Review of Reserve Component Portrayal in Army War Games and Exercises. Volume 05-03 PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Review of Reserve Component Portrayal in Army War Games and Exercises. Volume 05-03 PDF full book. Access full book title Review of Reserve Component Portrayal in Army War Games and Exercises. Volume 05-03 by . Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 0
Book Description
The Army War College's Center for Strategic Leadership hosted 54 participants at a workshop conducted May 21-22 2003 at the Collins Center Carlisle Barracks Pennsylvania and examined the portrayal of reserve component forces in the recently concluded Strategic Crisis Exercise Joint Land Aerospace and Sea Simulation and Unified Quest 2003. Conference attendees included members of the Active Army Army Reserve and the Army and Air National Guard as well as civilian representatives from a variety of Department of Defense (DOD) organizations. Participants included National Guard (NG) and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) general officers representatives of the Joint Staff U.S. Northern Command (NORTHCOM) U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) U.S. Army Forces Command (FORSCOM) National Defense University (NDU) National Guard Bureau (NGB) and the Office of the Chief Army Reserve (OCAR). NG and USAR subject matter experts provided component updates and participant workshop groups examined RC issues in each of the three subject exercises. Breakout groups shared their findings with all participants in a concluding plenary session.
Author: Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 0
Book Description
The Army War College's Center for Strategic Leadership hosted 54 participants at a workshop conducted May 21-22 2003 at the Collins Center Carlisle Barracks Pennsylvania and examined the portrayal of reserve component forces in the recently concluded Strategic Crisis Exercise Joint Land Aerospace and Sea Simulation and Unified Quest 2003. Conference attendees included members of the Active Army Army Reserve and the Army and Air National Guard as well as civilian representatives from a variety of Department of Defense (DOD) organizations. Participants included National Guard (NG) and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) general officers representatives of the Joint Staff U.S. Northern Command (NORTHCOM) U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) U.S. Army Forces Command (FORSCOM) National Defense University (NDU) National Guard Bureau (NGB) and the Office of the Chief Army Reserve (OCAR). NG and USAR subject matter experts provided component updates and participant workshop groups examined RC issues in each of the three subject exercises. Breakout groups shared their findings with all participants in a concluding plenary session.
Author: Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 5
Book Description
This paper documents issues identified with the current missions and structures of the Army Reserve Components and of Northern Command's (NORTHCOM) homeland security missions through the prism of two senior service college war games: the U.S. Army War College's Strategic Crisis Exercise (SCE), and the Joint Land, Aerospace and Sea Simulation (JLASS) Exercise. In September 2002, as part of the preparation to more accurately portray the Army Reserve Component and associated NORTHCOM homeland security issues within these exercises, the U.S. Army War College conducted a workshop entitled "Portraying the Army Reserve Components in Army War Games and Exercises." This workshop brought together high-level and senior service college war gamers and members of the Army Guard and Army Reserve leadership to examine how the Reserve Component is portrayed in Army war games and exercises and to ensure that exercises correctly present Reserve Component roles and missions. Although the result of this workshop led to many improvements, the accuate portrayal of Reserve Component forces remains a continuing effort so that the portrayal stays current with their evolving readiness posture. This paper presents information on the workshop in the following sections: Homeland Security Play in Wargaming, Priorities: Homeland Security versus International Defense, A Role for NORTHCOM?, Initial Game Findings, and Recommendations.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on National Security. Military Personnel Subcommittee Publisher: ISBN: Category : Military planning Languages : en Pages : 196
Author: U. S. Military Publisher: ISBN: 9781520753843 Category : Languages : en Pages : 88
Book Description
