Author: Dana J. EdwardsPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Teacher effectiveness
Languages : en
Pages : 113
Book Description
This study examined teachers' and administrators' perceptions of Danielson's Framework for Teaching supervisory process. Three suburban public school districts in southeastern Pennsylvania were the focus of this study. Teachers (48) and administrators (24) were questioned through online questionnaires with Likert-type scale statements, open-ended questions, and individual interviews. The research instruments enabled the researcher to focus on the following topics: (a) the benefits of Danielson's Framework for Teaching, (b) the impact of Danielson's Framework for Teaching, and (c) improvements that can be made to Danielson's Framework for Teaching. The findings of this study indicated that Danielson's Framework for Teaching is a supervisory process that encourages academic achievement and professional growth. Teachers and administrators reported being much more comfortable with this supervisory process when compared to those that were used previously. In addition, participants indicated the Framework provides for common language and objective components, which allow for professional discussion focused on student achievement and professional growth. An area of concern that was revealed in the study is the substantial time commitment required for the Framework to be implemented with fidelity in all schools with all professional staff. The Pennsylvania Department of Education piloted the new teacher evaluation system called the Teacher Effectiveness Project over three years starting with the 2010-2011 school year. Beginning with the 2013-2014 school year, the four domains indicated in Danielson's Framework for Teaching supervisory process account for 50% of each teacher's evaluation in the new system. With Danielson's Framework for Teaching being such a new process, teachers and administrators must understand the most recent research in this area to increase its effectiveness on student achievement and professional growth. However, further research is still needed in Pennsylvania to identify the Framework's strengths and weaknesses over time.