Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Reform. Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy, and Human ResourcesPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Psychology
Languages : en
Pages : 122
Book Description
Substance Abuse Treatment Parity
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Reform. Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy, and Human ResourcesPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Psychology
Languages : en
Pages : 122
Book Description
Mental Health Parity Act
Author: John DickenPublisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 9780756703219
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 70
Book Description
To address the discrepancies in coverage between mental & other illnesses, Congress passed the Mental Health Parity Act of 1996. It prohibits employers from imposing annual or lifetime dollar limits on mental health coverage that are more restrictive than those imposed on medical & surgical coverage. In preparation for the law's Sept. 30, 2001 sunset & possible reauthorization, this report discusses: the extent to which employers comply with the law & how they have revised their health plans; the law's effect on claims costs; & the steps Federal agencies have taken to ensure compliance with the law. Charts & tables.
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Parity
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Ways and Means. Subcommittee on HealthPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 96
Book Description
Mental Health Parity Legislation, Cost-Sharing and Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions
Author: Dhaval DavePublisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 39
Book Description
Treatment is highly cost-effective in reducing an individual's substance abuse (SA) and associated harms. However, data from Treatment Episodes (TEDS) indicate that per capita treatment admissions substantially lagged behind increases in heavy drug use from 1992-2007. Only ten percent of individuals with clinical SA disorders receive any treatment, and almost half who forgo treatment point to accessibility and cost constraints as barriers to care. This study investigates the impact of state mental health and SA parity legislation on treatment admission flows and cost-sharing. Fixed effects specifications indicate that mandating comprehensive parity for mental health and SA disorders raises the probability that a treatment admission is privately insured, lowering costs for the individual. Despite some crowd-out of charity care for private insurance, mandates reduce the uninsured probability by a net 2.4 percentage points. States mandating comprehensive parity also see an increase in total treatment admissions. Thus, increasing cost-sharing and reducing financial barriers may aid the at-risk population in obtaining adequate SA treatment. Supply constraints mute effect sizes, suggesting that demand-focused interventions need to be complemented with policies supporting treatment providers. These results have implications for the effectiveness of the 2008 Federal Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act in increasing SA treatment admissions and promoting cost-sharing.
Effects of the Vermont Mental Health and Substance Abuse Parity Law
Author: The Impact of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) on Behavioral Health Care Utilization and Spending
Author: Mitz D. AlejandriaPublisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 35
Book Description
The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) of 2008 is a federal act that was passed to widen the scope of the previous Mental Health Parity Act (MHPA) of 1996. The MHPAEA constructed uniform treatment regulations regarding mental health and substance use disorders. After federal parity laws were enacted, increases were evident in both behavioral health care service utilization and spending. This qualitative analysis found that health care service utilization increases were seen in insured adults and their dependents in the realms of bipolar disorder, major depression, substance use disorders, and other various mental health disorders. Spending increases were seen from insurers and insured adults and their dependents. The evidence suggests that in combination with state parity laws, the federal mandate of mental health insurance laws can aid individuals in seeking the proper mental health care they seek. Regarding spending, this study found that out-of-pocket expenses increased post-parity in relation to pre-parity data. Federal enactment of parity laws suggests more effective utilization, spending, and regulation of mental health and substance use treatment services. Future policy implications at the federal level include improvements in patient risk protection at minimal increases in costs, protection for employers that assume the risk for health care services and increases in behavioral health care service utilization alongside minimal increases in spending from all parties.
Ending Discrimination Against People with Mental and Substance Use Disorders
Author: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and MedicinePublisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309439124
Category : Social Science
Languages : en
Pages : 171
Book Description
Estimates indicate that as many as 1 in 4 Americans will experience a mental health problem or will misuse alcohol or drugs in their lifetimes. These disorders are among the most highly stigmatized health conditions in the United States, and they remain barriers to full participation in society in areas as basic as education, housing, and employment. Improving the lives of people with mental health and substance abuse disorders has been a priority in the United States for more than 50 years. The Community Mental Health Act of 1963 is considered a major turning point in America's efforts to improve behavioral healthcare. It ushered in an era of optimism and hope and laid the groundwork for the consumer movement and new models of recovery. The consumer movement gave voice to people with mental and substance use disorders and brought their perspectives and experience into national discussions about mental health. However over the same 50-year period, positive change in American public attitudes and beliefs about mental and substance use disorders has lagged behind these advances. Stigma is a complex social phenomenon based on a relationship between an attribute and a stereotype that assigns undesirable labels, qualities, and behaviors to a person with that attribute. Labeled individuals are then socially devalued, which leads to inequality and discrimination. This report contributes to national efforts to understand and change attitudes, beliefs and behaviors that can lead to stigma and discrimination. Changing stigma in a lasting way will require coordinated efforts, which are based on the best possible evidence, supported at the national level with multiyear funding, and planned and implemented by an effective coalition of representative stakeholders. Ending Discrimination Against People with Mental and Substance Use Disorders: The Evidence for Stigma Change explores stigma and discrimination faced by individuals with mental or substance use disorders and recommends effective strategies for reducing stigma and encouraging people to seek treatment and other supportive services. It offers a set of conclusions and recommendations about successful stigma change strategies and the research needed to inform and evaluate these efforts in the United States.
Approaches in Implementing the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act
Author: Health Benefits Coverage Under Federal Law--.
Author: Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Employer-sponsored health insurance
Languages : en
Pages : 108
Book Description
Substance Abuse Treatment Parity
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Reform. Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy, and Human ResourcesPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Psychology
Languages : en
Pages : 120
Book Description