The Army Reserve Component (RC) has a major role in America's Global War on Terror (GWOT). Over the past decade and a half, the Army National Guard (ARNG) and the United States Army Reserve (USAR) have mobilized hundreds of thousands of Soldiers in support of contingency operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as to numerous other missions worldwide and throughout the Continental United States (CONUS). They have proven their capabilities and exceeded operational expectations, successfully transitioning from the strategic reserve force of the Cold War era to a well-trained and experienced operational reserve force of the GWOT era. The problem facing the Department of Defense (DOD), is determining the future utilization of RC forces, specifically their operational role, their implementation, and the development of a suitable mobilization authority that will support a broad spectrum of future operational requirements. This monograph presents two primary arguments. First, the Army RC should continue its role as an operational reserve in support of future operational requirements. Second, continuing the use of the Army RC as an operational reserve requires the implementation of a new mobilization authority, one that will be more lasting, functional, and suitable for the current operating environment. This monograph presents two key proposals including the sustainment of the RC as an operational reserve, and a comprehensive plan for the implementation of a new mobilization authority. The action plan for these proposals includes a recommended framework and guidelines for a new mobilization authority that will achieve the goals of maintaining the use of RC forces as an operational reserve while modernizing the mobilization process to meet the demands of the current operating environment. A new and improved mobilization authority will allow Army RC forces to remain ready, reliable and relevant, capable of supporting future operational requirements of the 21st century. This monograph presents two primary arguments. First, the Army RC should continue its role as an operational reserve in support of future operational requirements. Second, continuing the use of the Army RC as an operational reserve requires the implementation of a new mobilization authority, one that will be more lasting, functional, and suitable for the current operating environment. There are five principal factors supporting the continued use of the Army RC as an operational reserve. First, over three quarters of a million Army RC Soldiers representing a large scale of ARNG and USAR units have mobilized since September 11, 2001 (9/11) in support of OEF, OIF, OND, and ONE, demonstrating the proven capabilities and very significant operational role of the Army RC in America's GWOT. 2 Second, as the Regular Army (RA) decreases its end strength, projected to fall to as low as 440,000 to 450,000 Soldiers by 2019, the RC can expect ongoing mobilizations and a substantial operational role. Third, current force structure allocations include a large volume of the Army's critical support units in the RC, including sustainment units and those historically categorized as combat support (i.e., chemical, engineer, military police, and signal units), as well as civil affairs and medical units. Maintaining such a large volume of the Army's support force structure in the RC increases the likelihood of their operational use for future operational requirements.
Author: Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 59
Book Description
The United States has responded to recent changes in the international political scene by beginning to reduce military forces. As forces are reduced, questions arise about their structure, particularly the balance between reserve and active forces. Active Component (AC) forces can respond on short notice but are expensive; reserve forces are more economical but tend to be less ready and would take more time to deploy. Vigorous debate has ensued about the share of the future Army force structure that should be accorded to each type of force. That debate frequently centers on the responsiveness of the reserve forces and on the time required to train reserve combat elements before deployment. This report estimates how long it takes Reserve Component (RC) combat forces to prepare for deployment to a wartime theater. It draws on four main sources of information: (1) Information on the train-up process of the three National Guard round-out brigades that were activated for service in Operation Desert Shield/Storm; (2) Analyses and projections of RC training times made by the Department of the Army Inspector General; (3) Training plans followed by AC units during peacetime to sustain readiness; and (4) An extensive series of interviews with both AC and RC personnel and observations of the 1992 summer Annual Training cycle for National Guard brigades. The analysis first defines 12 post-mobilization activities that RC combat units must complete following mobilization. It then estimates the time needed for the 12 activities under three scenarios (optimistic, intermediate, and pessimistic) that vary in assumptions about future RC peacetime training proficiency. The report finds that the optimistic case will require 79 days, the intermediate case 104 days, and the pessimistic case 128 days. These estimates assume that leadership can complete its training in parallel with troop training and that adequate training support from the AC will be available. (11 tables, 17 refs.).
Author: 
Author: 
Author: Jeffrey C. Reynolds
Author: Dick Dillon
Author: 
Author: 
Author: Mark E. Eisley
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on National Security. Military Personnel Subcommittee
Author: U. S. Military
Author: James L. Snyder
Author: