Author: National Science Foundation (U.S.). Office of Economic and Manpower StudiesPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 124
Book Description
Scientific Activities at Universities and Colleges, 1964
Author: National Science Foundation (U.S.). Office of Economic and Manpower StudiesPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 124
Book Description
Scientific Activities at Universities and Colleges
Author: National Science Foundation (U.S.)Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Research
Languages : en
Pages : 116
Book Description
Resources for Scientific Activities at Universities and Colleges
Author: National Science Foundation (U.S.)Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Research
Languages : en
Pages : 116
Book Description
Resources for Scientific Activities at Universities and Colleges, 1969
Author: National Science Foundation (U.S.)Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 172
Book Description
Expenditures for Scientific Activities at Universities and Colleges Fiscal Year ...
Author: Manpower Resources for Scientific Activities at Universities and Colleges
Author: Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Engineers
Languages : en
Pages : 76
Book Description
Report provides information on trends in overall employment levels: in teaching versus research; at public versus private universities and colleges; and for women scientists and engineers.
Manpower Resources for Scientific Activities of Universities and Colleges
Author: Resources Supporting Scientific Activities at Predominantly Black Colleges and Universities
Author: Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : African American universities and colleges
Languages : en
Pages : 622
Book Description
High-impact Educational Practices
Author: George D. KuhPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 50
Book Description
This publication¿the latest report from AAC&U¿s Liberal Education and America¿s Promise (LEAP) initiative¿defines a set of educational practices that research has demonstrated have a significant impact on student success. Author George Kuh presents data from the National Survey of Student Engagement about these practices and explains why they benefit all students, but also seem to benefit underserved students even more than their more advantaged peers. The report also presents data that show definitively that underserved students are the least likely students, on average, to have access to these practices.
Author: