students in New York City who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 59 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (60 percent) and was greater than that in 2003 (54 percent). [For the main report, "The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2011. Trial Urban District Assessment Results at Grades 4 and 8. NCES 2012-452," see ED527170.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
This one-page report presents overall results, achievement level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups (school race, gender, and eligibility for National School Lunch Program) in 2011, and score gaps for student groups. In 2011, the average score of fourth-grade students in New York City was 216. This was higher than the average score of 211 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in New York City in 2011 (216) was not significantly different from their average score in 2009 (217) and was higher than their average score in 2002 (206). In 2011, the score gap between students in New York City at the 75th percentile and students at the 25th percentile was 48 points. This performance gap was not significantly different from that of 2002 (48 points). The percentage of students in New York City who performed at or above the NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) "Proficient" level was 29 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (29 percent) and was greater than that in 2002 (19 percent). The percentage of students in New York City who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 61 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (62 percent) and was greater than that in 2002 (47 percent). [For the main report, "The Nation's Report Card: Reading 2011. Trial Urban District Assessment Results at Grades 4 and 8. NCES 2012-455," see ED527171.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
This one-page report presents overall results, achievement level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups (school race, gender, and eligibility for National School Lunch Program) in 2011, and score gaps for student groups. In 2011, the average score of fourth-grade students in Dallas was 233. This was not significantly different from the average score of 233 for public school students in large cities. The percentage of students in Dallas who performed at or above the NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) "Proficient" level was 25 percent in 2011. This percentage was smaller than large cities (30 percent). The percentage of students in Dallas who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 79 percent in 2011. This percentage was greater than large cities (74 percent). [For the main report, "The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2011. Trial Urban District Assessment Results at Grades 4 and 8. NCES 2012-452," see ED527170.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
This one-page report presents overall results, achievement level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups (school race, gender, and eligibility for National School Lunch Program) in 2011, and score gaps for student groups. In 2011, the average score of fourth-grade students in Philadelphia was 225. This was lower than the average score of 233 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Philadelphia in 2011 (225) was higher than their average score in 2009 (222). In 2011, the score gap between students in Philadelphia at the 75th percentile and students at the 25th percentile was 38 points. This performance gap was not significantly different from that of 2009 (37 points). The percentage of students in Philadelphia who performed at or above the NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) "Proficient" level was 20 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (16 percent). The percentage of students in Philadelphia who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 66 percent in 2011. This percentage was greater than that in 2009 (61 percent). [For the main report, "The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2011. Trial Urban District Assessment Results at Grades 4 and 8. NCES 2012-452," see ED527170.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
This one-page report presents overall results, achievement level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups (school race, gender, and eligibility for National School Lunch Program) in 2011, and score gaps for student groups. In 2011, the average score of fourth-grade students in Detroit was 203. This was lower than the average score of 233 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Detroit in 2011 (203) was not significantly different from their average score in 2009 (200). In 2011, the score gap between students in Detroit at the 75th percentile and students at the 25th percentile was 35 points. This performance gap was not significantly different from that of 2009 (37 points). The percentage of students in Detroit who performed at or above the NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) "Proficient" level was 3 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (3 percent). The percentage of students in Detroit who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 34 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (31 percent). [For the main report, "The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2011. Trial Urban District Assessment Results at Grades 4 and 8. NCES 2012-452," see ED527170.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
This one-page report presents overall results, achievement level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups (school race, gender, and eligibility for National School Lunch Program) in 2011, and score gaps for student groups. In 2011, the average score of fourth-grade students in Milwaukee was 220. This was lower than the average score of 233 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Milwaukee in 2011 (220) was not significantly different from their average score in 2009 (220). In 2011, the score gap between students in Milwaukee at the 75th percentile and students at the 25th percentile was 37 points. This performance gap was not significantly different from that of 2009 (38 points). The percentage of students in Milwaukee who performed at or above the NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) "Proficient" level was 14 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (15 percent). The percentage of students in Milwaukee who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 58 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (59 percent). [For the main report, "The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2011. Trial Urban District Assessment Results at Grades 4 and 8. NCES 2012-452," see ED527170.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
This one-page report presents overall results, achievement level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups (school race, gender, and eligibility for National School Lunch Program) in 2011, and score gaps for student groups. In 2011, the average score of fourth-grade students in Los Angeles was 223. This was lower than the average score of 233 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in Los Angeles in 2011 (223) was not significantly different from their average score in 2009 (222) and was higher than their average score in 2003 (216). In 2011, the score gap between students in Los Angeles at the 75th percentile and students at the 25th percentile was 41 points. This performance gap was not significantly different from that of 2003 (39 points). The percentage of students in Los Angeles who performed at or above the NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) "Proficient" level was 20 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (19 percent) and was greater than that in 2003 (13 percent). The percentage of students in Los Angeles who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 63 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (61 percent) and was greater than that in 2003 (52 percent). [For the main report, "The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2011. Trial Urban District Assessment Results at Grades 4 and 8. NCES 2012-452," see ED527170.].
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 1
Book Description
This one-page report presents overall results, achievement level percentages and average score results, scores at selected percentiles, average scores for district and large cities, results for student groups (school race, gender, and eligibility for National School Lunch Program) in 2011, and score gaps for student groups. In 2011, the average score of fourth-grade students in District of Columbia was 222. This was lower than the average score of 233 for public school students in large cities. The average score for students in District of Columbia in 2011 (222) was not significantly different from their average score in 2009 (220) and was higher than their average score in 2003 (205). In 2011, the score gap between students in District of Columbia at the 75th percentile and students at the 25th percentile was 50 points. This performance gap was wider than that of 2003 (38 points). The percentage of students in District of Columbia who performed at or above the NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) "Proficient" level was 23 percent in 2011. This percentage was greater than that in 2009 (19 percent) and in 2003 (7 percent). The percentage of students in District of Columbia who performed at or above the NAEP "Basic" level was 59 percent in 2011. This percentage was not significantly different from that in 2009 (57 percent) and was greater than that in 2003 (36 percent). [For the main report, "The Nation's Report Card: Mathematics 2011. Trial Urban District Assessment Results at Grades 4 and 8. NCES 2012-452," see ED527170.].
Author: Benjamin P. Bowser Publisher: SUNY Press ISBN: 1438475993 Category : Social Science Languages : en Pages : 454
Book Description
A comprehensive exploration of racial inequality in New York City since 1965. In the past, the study of racial inequality in New York City has usually had a narrow focus, examining particular social problems affecting ethnic-racial groups. In contrast, this book provides a comprehensive overview of racial inequality in the city’s economy, housing, and education sectors over the last half-century. A collection of original essays by some of New York’s most well-known and emerging urban experts, Racial Inequality in New York City since 1965 explores what city government has done and failed to do to address racial inequality. It examines the changes in circumstances of Asian, Latino, West Indian, and African American New Yorkers, outlining how theirs have either improved or deteriorated relative to their white counterparts. The contributors also analyze how practices and policies in policing, public housing, public health, and community services have maintained racial inequality and discuss how political participation can increase social capital among city residents in order to reduce racial inequality. The book concludes by offering a compendium of practical recommendations and actions that can be implemented to address racial inequality in the city. “This book provides a broad and up-to-date survey of social and demographic trends in New York City. Unlike many other works, it crosses policy arenas and is not shy in advocating community action.” — J. Phillip Thompson, New York City Deputy Mayor for Strategic Policy Initiatives
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: National Center for Education Statistics (ED)
Author: Benjamin P. Bowser