Strategic Coordination of Good and Bad News Disclosures PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Strategic Coordination of Good and Bad News Disclosures PDF full book. Access full book title Strategic Coordination of Good and Bad News Disclosures by Benjamin Lansford. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Benjamin Lansford Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 0
Book Description
Firms enjoy a wide degree of discretion in their disclosure of events in the patent granting process, which investors generally view as "good news" announcements. This study examines the timing of patent disclosure in conjunction with earnings announcements in light of managers' incentives to avoid the stock price-related consequences of earnings disappointments. Among a sample of firms making voluntary patent disclosures, the results suggest that the likelihood of disclosing a patent before a "bad news" earnings announcement increases in the magnitude of the negative earnings surprise. Further, such strategic patent disclosure appears to successfully dampen the market response to the earnings disappointment. Overall, the empirical findings suggest that some firms strategically time the voluntary disclosure of patent-related information in order to manage their short-term stock prices before an adverse information event.
Author: Benjamin Lansford Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 0
Book Description
Firms enjoy a wide degree of discretion in their disclosure of events in the patent granting process, which investors generally view as "good news" announcements. This study examines the timing of patent disclosure in conjunction with earnings announcements in light of managers' incentives to avoid the stock price-related consequences of earnings disappointments. Among a sample of firms making voluntary patent disclosures, the results suggest that the likelihood of disclosing a patent before a "bad news" earnings announcement increases in the magnitude of the negative earnings surprise. Further, such strategic patent disclosure appears to successfully dampen the market response to the earnings disappointment. Overall, the empirical findings suggest that some firms strategically time the voluntary disclosure of patent-related information in order to manage their short-term stock prices before an adverse information event.
Author: Jenny Wu Tucker Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 36
Book Description
There are mixed views about whether firm managers voluntarily disclose good news in a more timely fashion than they do bad news. Our study investigates this issue by inferring managers' strategic disclosure behavior from firms' stock returns in the earnings announcement vs. non-announcement windows in the recent time period (1996-2005). We find that large firms' non-announcement excess returns are significantly lower than their announcement returns and vice versa for a typical small firm. Because excess return captures news arrived during the measurement window, our results suggest that for large firms bad news is relatively more timely than good news and for small firms good news is relatively more timely than bad news. If private information search is as likely to uncover good news as it is to uncover bad news, our evidence suggests that large firms preempt bad news, whereas small firms preempt good news. Furthermore, we find the relative timeliness of large firms' bad news only in the recent period, not in an early time period, suggesting that preemptive bad-news disclosure of large firms is a recent phenomenon.
Author: Yue Zhang Publisher: ISBN: Category : Corporate profits Languages : en Pages : 122
Book Description
This study shows that the likelihood of good news management forecasts relative to bad news management forecasts of quarterly earnings increases after the enactment of Regulation Fair Disclosure (Reg FD). This result suggests that Reg FD leads to a significantly greater change in private to public disclosure of good news than of bad news. I also find that compared to the pre-Reg FD period, in the post-Reg FD period, the horizon of good news forecasts is greater than the horizon of bad news forecasts. This result suggests that good news management earnings forecasts are disclosed to the market more quickly than bad news management earnings forecasts. Overall, the study contributes to the literature on the effectiveness of Reg FD and whether managers withhold bad news.
Author: Sebastien Gay Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 48
Book Description
I examine how firms strategically bundle news reports to offset the negative effects of a privacy breach disclosure. Using a complete dataset of privacy breaches from 2005 to 2014, I find that firms experience a small and significant 0.27% decrease in their stock price on average following the breaking news disclosure of the privacy breach. But controlling for media coverage, this small decline is offset by an increase in the effect of a larger than usual number of positive news reports released by the firm on that day, which could increase the returns by 0.47% for every additional positive news report compared to their usual media coverage. I further find that disclosure laws have a significant and negative effect on the returns, even when news releases are used to alleviate the decrease. Moreover, a portfolio constructed with breached firms controlling for state disclosure laws outperforms the market over the 2007-2014 period, especially in the case of breached firms in mandatory disclosure states.
Author: Benjamin Segal Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 51
Book Description
Using a comprehensive sample of non-earnings 8-K filings from 2005-2013, we examine whether firms engage in strategic reporting of mandatory and voluntary news. In particular, we examine whether firms report negative news when investor attention is low, and whether firms bundle positive and negative news. Our findings support the notion that managers believe in the existence of investor inattention and engage in strategic disclosure by reporting negative news after trading hours. These results particularly apply to public firms, where equity market pressures provide stronger incentives to mitigate market reaction to news by exploiting investor inattention. Further analysis of the market reaction to strategic disclosure uncovers no evidence of investor inattention, consistent with market efficiency. We also observe that public firms are more likely to engage in strategic disclosure through news bundling and that the likelihood of strategic disclosure through bundling increases with the likelihood of strategic disclosure through timing.
Author: Ling Cen Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 64
Book Description
In the presence of litigation facing suppliers, the supply-chain relationship is at risk. Suppliers with principal customers (dependent suppliers) have a higher concentration of sales to customers, and they are more at risk relative to suppliers without principal customers (non-dependent suppliers). As a result, we predict and find that litigation disclosure patterns differ for the two supplier types: dependent suppliers are more likely to delay bad news and accelerate good news related to litigation outcomes, compared to non-dependent suppliers. Such strategic disclosure patterns in our end-game setting are opposite to those documented in the existing supply-chain literature for the repeated-game setting (for example, Hui, Klasa, and Yeung 2012).
Author: Omri Ben-Shahar Publisher: Princeton University Press ISBN: 0691161704 Category : Law Languages : en Pages : 239
Book Description
How mandated disclosure took over the regulatory landscape—and why it failed Perhaps no kind of regulation is more common or less useful than mandated disclosure—requiring one party to a transaction to give the other information. It is the iTunes terms you assent to, the doctor's consent form you sign, the pile of papers you get with your mortgage. Reading the terms, the form, and the papers is supposed to equip you to choose your purchase, your treatment, and your loan well. More Than You Wanted to Know surveys the evidence and finds that mandated disclosure rarely works. But how could it? Who reads these disclosures? Who understands them? Who uses them to make better choices? Omri Ben-Shahar and Carl Schneider put the regulatory problem in human terms. Most people find disclosures complex, obscure, and dull. Most people make choices by stripping information away, not layering it on. Most people find they can safely ignore most disclosures and that they lack the literacy to analyze them anyway. And so many disclosures are mandated that nobody could heed them all. Nor can all this be changed by simpler forms in plainer English, since complex things cannot be made simple by better writing. Furthermore, disclosure is a lawmakers' panacea, so they keep issuing new mandates and expanding old ones, often instead of taking on the hard work of writing regulations with bite. Timely and provocative, More Than You Wanted to Know takes on the form of regulation we encounter daily and asks why we must encounter it at all.
Author: Ronda Hughes Publisher: Department of Health and Human Services ISBN: Category : Medical Languages : en Pages : 592
Book Description
"Nurses play a vital role in improving the safety and quality of patient car -- not only in the hospital or ambulatory treatment facility, but also of community-based care and the care performed by family members. Nurses need know what proven techniques and interventions they can use to enhance patient outcomes. To address this need, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), with additional funding from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, has prepared this comprehensive, 1,400-page, handbook for nurses on patient safety and quality -- Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. (AHRQ Publication No. 08-0043)." - online AHRQ blurb, http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/nurseshdbk/
Author: Benjamin Lansford
Author: Benjamin Lansford
Author: Douglas J. Skinner
Author: Jenny Wu Tucker
Author: Yue Zhang
Author: Sebastien Gay
Author: Benjamin Segal
Author: Ling Cen
Author: 
Author: Omri Ben-Shahar
Author: Ronda Hughes