Author: Mary E. Brown
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780970717214
Category : Judges
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
The author was one of 22 New Hampshire State Senators who served as judges and jurors in the impeachment trial of New Hampshire Supreme Court Justice David Brock, in the year 2000. She has written this account to put the impeachment proceedings in a historical perspective, to seek out the truth and discover possible ways to avoid similar events in the future, and to express her own impressions of the event as well as the views of a wide variety of other participants. c. Book News Inc.
The Impeachment Trial of the New Hampshire Supreme Court Chief Justice
Author: Mary E. Brown
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780970717214
Category : Judges
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
The author was one of 22 New Hampshire State Senators who served as judges and jurors in the impeachment trial of New Hampshire Supreme Court Justice David Brock, in the year 2000. She has written this account to put the impeachment proceedings in a historical perspective, to seek out the truth and discover possible ways to avoid similar events in the future, and to express her own impressions of the event as well as the views of a wide variety of other participants. c. Book News Inc.
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780970717214
Category : Judges
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
The author was one of 22 New Hampshire State Senators who served as judges and jurors in the impeachment trial of New Hampshire Supreme Court Justice David Brock, in the year 2000. She has written this account to put the impeachment proceedings in a historical perspective, to seek out the truth and discover possible ways to avoid similar events in the future, and to express her own impressions of the event as well as the views of a wide variety of other participants. c. Book News Inc.
Impeachment of David A. Brock, Chief Justice of the New Hampshire Supreme Court
Author: New Hampshire. General Court. Senate
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judicial ethics
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Compilation of documents pertaining to the impeachment trial of Chief Justice David A. Brock, New Hampshire Supreme Court.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judicial ethics
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Compilation of documents pertaining to the impeachment trial of Chief Justice David A. Brock, New Hampshire Supreme Court.
The Impeachment of Chief Justice David Brock
Author: John Cerullo
Publisher: Lexington Books
ISBN: 1498565905
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 325
Book Description
At this juncture in American history, some of our most hard-fought state-level political struggles involve control of state supreme courts. New Hampshire witnessed one of the most dramatic of these, culminating in the impeachment of Chief Justice David Brock in 2000, but the issues raised by the case are hardly confined to New Hampshire. They involved the proper nature and operation of judicial independence within a “populist” civic culture that had long assumed the primacy of the legislative branch, extolled its “citizen legislators” over insulated and professionalized elites, and entrusted those legislators to properly supervise the judiciary. In the last few decades of the 20th Century, New Hampshire’s judiciary had been substantially reconfigured: constitutional amendments and other measures endorsed by the national judicial-modernization movement had secured for it a much higher level of independence and internal unification than it had historically enjoyed. However, a bipartisan body of legislators remained committed to the principle of legislative supremacy inscribed in the state constitution of 1784. The 1980s and 1990s witnessed a series of clashes over court administration, allegations of judicial corruption, and finally a bitter and protracted battle over Court decisions on educational funding. Chief Justice Brock publicly embodied the judicial branch's new status and assertiveness. When information came to light regarding some of his administrative actions on the high court, deepening antipathy toward him exploded into an impeachment crisis. The struggle over Brock’s conduct raised significant questionsabout the meaning and proper practice of impeachment itself as a feature of democratic governance. When articles of impeachment were voted by the House of Representatives, the state Senate faced the difficult task of establishing trial protocols that would balance thepolitical and juridical responsibilities devolved on them, simultaneously, by the state constitution.Having struck that balance, the trial they conducted would finally acquit Brock of all charges. Nevertheless, David Brock’s impeachment was a highly consequential ordeal that provided a needed catalyst for reforms intended to produce a productive recalibration of legislative-judicial relations.
Publisher: Lexington Books
ISBN: 1498565905
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 325
Book Description
At this juncture in American history, some of our most hard-fought state-level political struggles involve control of state supreme courts. New Hampshire witnessed one of the most dramatic of these, culminating in the impeachment of Chief Justice David Brock in 2000, but the issues raised by the case are hardly confined to New Hampshire. They involved the proper nature and operation of judicial independence within a “populist” civic culture that had long assumed the primacy of the legislative branch, extolled its “citizen legislators” over insulated and professionalized elites, and entrusted those legislators to properly supervise the judiciary. In the last few decades of the 20th Century, New Hampshire’s judiciary had been substantially reconfigured: constitutional amendments and other measures endorsed by the national judicial-modernization movement had secured for it a much higher level of independence and internal unification than it had historically enjoyed. However, a bipartisan body of legislators remained committed to the principle of legislative supremacy inscribed in the state constitution of 1784. The 1980s and 1990s witnessed a series of clashes over court administration, allegations of judicial corruption, and finally a bitter and protracted battle over Court decisions on educational funding. Chief Justice Brock publicly embodied the judicial branch's new status and assertiveness. When information came to light regarding some of his administrative actions on the high court, deepening antipathy toward him exploded into an impeachment crisis. The struggle over Brock’s conduct raised significant questionsabout the meaning and proper practice of impeachment itself as a feature of democratic governance. When articles of impeachment were voted by the House of Representatives, the state Senate faced the difficult task of establishing trial protocols that would balance thepolitical and juridical responsibilities devolved on them, simultaneously, by the state constitution.Having struck that balance, the trial they conducted would finally acquit Brock of all charges. Nevertheless, David Brock’s impeachment was a highly consequential ordeal that provided a needed catalyst for reforms intended to produce a productive recalibration of legislative-judicial relations.
Judicial Impeachment
Author: Mary L. Volcansek
Publisher: University of Illinois Press
ISBN: 9780252019616
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 214
Book Description
Impeachment by the House and conviction by the Senate are the sole means of removing presidents and other federal officials from office. The congressional power to do so had been used sparingly until the early 1980s, when three federal judges were removed by the Senate in almost as many years. Through extensive use of original transcripts, Mary Volcansek analyzes the criminal and congressional proceedings that led to the Senate's conviction and removal of U.S. Judges Harry Claiborne (Nevada), Walter Nixon (Mississippi), and Alcee Hastings (Florida). Claiborne and Nixon both had already been convicted of felonies, yet they demanded impeachment and trial rather than resign their judicial appointments. They and Hastings portrayed themselves as victims of vendettas, claims that altered little when the Senate considered their cases. Volcansek explores various political and legal explanations for the rise in impeachments, among them the Judicial Conduct Act of 1980; the Public Integrity Office of the U.S. Department of Justice; partisanship and ideology; and judicial corruption. She also shows how the cases of Claiborne, Hastings, and Nixon are more than studies in judicial misconduct: the events leading to their Senate convictions, she is convinced, allow evaluation of how law enforcement, the Judicial Conduct Act, impeachment, and politics fit together. Finally, she considers the impeachments in the context of the competing ideals of judicial accountability and independence, suggesting that a type of special counsel be used to investigate alleged judicial misbehavior as a means of stemming misconduct while insulating the judiciary from executive or partisan interference.
Publisher: University of Illinois Press
ISBN: 9780252019616
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 214
Book Description
Impeachment by the House and conviction by the Senate are the sole means of removing presidents and other federal officials from office. The congressional power to do so had been used sparingly until the early 1980s, when three federal judges were removed by the Senate in almost as many years. Through extensive use of original transcripts, Mary Volcansek analyzes the criminal and congressional proceedings that led to the Senate's conviction and removal of U.S. Judges Harry Claiborne (Nevada), Walter Nixon (Mississippi), and Alcee Hastings (Florida). Claiborne and Nixon both had already been convicted of felonies, yet they demanded impeachment and trial rather than resign their judicial appointments. They and Hastings portrayed themselves as victims of vendettas, claims that altered little when the Senate considered their cases. Volcansek explores various political and legal explanations for the rise in impeachments, among them the Judicial Conduct Act of 1980; the Public Integrity Office of the U.S. Department of Justice; partisanship and ideology; and judicial corruption. She also shows how the cases of Claiborne, Hastings, and Nixon are more than studies in judicial misconduct: the events leading to their Senate convictions, she is convinced, allow evaluation of how law enforcement, the Judicial Conduct Act, impeachment, and politics fit together. Finally, she considers the impeachments in the context of the competing ideals of judicial accountability and independence, suggesting that a type of special counsel be used to investigate alleged judicial misbehavior as a means of stemming misconduct while insulating the judiciary from executive or partisan interference.
Proceedings in the Court of Impeachment in the Matter of the Impeachment of George G. Barnard, a Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
The Great Impeachment and Trial of Andrew Johnson, President of the United States
Author: Andrew Johnson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Impeachments
Languages : en
Pages : 312
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Impeachments
Languages : en
Pages : 312
Book Description
Report of the Trial of the Hon. Samuel Chase
Proceedings in the Court of Impeachment in the Matter of the Impeachment of George G. Barnard, a Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Author: George Gardner Barnard
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judges
Languages : en
Pages : 836
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judges
Languages : en
Pages : 836
Book Description
Grand Inquests
Author: William H. Rehnquist
Publisher: William Morrow
ISBN: 9780688051426
Category : Impeachments
Languages : en
Pages : 308
Book Description
The two acquittals by the Senate were important because they forestalled the use of impeachment solely for political purposes in this country. Chief Justice Rehnquist tells the stories. Annotation copyright by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR
Publisher: William Morrow
ISBN: 9780688051426
Category : Impeachments
Languages : en
Pages : 308
Book Description
The two acquittals by the Senate were important because they forestalled the use of impeachment solely for political purposes in this country. Chief Justice Rehnquist tells the stories. Annotation copyright by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR