Author: U.S. Army Defense Ammunition Center and School
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Military base closures
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
This report contains information on the Savanna Army Depot Activity Closure that is due to the downsizing of U.S. Military installations.
Savanna Army Depot Activity, Base Realignment and Closure 1995 Implementation Plan
Author: U.S. Army Defense Ammunition Center and School
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Military base closures
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
This report contains information on the Savanna Army Depot Activity Closure that is due to the downsizing of U.S. Military installations.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Military base closures
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
This report contains information on the Savanna Army Depot Activity Closure that is due to the downsizing of U.S. Military installations.
Savanna Army Depot Activity (SVADA), Disposal and Reuse for BRAC-95, Jo Daviess County, Carroll County
Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission
Author: United States. Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Electronic government information
Languages : en
Pages : 314
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Electronic government information
Languages : en
Pages : 314
Book Description
Base Closure and Realignment Report
Author: United States. Department of Defense
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 386
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 386
Book Description
The Environmental Update
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental protection
Languages : en
Pages : 314
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental protection
Languages : en
Pages : 314
Book Description
Fort Wingate Depot and Navajo Depot Activity Closures, Umatilla Depot Activity Realignment to Hawthorne Army Ammunition Plant (AZ,NM,NV,OR)
Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission
Author: DIANE Publishing Company
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 9780788124617
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 310
Book Description
Covers all military bases within each branch of the armed services. Examines the Commission's findings, discusses current activities at specific bases, and makes recommendations. Considers community concerns about base closures and realignments. Analyzes the history of base closures and the procedures for decision-making. Note: this is the last report by the Commission.
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 9780788124617
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 310
Book Description
Covers all military bases within each branch of the armed services. Examines the Commission's findings, discusses current activities at specific bases, and makes recommendations. Considers community concerns about base closures and realignments. Analyzes the history of base closures and the procedures for decision-making. Note: this is the last report by the Commission.
Scheduling Army Base Realignment and Closure
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 51
Book Description
During fourth rounds of base realignment and closure (BRAC), the United States Army reduced its military infrastructure to meet its future national security and military requirements. After each round's closures and realignments were approved, all necessary actions (excluding some environmental cleanup) had to be scheduled over six years. The United States Army used an integer linear program, BRACS (Base Realignment and Closure Action Schedule), to help guide the implementation of the 1995 round's actions. BRACAS schedules closure and realignment actions, to maximize the net present value (NPV) of total cost savings while adhering to annual budgets and other constraints. This thesis updates BRACAS. Its main contribution is a more realistic inclusion of environmental cleanup costs. Using data based on the Army's 1995 round and letting BRACAS pick its yearly (1996-2001) budget, the refined BRACAS finds a 20-year NPV of $6,346 million. We examine how closures and the 20-year NPV are changed for several scenarios where we restrict yearly budgets and alter the inclusion of environmental cleanup costs.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 51
Book Description
During fourth rounds of base realignment and closure (BRAC), the United States Army reduced its military infrastructure to meet its future national security and military requirements. After each round's closures and realignments were approved, all necessary actions (excluding some environmental cleanup) had to be scheduled over six years. The United States Army used an integer linear program, BRACS (Base Realignment and Closure Action Schedule), to help guide the implementation of the 1995 round's actions. BRACAS schedules closure and realignment actions, to maximize the net present value (NPV) of total cost savings while adhering to annual budgets and other constraints. This thesis updates BRACAS. Its main contribution is a more realistic inclusion of environmental cleanup costs. Using data based on the Army's 1995 round and letting BRACAS pick its yearly (1996-2001) budget, the refined BRACAS finds a 20-year NPV of $6,346 million. We examine how closures and the 20-year NPV are changed for several scenarios where we restrict yearly budgets and alter the inclusion of environmental cleanup costs.
Optimizing the Army's Base Realignment and Closure Implementation While Transforming and at War
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 60
Book Description
The United States Army is transforming and at war. This transformation is enabled by the 2005 round of Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC). If approved, this BRAC round will require the Army to spend about $13 billion over six years, moving 2,500 distinct units and undertaking military construction projects at about 180 locations. An anticipated savings of $24 billion over 20 years motivates this expense. During implementation of the last BRAC round in 1995, the Army used an integer linear program, the BRAC Action Scheduler (BRACAS), to prescribe BRAC implementation schedules. We modify BRACAS by adding unit-level resolution, including schedules and personnel strength to account for wartime deployments and transformation initiatives. The improved BRACAS produces realistic execution plans, and generates a schedule of feasibly timed unit moves. We conduct an extensive analysis using data provided by the Army. Our analysis shows the can synchronize BRAC implementation, transformation initiatives and wartime requirements. We find that including the deployment and transformation schedule limitations of major units does not significantly impact BRAC saving. We also find unlimited annual implementation budgets make additional savings approaching $900 million possible. Returning forces from germany early in implementation may save more - up to $4 billion minus additional facilities costs.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 60
Book Description
The United States Army is transforming and at war. This transformation is enabled by the 2005 round of Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC). If approved, this BRAC round will require the Army to spend about $13 billion over six years, moving 2,500 distinct units and undertaking military construction projects at about 180 locations. An anticipated savings of $24 billion over 20 years motivates this expense. During implementation of the last BRAC round in 1995, the Army used an integer linear program, the BRAC Action Scheduler (BRACAS), to prescribe BRAC implementation schedules. We modify BRACAS by adding unit-level resolution, including schedules and personnel strength to account for wartime deployments and transformation initiatives. The improved BRACAS produces realistic execution plans, and generates a schedule of feasibly timed unit moves. We conduct an extensive analysis using data provided by the Army. Our analysis shows the can synchronize BRAC implementation, transformation initiatives and wartime requirements. We find that including the deployment and transformation schedule limitations of major units does not significantly impact BRAC saving. We also find unlimited annual implementation budgets make additional savings approaching $900 million possible. Returning forces from germany early in implementation may save more - up to $4 billion minus additional facilities costs.