Author: Colorado. Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Fines (Penalties)
Languages : en
Pages : 15
Book Description
Solid Waste Penalty Policy
Author: Colorado. Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Fines (Penalties)
Languages : en
Pages : 15
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Fines (Penalties)
Languages : en
Pages : 15
Book Description
Solid Waste Enforcement Response Policy
Author: Colorado. Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Hazardous wastes
Languages : en
Pages : 7
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Hazardous wastes
Languages : en
Pages : 7
Book Description
RCRA Civil Penalty Policy
Author: U. S. Environmental Agency
Publisher: CreateSpace
ISBN: 9781505957372
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 112
Book Description
To respond to the problem of improper management of hazardous waste, Congress amended the Solid Waste Disposal Act with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976. Although the Act has several objectives, Congress' overriding purpose in enacting RCRA was to establish the basic statutory framework for a national system that would ensure the proper management of hazardous waste. The penalty calculation system established through U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's RCRA Civil Penalty Policy ("Penalty Policy" or "Policy") is based upon Section 3008 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. ยง 6928. Under this section, the seriousness of the violation and any good faith efforts to comply with applicable requirements are to be considered in assessing a penalty. Consistent with this statutory direction, this Penalty Policy consists of: (1) determining a gravity-based penalty for a particular violation, from a penalty assessment matrix, (2) adding a "multi-day" component, as appropriate, to account for a violation's duration, (3) adjusting the sum of the gravity-based and multi-day components, up or down, for case specific circumstances, and (4) adding to this amount the appropriate economic benefit gained through non-compliance. In administrative civil penalty cases, EPA will perform two separate calculations under this Policy: (1) to determine an appropriate amount to seek in the administrative complaint and subsequent litigation, and (2) to explain and document the process by which the Agency arrived at the penalty figure it has agreed to accept in settlement. The methodology for these calculations will differ only in that no downward adjustments (other than those reflecting a violator's good faith efforts to comply with applicable requirements) will usually be included in the calculation of the proposed penalty for the administrative complaint. In those instances where the respondent or reliable information demonstrates prior to the issuance of the complaint that applying further downward adjustment factors (over and above those reflecting a violator's good faith efforts to comply) is appropriate, enforcement personnel may in their discretion (but are not required to) make such further downward adjustments in the amount of the penalty proposed in the complaint. In determining the amount of the penalty to be included in the complaint, enforcement personnel should consider all possible ramifications posed by the violation and resolve any doubts (e.g., as to the application of adjustment factors or the assumptions underlying the amount of the economic benefit enjoyed by the violator) against the violator in a manner consistent with the facts and findings so as to preserve EPA's ability to litigate for the strongest penalty possible. It should be noted that assumptions underlying any upward adjustments or refusal to apply downward adjustments in the penalty amount are subject to revision later as new information becomes available. In civil judicial cases, EPA will use the narrative penalty assessment criteria set forth in the Policy to explain the penalty amount agreed to in settlement.
Publisher: CreateSpace
ISBN: 9781505957372
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 112
Book Description
To respond to the problem of improper management of hazardous waste, Congress amended the Solid Waste Disposal Act with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976. Although the Act has several objectives, Congress' overriding purpose in enacting RCRA was to establish the basic statutory framework for a national system that would ensure the proper management of hazardous waste. The penalty calculation system established through U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's RCRA Civil Penalty Policy ("Penalty Policy" or "Policy") is based upon Section 3008 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. ยง 6928. Under this section, the seriousness of the violation and any good faith efforts to comply with applicable requirements are to be considered in assessing a penalty. Consistent with this statutory direction, this Penalty Policy consists of: (1) determining a gravity-based penalty for a particular violation, from a penalty assessment matrix, (2) adding a "multi-day" component, as appropriate, to account for a violation's duration, (3) adjusting the sum of the gravity-based and multi-day components, up or down, for case specific circumstances, and (4) adding to this amount the appropriate economic benefit gained through non-compliance. In administrative civil penalty cases, EPA will perform two separate calculations under this Policy: (1) to determine an appropriate amount to seek in the administrative complaint and subsequent litigation, and (2) to explain and document the process by which the Agency arrived at the penalty figure it has agreed to accept in settlement. The methodology for these calculations will differ only in that no downward adjustments (other than those reflecting a violator's good faith efforts to comply with applicable requirements) will usually be included in the calculation of the proposed penalty for the administrative complaint. In those instances where the respondent or reliable information demonstrates prior to the issuance of the complaint that applying further downward adjustment factors (over and above those reflecting a violator's good faith efforts to comply) is appropriate, enforcement personnel may in their discretion (but are not required to) make such further downward adjustments in the amount of the penalty proposed in the complaint. In determining the amount of the penalty to be included in the complaint, enforcement personnel should consider all possible ramifications posed by the violation and resolve any doubts (e.g., as to the application of adjustment factors or the assumptions underlying the amount of the economic benefit enjoyed by the violator) against the violator in a manner consistent with the facts and findings so as to preserve EPA's ability to litigate for the strongest penalty possible. It should be noted that assumptions underlying any upward adjustments or refusal to apply downward adjustments in the penalty amount are subject to revision later as new information becomes available. In civil judicial cases, EPA will use the narrative penalty assessment criteria set forth in the Policy to explain the penalty amount agreed to in settlement.
State Civil Penalty Authorities and Policies
Policy on the Establishment and Enforcement of Tonnage Limits at Solid Waste Facilities
Author: Massachusetts. Division of Solid Waste Management
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Refuse disposal facilities
Languages : en
Pages : 4
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Refuse disposal facilities
Languages : en
Pages : 4
Book Description
Revised RCRA Civil Penalty Policy 1990
Author: United States. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Enforcement. RCRA Division
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Hazardous waste sites
Languages : en
Pages : 3
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Hazardous waste sites
Languages : en
Pages : 3
Book Description
Inventory of Solid Waste Facilities Violating State Minimum Standards
Suggested Solid Waste Management Ordinance for Local Government
Author: National Association of Counties Research Foundation
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Factory and trade waste
Languages : en
Pages : 36
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Factory and trade waste
Languages : en
Pages : 36
Book Description
Illegal Dumping Prevention Guidebook
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Offenses against the environment
Languages : en
Pages : 44
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Offenses against the environment
Languages : en
Pages : 44
Book Description
Policy and Procedures for Maintaining the Inventory of Solid Waste Facilities which Violate State Minimum Standards
Author: California Integrated Waste Management Board
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Waste disposal sites
Languages : en
Pages : 8
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Waste disposal sites
Languages : en
Pages : 8
Book Description