Restructuring the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction's Institutional Management Audit Process PDF Download

Author: Norm Welsh
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Management audit
Languages : en
Pages : 156

View

Book Description

Author: Ohio. Office of Inspector General
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Letting of contracts
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description
During the course of another investigation, the Office of the Ohio Inspector General discovered evidence that indicated the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC), Marion Correctional Institution (MCI), circumvented proper competitive bid processes. Specifically, MCI had amended a terminated contract with WinWin, Inc. (WinWin), and failed to inform and provide the ODRC contract administration with relevant information related to the contract's termination and subsequent contract addendums.

Author: Ohio. Office of Inspector General
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Correctional institutions
Languages : en
Pages : 4

View

Book Description
On February 7, 2018, the Office of the Ohio Inspector General received a complaint from the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) alleging suspected illegal activity by ODRC employee Jennifer Bouch. The compalint stated that a fiscal audit conducted by ODRC audit staff was unable to account for $690 held in an institutional account at the Northeast Reintegration Center (NERC).

Author: Ohio. Office of Inspector General
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Prisons
Languages : en
Pages : 11

View

Book Description
In February 2016, the Office of the Ohio Inspector General became aware of a report issued by the Michigan Office of Auditor General summarizing its review of the Michigan Department of Corrections Food Services and its contract with Aramark Correctional Services Inc. (Aramark). The report noted that the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) used the MealTrac computer system to track inmate meal activity. Because Aramark believed these counts were inaccurate, Aramark conducted its own meal counts and billed MDOC using its (Aramark's) count. The Michigan Auditor General reported that Aramark and MDOC were unable to agree on the accuracy of the MDOC meal counts and that no processes existed to validate the differences between Aramark's billed inmate meal counts and the MDOC meal counts. Thus, the Michigan Auditor General reported that MDOC paid Aramark $3.4 million for billed meal counts that exceeded the MDOC counts; and in some instances, the counts exceeded the facility census counts. The Office of the Ohio Inspector General compared the billing methods reflected in the contracts awarded to Aramark by the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) and by MDOC. Investigators determined that ODRC agreed to pay Aramark for meals served based on a midnight inmate census count, whereas MDOC paid Aramark for actual inmate meals served. Further research also revealed additional news articles highlighting issues with Aramark's over billing of meals served at various other correctional institutions throughout the United States. On May 18, 2016, the Office of the Ohio Inspector General initiated an investigation to review the contract provisions detailing payments to be made by the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction to Aramark Correctional Services, LLC for food services provided in accordance with the contract.

Author: Ohio. Office of Inspector General
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description
On January 29, 2014, the Office of the Ohio Inspector General received a complaint from former Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) Correction Officer Richard Stiehl alleging Lebanon Correctional Institution Warden Ernie Moore directed Correction Training Officer Bradley Hillard to falsify spring 2013 firearms in-service training records at the institution. Stiehl stated this occurred for every staff member at the institution who was required to attend the training. Stiehl wrote: A large number of staff were rushed through the range exercises in as little as 20-minutes for both lesson plans. In all cases, the approved lesson plans were not adequately provided to staff members or not conducted at all. It was Stiehl's belief that all staff members were to receive four or more hours of classroom time and practical application (firearms recertification) during these training sessions. Stiehl claimed, "All of the hundreds of training records reflect 4-hours of training that was not actually performed." Stiehl said when other training officers questioned Hillard about the shortened training sessions, Hillard responded that the reduced time spent at the training sessions had been approved by management. On February 4, 2014, the Office of the Ohio Inspector General opened an investigation into the complaint filed by Stiehl.

Author: Ohio. Office of Inspector General
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description
"In March 2012, the Office of the Inspector General received a complaint from the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) alleging Gayle Blankenship, a state purchasing procurement manager at the Ohio Department of Administrative Services (ODAS), improperly used her position for personal rather than state business reasons. Blakenship allegedly used her position to gain access to Pickaway Correctional Institution (PCI) by: attempting to visit certain correctional facility inmates during her regular work hours for the state; circumventing PCI policies and procedures in order to attempt to send an unapproved gift to an inmate; and sending personal email and communications to PCI employees and inmates during work hours. ... During the course of the investigation, the Office of the Inspector General discovered PCI Corrections Officer Susan Jones abused her position by consenting to the delivery of a gift for an inmate and by aiding in the delivery of the gift sent in violation of PCI policies and procedures."--Page 1.

Author: Ohio. Office of Inspector General
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Computers
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description
On January 28, 2016, the Office of the Ohio Inspector General initiated an investigation after receiving information from the Ohio Department of Administrative Services (ODAS), Office of Information Technology (OIT) about possible wrongdoing at the Richland Correctional Institution (RiCI). On January 4, 2016, the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) had received a Websense alert notifying officials that RiCI employee Chad Hider's user identification had been used to attempt to log into a proxy avoidance web site (Proxy avoidance websites allow users to bypass the browsing restrictions that are placed on a network).

Author: Ohio. Office of Inspector General
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Criminal investigation
Languages : en
Pages : 22

View

Book Description
On August 9, 2016, the Office of the Ohio Inspector General was notified that Marion Correctional Institution (MCI) inmate David Dean, during an interview with an Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) investigator, disclosed the location of prison contraband, including a hidden computer hard drive, razor blades, drill bits, and miscellaneous tools. These items were concealed inside an HP8000 printer in the Ohio Penal Industries (OPI) area of MCI. Dean claimed MCI-OPI staff instructed him to keep the contraband items in his work area " ... to keep them safe." Dean also claimed the hard drive contained thousands of dollars' worth of software programs illegally obtained.

Author: Ohio. Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Corrections
Languages : en
Pages : 11

View

Book Description

Author: Ohio. Office of Inspector General
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 10

View

Book Description
"The Office of the Inspector General received an email complaint alleging improper hiring practices at Madison Correctional Institution (MaCI). The complainant claimed that Business Administrator Darcy Turner-Olinger hired Amber Haskins, the daughter of the warden's assistant Melody Haskins, through a temporary employment agency. The complainant also alleged that Melody Haskins and her daughter, Amber, work for Turner-Olinger's food cart side business. Additionally, the complainant alleged that Turner-Olinger hired another individual, Julie McGraw, through a temporary employment agency to fill a position of a regular employee who was temporarily absent from work and on medical leave. The complainant alleged that McGraw had a disqualifying criminal charge listed on her background check, but Melody Haskins ' ... made that go away too.'"--Page 1.