Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Science and state
Languages : en
Pages : 19
Book Description
Setting Priorities in Science and Technology
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Science and state
Languages : en
Pages : 19
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Science and state
Languages : en
Pages : 19
Book Description
Setting Priorities in Science
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Subcommittee on Science
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 272
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 272
Book Description
Setting Priorities for the Science Base
Author: Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (Great Britain)
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781897941157
Category : Great Britain
Languages : en
Pages : 87
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781897941157
Category : Great Britain
Languages : en
Pages : 87
Book Description
Setting Priorities for Science
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Technology. Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Technology
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 244
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 244
Book Description
Setting Priorities in Science
Setting Priorities for Science
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Technology. Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Technology
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Federal aid to research
Languages : en
Pages : 240
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Federal aid to research
Languages : en
Pages : 240
Book Description
Setting Priorities for Space Research
Author: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Publisher: CreateSpace
ISBN: 9781502845955
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 92
Book Description
Finding an effective and reasonably objective method for setting priorities across scientific disciplines is something of a holy grail of science policy, and one whose urgency continues to grow. The Space Studies Board Task Group on Priorities in Space Research presented a thorough analysis of the pros and cons of priority setting and recommended that an effort to develop such a method proceed. The next phase involved this task group, and eventually the full Board, in an ambitious attempt to construct a formal, semiquantitative methodology to set priorities among major space science projects using both scientific and societal criteria. They also conducted a trial application of the methodology to a set of hypothetical space science initiatives. This is a report on the methodology and this exercise. Like a great many worthy scientific experiments, this exercise did not yield exactly what the framers had anticipated. In particular, the Board was not able to reach a consensus on the task group's methodology for setting priorities. This report contains an analysis of general issues in priority setting and presents a valuable record of the strengths and weaknesses of the task group's proposed methodology, one among many possible approaches. This report will inform continuing efforts in this area, including a recently undertaken, congressionally mandated Board study. The latter study is following a different approach toward different, but related, goals—agency organization and technology utilization are being analyzed together with the research priority-setting problem.
Publisher: CreateSpace
ISBN: 9781502845955
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 92
Book Description
Finding an effective and reasonably objective method for setting priorities across scientific disciplines is something of a holy grail of science policy, and one whose urgency continues to grow. The Space Studies Board Task Group on Priorities in Space Research presented a thorough analysis of the pros and cons of priority setting and recommended that an effort to develop such a method proceed. The next phase involved this task group, and eventually the full Board, in an ambitious attempt to construct a formal, semiquantitative methodology to set priorities among major space science projects using both scientific and societal criteria. They also conducted a trial application of the methodology to a set of hypothetical space science initiatives. This is a report on the methodology and this exercise. Like a great many worthy scientific experiments, this exercise did not yield exactly what the framers had anticipated. In particular, the Board was not able to reach a consensus on the task group's methodology for setting priorities. This report contains an analysis of general issues in priority setting and presents a valuable record of the strengths and weaknesses of the task group's proposed methodology, one among many possible approaches. This report will inform continuing efforts in this area, including a recently undertaken, congressionally mandated Board study. The latter study is following a different approach toward different, but related, goals—agency organization and technology utilization are being analyzed together with the research priority-setting problem.
Setting Priorities in Science
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Subcommittee on Science
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 284
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 284
Book Description
Establishing Priorities in Science Funding
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Budget. Task Force on Defense, Foreign Policy, and Space
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 292
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 292
Book Description
Setting Priorities for Large Research Facility Projects Supported by the National Science Foundation
Author: National Research Council
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309090849
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 236
Book Description
In 1995, the National Science Foundation (NSF) created a special account to fund large (several tens of millions of dollars) research facilities. Over the years, these facilities have come to represent an increasingly prominent part of the nation's R&D portfolio. Recently concern has intensified about the way NSF is selecting projects for this account. In 2003, six U.S. Senators including the chair and ranking member of the Senate Subcommittee on VA, HUD, and Independent Agencies Appropriations expressed these concerns in a letter to the NRC asking it to "review the current prioritization process and report to us on how it can be improved." This report presents a series of recommendations on how NSF can improve its priority setting process for large research facilities. While noting that NSF has improved this process, the report states that further strengthening is needed if NSF is to meet future demands for such projects.
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309090849
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 236
Book Description
In 1995, the National Science Foundation (NSF) created a special account to fund large (several tens of millions of dollars) research facilities. Over the years, these facilities have come to represent an increasingly prominent part of the nation's R&D portfolio. Recently concern has intensified about the way NSF is selecting projects for this account. In 2003, six U.S. Senators including the chair and ranking member of the Senate Subcommittee on VA, HUD, and Independent Agencies Appropriations expressed these concerns in a letter to the NRC asking it to "review the current prioritization process and report to us on how it can be improved." This report presents a series of recommendations on how NSF can improve its priority setting process for large research facilities. While noting that NSF has improved this process, the report states that further strengthening is needed if NSF is to meet future demands for such projects.